The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #721  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:05 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,979
It all sounds like a huge mess to me fraught with multiple issues. Here is my take--unless HMQEII comes out and creates the Letters Patent herself, there is no way Charles is going to do it once he becomes King---and I quite agree that he shouldn't be the one to demote Camilla's rank. However, I don't think the Queen will do this because if that were the case, it would have happened when the marriage announcement occured. Changing Camilla's title sets a dangerous precedence for future monarchs wives and the simplest thing to do is to create her Queen when Charles becomes King and plop the Queen Mother's Coronation crown (Koh-i-noor and all) and all atop her head.
__________________

__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
  #722  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:05 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
If she survived The King, she would not be a dowager anything as she would already be a Princess in her own right
I found this sentence most informative. Thank you.
__________________

__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #723  
Old 04-18-2008, 10:26 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator in Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
We can probably be certain that the word 'Dowager' won't be used in any circumstances by a royal widow. I can't think of the last time a Queen was called 'Dowager Queen xxx', and certainly not since the Hanoverians ascended the throne, nor can I recall a Dowager Royal Duchess. It's more a descriptive or technical term rather than a formal title for British royalty and seems to be confined to the aristocracy where "Dowager Duchess" still sounds something special.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
  #724  
Old 04-18-2008, 10:36 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duchess Ravenna View Post
IIRC, that was the big problem with Lord Darnley and Mary Queen of Scots. He wanted the Scottish Crown Matrimonial, and the title of King, and she didn't want to give it to him. And we all see how well that worked out...
I can't check it right now but that's what Wiki says:
Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley was born in 1545, at Temple Newsam, Leeds, West Yorkshire, England, the son of the 4th Earl of Lennox, and his wife, Margaret Douglas. He was related to his future wife in at least three ways: they shared a grandmother in Margaret Tudor, putting both Mary and Darnley high in the line of succession for the English throne; Darnley was a descendant of a daughter of James II of Scotland and thus also in line for the throne of Scotland; and Darnley's family surname was due to a much more ancient connection to his male-line ancestor, Alexander Stewart, 4th High Steward of Scotland.

On their marriage, which took place 29 July 1565 in the chapel of Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh, Darnley was given the title of King of Scots, but he was a king consort only, with no royal powers."

The last info was new to me, too but I understand why Mary tried to keep him from the power - because his father was well-known for trying to get the throne of Scotland for himself while his mother had been the favorite of Mary Tudor for the succession in England and was thus regarded with hate by Elizabeth I. Both parents had so many connections, supporters etc. and Darnley had a weak character - to give him Royal power would have meant to endanger her own position.


While Prince Albert was to "German" in his connections and thinking and thus much too autocratic for the Britsih parliament of his time to want him as King Consort. While today it doesn't mean naything more than just another title confered on a person without real power behind it.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
  #725  
Old 04-18-2008, 12:26 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
The widowed Queen Consort thereby becomes Queen Dowager, though it is interesting that it is not a title used, rather one which is unspokenly observed. And that serves no greater purpose than to distinguish between those who were Consort, and they who are now the incumbent. So being addressed as HM Queen XXXX is in itself an adaption of the discussed title which seems, in a sense, agreeably unassuming.

Quote:
confined to the aristocracy where "Dowager Duchess" still sounds something special.
So true and likely portrayed as an 'executive authority'.
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #726  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:00 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 4,069
I don't think Dowager anything sounds special. I think it sounds fat. Like the big, fat, Dowager Duchess. I hope Camilla doesn't use that term at all!
  #727  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:07 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
It sounds fat?.lol.

It's extremely unlikely that Camilla would use the distinction in any title if she outlives her husband, though if crowned Queen, a Dowager she will be.
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #728  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:09 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Might be interesting to see what they'd call an ex-Queen who had the same name as the current Queen but wasn't the King's (or Queen's) mother. They might have to resort to Dowager.
  #729  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:17 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,541
If the Queen lives as long as her mother and dosn't abdicate the discussion about Camilla and Charles' titles would be irrelevent anyway and that is very possible.
  #730  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:18 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
That wud be an interesting circumstance. Though could it not be easily clarified by the monarchs mother using the title Queen Mother, whilst the other could just be known as Queen XXXX?

Though if sharing the same name, that could lead to some confusion so perhaps the other could be known as Queen Dowager.

Intruiging stuff!
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #731  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:30 PM
jcbcode99's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,979
Queen Dowager--what an interesting ring it has--it sounds odd, I supose I think it should be Dowager Queen. But, I doubt that will happen anyway--that's a discussion for after the next title gets figured out. I personally think that Camilla should be Queen Camilla, but Madame Royale has given a very eloquent reason for wanting Camilla to be HRH The Princess Consort (it's several pages back but I suggest new posters read it--it is enlightning!).
So, let's say she becomes Queen Camilla, then Charles passes away. William marries and his wife becomes Queen Whatever; wouldn't Camilla still be known as Queen Camilla? Incidentally, where does the Dowager Queen fall in the order of precedence? For QEQM was it QEII, QEQM, and so forth?
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
  #732  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
If crowned Queen, and Charles dies before his wife then Camilla would be HM Queen Camilla. The term Dowager represents the position of the former reigning consort though not necessarily her title.

Camilla would then fall beneath the Queen Consort in the Order of Precedence, as has been the case for all surviving consorts.
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #733  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:18 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Royale View Post
That wud be an interesting circumstance. Though could it not be easily clarified by the monarchs mother using the title Queen Mother, whilst the other could just be known as Queen XXXX?

