Fireweaver
Courtier
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
- Messages
- 717
Camilla could become part of the family. There isn't really a law that says that they can't. It's just not really done.
WHY?Originally posted by Fireweaver@May 2nd, 2004 - 11:05 am
Camilla could become part of the family. There isn't really a law that says that they can't. It's just not really done.
That's not nice....not nice at all.Originally posted by nivek517@May 2nd, 2004 - 12:18 am
Thank you, Alexandria, for attempting to keep the forum the way it was designed to be. Unfortunately, some people can't read (much less write....), and therefore, are not getting the message and continue posting negative comments about other members just because they don't agree with them.
I think that while this may well technically be the case for Prince Charles, it'd cause any amount of bad publicity for the church if it did happen. There aren't many people who are going to believe that his involvement with Mrs Parker Bowles had nothing to do with the collapse of his marriage. If he's allowed to marry a woman with whom he was so heavily involved while he was married to his previous wife, there's no reason why the same shouldn't apply to anyone. And if it's seen that a special case is being made for leniency to the one person who should be held to the highest of standards, the church might as well give up its standards altogether in this particular area.Originally posted by wymanda@May 1st, 2004 - 9:35 pm
Sara,
You obviously aren't aware that there are changes afoot in the Church of England which will allow divorcees to remarry with the blessing of the church. As, in the eyes of the church, Charles is considered a widower and his involvment with Camilla did not cause the failure of her marriage they would be allowed to marry in church.
The thing is that he is considered, in the eyes of the church, as a widower and so whatever caused the breakup of his marriage would not be considered relevant.Originally posted by Elspeth@May 3rd, 2004 - 12:26 pm
There aren't many people who are going to believe that his involvement with Mrs Parker Bowles had nothing to do with the collapse of his marriage. If he's allowed to marry a woman with whom he was so heavily involved while he was married to his previous wife, there's no reason why the same shouldn't apply to anyone.
The thing is that he is considered, in the eyes of the church, as a widower and so whatever caused the breakup of his marriage would not be considered relevant.
The circumstantial evidence of Camilla's former husband having remarried very quickly after their divorce became final (possiblity that he was involved with another woman) would be considered as the reason their marriage broke down rather than her involvement with Charles.
I think that the British public would prefer the situation to be cleared up (he either marries her or ends the relationship) rather than the current situation where she is "neither fish nor fowl" (as my great grandma used to say).
i would agree it!Originally posted by tiaraprin@May 28th, 2004 - 8:03 pm
CAMILLA CAN NEVER BE PRINCESS OF WALES!! NO ONE WILL STAND FOR IT!! She should just get some forgettable subsidary title from the Queen or Charles. You cannot replace a beautiful swan with an ugly "ROTTWEILER" who is a home wrecker!!!
I agree; and if she marries Charles the title of Princess of Wales is her's by right. Diana was not the first Priness of Wales and she certainly wont be the last. She wasted her opportunity in the job and now it is someone elses chance to have a go.Originally posted by carlota@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 pm
poor camilla! you are being so rude with her.
she really loves charles... maybe she deserves an opportunity.
I agree; and if she marries Charles the title of Princess of Wales is her's by right. Diana was not the first Priness of Wales and she certainly wont be the last. She wasted her opportunity in the job and now it is someone elses chance to have a go.Originally posted by wymanda+May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 am--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (wymanda @ May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 am)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-carlota@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 pm
poor camilla! you are being so rude with her.
she really loves charles... maybe she deserves an opportunity.
I think your comments regarding Camilla are both invalid and very unfair. It takes two people to make a marriage, it also takes two people to wreck one. Diana was not some blameless creature. She grew up closley with the Royals, she knew what she was getting into. She also had her fair share of affairs and don't get me started on the way she manipulated the press. Lets just say she puts Victoria Beckham to shame!! As for Charles remarrying, there is nothing constitutionally to stop him. It was the government of the day that stopped the Duke of Windsor marrying Wallis. I would say, something has to be said officially so we know exactly what kind of role he (Charles) sees Camilla having either now or in the future.
I don't think so. I stand by my comments. While Diana made some mistakes, Charles was the one at the Altar LYING in front of everyone!! Just because Diana had some closeness to the Royal Family, they still don't let even their closest friends see all!! Camilla and Charles were committing adultery long before Diana met James Hewitt--and who could blame her for needing comfort and support being stuck with a man like that!! Camilla deserves no sympathy--she knew what she was doing and did not care!Originally posted by Georgia@May 29th, 2004 - 3:17 am
I think your comments regarding Camilla are both invalid and very unfair. It takes two people to make a marriage, it also takes two people to wreck one. Diana was not some blameless creature. She grew up closley with the Royals, she knew what she was getting into. She also had her fair share of affairs and don't get me started on the way she manipulated the press. Lets just say she puts Victoria Beckham to shame!! As for Charles remarrying, there is nothing constitutionally to stop him. It was the government of the day that stopped the Duke of Windsor marrying Wallis. I would say, something has to be said officially so we know exactly what kind of role he (Charles) sees Camilla having either now or in the future.
No Julian I won't get over it! Diana will never be forgotten and I do not appreciate being told my comments are stupid--maybe you should get over it!Originally posted by Julian@May 29th, 2004 - 1:44 pm
your comments are not only invalid but also stupid and evasive. All people like you ever do anytime this issue of Charles and Camilla in the present is raised is start whinging on about a woman who has been dead for SIX YEARS, to continue blaming for the ongoing behaviours and situation of two other adults. Get over it already.
i disagree, wymanda!Originally posted by sara1981+May 29th, 2004 - 10:10 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sara1981 @ May 29th, 2004 - 10:10 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by wymanda@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 am
<!--QuoteBegin-carlota@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 pm
poor camilla! you are being so rude with her.
she really loves charles... maybe she deserves an opportunity.
I agree; and if she marries Charles the title of Princess of Wales is her's by right. Diana was not the first Priness of Wales and she certainly wont be the last. She wasted her opportunity in the job and now it is someone elses chance to have a go.
CAMILLA FOR PRINCESS OF WALES B) B) B)
Sara,Originally posted by wymanda+May 29th, 2004 - 10:57 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (wymanda @ May 29th, 2004 - 10:57 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by sara1981@May 29th, 2004 - 10:10 pm
Originally posted by wymanda@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 am
<!--QuoteBegin-carlota@May 29th, 2004 - 5:29 pm
poor camilla! you are being so rude with her.
she really loves charles... maybe she deserves an opportunity.
I agree; and if she marries Charles the title of Princess of Wales is her's by right. Diana was not the first Priness of Wales and she certainly wont be the last. She wasted her opportunity in the job and now it is someone elses chance to have a go.
CAMILLA FOR PRINCESS OF WALES B) B) B)
i disagree, wymanda!
Camilla cant become Princess of Wales because many people would hurt feelings of famous Diana,Princess of Wales following British law!
Sara Boyce
Ok Julian, I respect your beliefs but I reserve the right to disagree--the great thing about being an American is you can respect someone's beliefs but not share them.Originally posted by Julian@May 29th, 2004 - 6:29 pm
tiaraprin, I wasn't addressing my remark at you. Look at the flow of the thread. Look at who I quoted. Diana never being forgotten and what goes on in the present with two other people are two very different and separate issues as far as I'm concerned. They should only be viewed by their own characters and actions in the present, should bear responsibility for the entirety of their lives rather than their situation being laid continuously at Diana's feet. Responsiblity for one's life begins and ends mainly at one's own front door.