The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 11-01-2005, 06:39 AM
susan alicia's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,527
well, Charles has to take them as he finds them and that might be why is job is soooooooo difficult



Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
......... I find American journalists tend to forget their place.
  #102  
Old 11-01-2005, 07:51 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
I find American journalists tend to forget their place.
Just because Britain used to lay claim on a portion of the land that is now part of United Stated, doesn't mean the decendents and other immigrants in the 200+ years should automatically understand their "place" in the eyes of British Royals. The journalists are just doing their job trying to explain in basic terms what the royals do and why. There are many people in US and around the world, whose lives don't involved meeting or even reading about royals on a daily basis, nor living with a strict social structure that puts people in their place since birth.
  #103  
Old 11-01-2005, 08:14 AM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,010
PETA growling over Charles' visit

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9546079/
  #104  
Old 11-01-2005, 09:30 AM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,010
here's a short video from an american station about C and C's visit. the commentary is the usual same old same old.but its got some nice images to look at...

http://video.msn.com/v/us/v.htm?g=88...8&t=&f=06/64&p=
  #105  
Old 11-01-2005, 10:21 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: newyork, United States
Posts: 479
Apparently, they'll be at the world trade center after 12:00 today.
  #106  
Old 11-01-2005, 10:53 AM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,010
Charles faces 'cash-for-access' row over US tour engagements

http://news.independent.co.uk/people...icle323782.ece


PRINCE CHARLES IS FOND OF ISLAM, SCOLDS AMERICANS

http://www.michnews.com/artman/publi...le_10131.shtml


Charles and Camilla to go straight to Ground Zero

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...853431,00.html


Prince Charles to visit the Edible Schoolyard

http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivall...ews/ci_3171122
  #107  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:11 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
I find American journalists tend to forget their place.
LOL...since I live here I am finding even our tabloids are behaving in a most respectable manner when reporting any news regarding their visit.

We tend NOT to treat foreign visitors, royal or not, with hostility while they are in our country on official business.

While they are visiting we do not protest, threaten, throw things at, verbally assault, swear at, make fun of like a bunch of children, etc.

We allow them to do what they came here for, whether we agree or not agree.

It is called diplomacy. Anything less tampers with relations.
  #108  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:20 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
I don't understand this stuff about Charles not working for a living. A lot of rich Americans whose basic income is inherited and coming from income from investments are doing the same thing he is, with their dedication to charity work and work in society along the lines of Charles's invovlement with Poundbury. As the 60-minutes segment said, he acts as an ambassador for British goods, services, and values by carrying out tours arranged by the Foreign Office. How is this different from the way a lot of well-connected friends of the US President of the day conduct their lives with no criticism from mainstream journalists?
  #109  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:22 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,861
Re:

Quote:
We tend NOT to treat foreign visitors, royal or not, with hostility while they are in our country on official business.
How very welcoming.

Quote:
While they are visiting we do not protest, threaten, throw things at, verbally assault, swear at, make fun of like a bunch of children, etc.
Really? I've been hearing an interview with a woman from 'The Diana Circle' being played all day saying how she will be protesting loudly at every avaliable opportunity whilst Their Royal Highness's are in America. I admit that they don't represent a majority but can't the mighty forces of America move them on?
__________________
Kaye aka BeatrixFan
  #110  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:25 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
I agree for the most part Elspeth.

He does work. He works his backside off. I may not have agreed with everything he has done in his life, but I admire and respect the hard work and dedication he has to his role ans to the Monarchy.

But, I think maybe what the journalist from 60 Minutes was trying to say, and poorly, is that a royal does not work in the traditional sense like us commoners. Edward and Sophie tried to be both royal and work at normal jobs and as we saw, were not able to do both so they had to pick.

I do not think it was meant to angled: Prince Charles does not work, does not have to work, etc.