Though if sharing the same name, that could lead to confusion so perhaps the other could be known as Queen Dowager.

Intruiging stuff!
If the ex-queen isn't the mother of the current monarch, she can't be known as the Queen Mother, though. If William IV's widow had been called Victoria rather than Adelaide, then when Queen Victoria came to the throne, we'd have had two Queen Victorias and the older one wouldn't have been the Queen Mother. I don't really see how they could have avoided a Dowager handle in that case.
  #734  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:29 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
Oh I did indeed read your post wrong.

For some reason, I thought you meant that there were three Queen's, one was the mother and one was not. I made no mention of the regnant. My mistake.

I think the Dowager would be HM Queen XXXX. Rembering, the Queen is HM The Queen so I'd have thought it wouldn't be to hard to distinguish who's who.

But perhaps the use of Dowager would be needed in such circumstances.

(Did I really type 'wud'? Oh dear...lol.)
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #735  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:42 PM
wbenson's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,546
An outsider would have been confused to hear palace officials speak of the two Queens before the Queen Mother died in 2002. The Queen Mother was always "Queen Elizabeth" and the Queen was always "The Queen." I don't think the Queen Mother's name was all that well-known among those who couldn't remember her from before 1952.
  #736  
Old 04-19-2008, 04:15 AM
lynnecam1uk's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: edinburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 8
I was a big supporter of Diana, Princess of Wales and still am, and i do think Diana was treated very badly, i don't d oubt she had faults everyone does, but she was treated badly, and i was very saddened when she died as she was a lovely person and for a long time i felt that Camilla should not even be allowed to join the Royal Family, but as much as i still like and admire Diana and always will l(Rip Diana) my opinion of Camilla has changed, i like her very much and if she makes Prince Charles happy well i think she should now be allowed to be Queen when Charles becomes King. I now think Camilla and Charles should have been married all those years ago. I don't think i would necesarily curtsey to her but I would acknowledge Camilla as Queen.
  #737  
Old 04-19-2008, 04:44 AM
Roslyn's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 4,100
Welcome, Lynne

I'm always pleased to read that someone who was a Diana supporter and was against Camilla has changed their mind and come to like her to the extent that you think she should be Queen. I'd be interested to know what changed your mind. Was it just that she makes Charles happy or was it something about Camilla herself that led you to reconsider your views?
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
  #738  
Old 04-19-2008, 05:50 AM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Royale View Post
If crowned Queen, and Charles dies before his wife then Camilla would be HM Queen Camilla. The term Dowager represents the position of the former reigning consort though not necessarily her title.

Camilla would then fall beneath the Queen Consort in the Order of Precedence, as has been the case for all surviving consorts.
Is it this way in Britain? In Russia it was different, if you look at the last Court Calendar before the revolution, of 1917. There first is the Emperor, but second is the emperor's mother, the Dowager Empress and third is the wife of the emperor.

You can find a link to it here:
http://www.riuo.org/SUCCESSION_ENGLISH.pdf
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
  #739  
Old 04-19-2008, 05:59 AM
lynnecam1uk's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: edinburgh, United Kingdom
Posts: 8
hi Roslyn

well i think she seems a really nice person and from good reports i have read about her and watching her in my monarchy dvd and how she gets on with people and i have heard she is a caring person and from what i can see of her that is true and yes if she makes charles happy that is excellent. i did watch them get married on the tv and i guess iti s a bit of both Camilla herself and making Charles happy that has made me change my mind. and everyone deserves a second chance to be happy and Camilla deserves our support too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
Welcome, Lynne

I'm always pleased to read that someone who was a Diana supporter and was against Camilla has changed their mind and come to like her to the extent that you think she should be Queen. I'd be interested to know what changed your mind. Was it just that she makes Charles happy or was it something about Camilla herself that led you to reconsider your views?
  #740  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:28 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo of Palatine View Post
Is it this way in Britain? In Russia it was different, if you look at the last Court Calendar before the revolution, of 1917. There first is the Emperor, but second is the emperor's mother, the Dowager Empress and third is the wife of the emperor.

You can find a link to it here:
http://www.riuo.org/SUCCESSION_ENGLISH.pdf
Yes it is that way in Britain.

The Order of Precedence for female members of the British royal family is...

The Queen (whether they be regnant or consort), followed by the Queen Dowager (most recent if more than one).
__________________

__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, camilla parker bowles, duchess of cornwall, princess consort, queen consort, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Victoria's Future Title? rop81 Crown Princess Victoria, Prince Daniel and Family 80 09-12-2021 08:00 PM
Will and should Camilla use the title of Queen when Charles becomes King? muriel The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 17 11-10-2011 10:20 AM
Crown Prince Hamzah relieved of his title: November 28, 2004 Amoula Current Events Archive 338 04-22-2005 09:28 AM




Popular Tags
america archie mountbatten-windsor asia birth britain britannia british british royal family buckingham palace camilla's family camilla parker bowles carolin china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing clarence house colorblindness crown jewels customs dresses duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family life fashion and style gemstones genetics gradenigo gustaf vi adolf harry and meghan hello! henry viii history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs jack brooksbank japan japan history kensington palace king edward vii lili mountbatten-windsor list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists monarchy names nara period plantinum jubilee pless politics prince harry queen consort queen elizabeth ii queen louise queen victoria royal ancestry solomon j solomon spanish royal family st edward sussex suthida swedish queen taiwan tradition united states of america wales welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×