Australian
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2004
- Messages
- 2,149
- City
- Perth
- Country
- Australia
Queen Katherine said:Camilla is the Duchess of Prudence.
I'm baffled by this statement. Can you enlighten us?
Queen Katherine said:Camilla is the Duchess of Prudence.
Australian said:I'm baffled by this statement. Can you enlighten us?
shaan said:Since her marriage in april 2005 somehow camilla seems to have taken over the limelight quite well and is getting on with it - do you think that people are beginning to appreciate her a lot more and is she becoming more and more popular now than ever before.
lauren grace said:Charles and Camilla are a perfect pair....I wish them Peace in their life together.
Frothy said:I do hope the Prince of Wales will change what his wife is to be known as when he suceeds to the throne, then my opinion of him will rise yet further.
Madame Royale said:Lets not get that discussion running again.lol. That was well documented some time back and almost a thread in length (or so it seemed).
We know the reality and legalities of the situation so lets just wait and see
marian said:I have a question: Is true that when Camila was married with Andrew Parker Bowles, thay had a catholic wedding? Is true is? Is Camila catholic or only Andrew? I know that prince Charles is anglican, and, of course, he is crown prince, and for this, he could not married with a catholic.
ysbel said:Yes, there's a thread about what Camilla's title will be when Charles ascends the throne. Its still open as far as I can tell, so anybody can continue the discussion there. There's no reason why the discussion of Camilla's title should be offlimits in the forum but its easier to follow if its in the right thread.
Frothy said:Technically you don't have to agree to raise the children in the faith, at least not anymore. Maybe it was so when C married A P-B. These days, the Catholic partner must promise a priest with the non-Catholic partner present that s/he will do their best to raise the children Catholic. The non-Catholic does not need to agree to it. I know having married a non-Catholic myself recently and been through it!
Camilla could not have married Charles had she been Catholic and we all recall it wound up as only a civil wedding. She has been taken to the country's hearts since then!
BeatrixFan said:The rest just tagged along to be a part of the mayhem and the headlines.
Well considering that the Church of England arose from a split from the Roman Catholic Church over the "Divorce" of the King of England, my guess is that they will definitely get over it!Jaya said:Will those ecumenical laws be revised to accomodate circumstance? I have read a great article on www.lovemarks.com by an Elizabeth UK. just wanted to know if anyone had any ideas out there about this.
Jaya said:I have no problem with Charles and Camilla BUT I am wondering if Prince Charles has missed a point or two.
Firstly, being heir presumptive is a "calling" not a job at all.Perhaps he should not call his family the firm as they do not have jobs but "callings"
That is why the controversy of divorce was so profound.
Apparently, in the coronation ceremony the high unction of the church is bestowed on the royal being crowned. The high unction cannot be bestowed on a divorced royal,because it indicates that the the royal was common enough not to be "called" and rise above their personal desire. This was the actual religious problem with Edward.Also the King should be able to give the sacrament but I am not ceratain. The king shows that he has been called for catalysis.
None of us dislike The Duchess but what of the coronation ? How credible will it be? Will those ecumenical laws be revised to accomodate circumstance? I have read a great article on www.lovemarks.com by an Elizabeth UK. just wanted to know if anyone had any ideas out there about this.
If they are happy may they live happily ever after.
well then may we live happily and they have all the happiness in the world.chrissy57 said:NB Charles is NOT the heir presumptive. He is the heir apparent.
An heir presumptive can be replaced in the order of succession e.g. his mother was heiress presumptive because, until she became queen, she could have been replaced in the line of succession by a younger brother.
Charles can't be replaced by anyone and therefore is the heir apparent (of which there can only be one as the term is singular).
Jaya said:well then may we live happily and they have all the happiness in the world.