I think part of the problem is the journalist from 60 Minutes did not do his research properly.
  #111  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:26 AM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
Really? I've been hearing an interview with a woman from 'The Diana Circle' being played all day saying how she will be protesting loudly at every avaliable opportunity whilst Their Royal Highness's are in America. I admit that they don't represent a majority but can't the mighty forces of America move them on?
It depends how seriously the mighty forces of America take the US Constitution. The mighty forces of Singapore or Libya would be moving them on. Western democracies, on the whole, think freedom of speech is a good thing rather than a bad thing. For one thing, it lets people sit on computers criticising the government and society, which wouldn't be allowed in countries where the mighty forces are too scared of the opinions of individuals to allow them to be aired.
  #112  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:28 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,861
Re:

There is such a thing as public decency. If they want to protest then let them, but they should do it far away from TRH so as not to cause a scene. It creates a bad impression and lets face it, America needs all the good PR it can get right now.
__________________
Kaye aka BeatrixFan
  #113  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:28 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatrixFan
How very welcoming.



Really? I've been hearing an interview with a woman from 'The Diana Circle' being played all day saying how she will be protesting loudly at every avaliable opportunity whilst Their Royal Highness's are in America. I admit that they don't represent a majority but can't the mighty forces of America move them on?
That is one person and one VERY small group of people.

I will not debate, nor allow you to lead me into an argument with you, of any kind, and break any of the forum rules.

May I remind you how a certain person was treated in your country in November of 2003?
  #114  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:29 AM
BeatrixFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,861
Re:

Quote:
May I remind you how a certain person was treated in your country in November of 2003?
Please do.
__________________
Kaye aka BeatrixFan
  #115  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:33 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
Anyway, to move one to what this forum is really about, which is not ripping each other's countries apart.

Are the Prince and Duchess getting in later today, or this evening?
  #116  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:38 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
{Removed response to off-topic post - Elspeth}

Are the Prince and Duchess going to visit New Orleans for sure?
  #117  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:40 AM
pollyemma's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,010
I believe New Orleans has been scrapped.
  #118  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:44 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyemma
I believe New Orleans has been scrapped.
Thank you, pollyemma, for answering my question.

We are hoping another member on here, ysbel, who works across the street from where they will be today in New York will be able to get some pictures and then post them on here.
  #119  
Old 11-01-2005, 11:59 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,629
Does anyone know if reporters will be able to ask the royal couple questions, and if they have planned any walkabouts to meet and greet the people?
  #120  
Old 11-01-2005, 12:13 PM
Layla1971's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,613
I haven't read all of the posts so this schedule may have been posted already, but the latest is that the couple will be in New York to visit Ground Zero and the UN, then go to Washington for lunch and dinner with the president, and finishing with 2 days in San Fransisco.
__________________
In critical moments even the powerful have need of the weakest.
Aesop

Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, official visit, prince charles, prince of wales, united states


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall: Tour of Canada - November 2-12, 2009 Skydragon King Charles III and Queen Camilla 226 01-23-2010 02:59 AM
Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall: Visit to Turkey - November 25-30, 2007 milla Ca King Charles III and Queen Camilla 34 11-30-2007 02:43 AM
Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall Current Events 3: June-July 2005 Elspeth Current Events Archive 167 07-28-2005 11:30 AM
Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall Current Events 2: May-June 2005 Elspeth Current Events Archive 210 06-21-2005 09:47 AM
Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall Current Events 1: April 9, 2005-May 2005 Elspeth Current Events Archive 196 05-11-2005 10:30 PM




Popular Tags
#princedubai #rashidmrm abolished monarchies all tags america arcadie arcadie claret british caroline charles iii claret current events danish royal family defunct thrones denmark duarte pio edward vii elizabeth ii emperor naruhito fabio bevilacqua fallen empires fallen kingdom genealogy general news grace kelly grimaldi hamdan bin ahmed harry history hollywood hotel room for sale house of gonzaga introduction jewels jordan royal family king king charles king willem-alexander leopold ier matrilineal monaco monarchy need help new zealand; cyclone gabrielle official visit order of precedence order of the redeemer pamela hicks portugal preferences prince albert monaco prince christian princess of orange queen queen alexandra queen camilla queen elizabeth ii queen margrethe ii queen mathilde queen maxima republics restoration royal without thrones silk spain spanish royal family state visit to germany switzerland visit william


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises