 |
|

05-09-2008, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Paul Burrell will NOT be charged with perjury apparently and the investigation has been concluded. The reason given is that there is insufficient evidence!
|

05-09-2008, 12:51 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Well isn't a video an evidence of his "red herrings" as he said ? This is very unfair. They almost made the Queen, Prince Charles and the whole RF come to the Inquest and this disgusting man isn't forced to go and explain himself ?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTruth
|
Pictures of the event :
Pic 1 * Pic 2 *
|

05-09-2008, 02:29 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: City, Kazakhstan
Posts: 8,009
|
|
Great photos of stunning Rachida Dati!   I am pleased to know that the line has been drawn in this case.
|

05-09-2008, 03:42 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
Probably the LAST thing anyone wants is to give Paul Burrell a chance to perjure himself again...and again...and dish dirt--which might or might not be true. I think that they're letting sleeping dogs lie; or maybe there's been a quiet deal made with Mr. Burrell that we'll hear about later.
|

05-09-2008, 06:23 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
I'm shocked actually..but best nothing start I suppose, I wouldn't want to hear more lies then I already have from him.
|

05-09-2008, 06:45 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
I have to disagree with the opinion that it's better to do nothing so as to keep it quiet. I'm not afraid to hear other hideous things on Diana, that's what covered the newspapers for the past 10 years so I assume we are getting used to it anyway. I feel like we've been turning around Burrell forever and it would be the unique occasion to show to everyone that this man is a pure and simple liar and that he created a lot of problems with his conspiracy theories and secret letters coming from nowhere. He should be punished for the lies he told and for his dirty work with Diana's personal belongings.
|

05-09-2008, 07:01 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
^True so much has already been revealed about Diana, guess it wouldn't bother me but I meant I wouldn't want to start up anything as in more conspiracy theories and such.But then again if it could prove that many of the conpsiracy theorists were wrong then that would be a great opportunity.
|

05-09-2008, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Yes, it's what comes from it that will show us if it was worth it. We have the video to support the idea of lies and it's a great start. If they dig a little more, I'm sure they could find terrible evidences of his game. I believe that Burrell encouraged those conspiracy theories so that Diana's "spirit" would never die. When you look at some pictures, even some with his wife ( picture 1, 2 ), it's obvious that these people were very close and I think he never accepted that time would eventually let Diana vanish from the spotlight. (and him at the same time  )
|

05-09-2008, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
|

05-10-2008, 02:30 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
Sorta random but after all this time I still found myself sitting tonight going but what if it's all a lie suppose we'll never know, then I thought of the effort, preparation, the aftermath etc could they pull it off? And then I thought about it and came to the conclusion that all we have is the evidence some people choose to beleive it others don't and beleive it's all been a huge cover up for me I guess they'll always be that little doubt in the back of my mind and I don't know why. I guess after so many years of beleiving one thing it's sorta hard to drastically change your mind. I mean from what I saw over the past 6 months or so I'd say accident but then you always have that little thing going but what if. Sorry I know it was kinda weird I sorta just switched the topic but it's been in my mind all night and I felt like expressing myself.
|

05-10-2008, 05:47 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
I must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing. For example, the letter she wrote about Charles willing to kill her ; I'm not sure what to think about it. Is it true or is it just Burrell ? And Diana's personality and character doesn't help us at all either. She seemed so humor-unbalanced (Borderline disorder ?) that it's very hard to tell if she could have done it or not. Her friend, Lucia Flecha de Lima told she could never have written such things :
Source : Telegraph
Quote:
During questioning on Tuesday, the letter was shown to Lucia Flecha da Lima, the wife of the former Brazilian ambassador to London and one of the princess's closest confidantes. She said that the princess had never expressed fears for her safety.
"I still don't believe in it," she said. "Paul Burrell was perfectly capable of imitating Princess Diana's handwriting. I don't believe she was fearing for her life, especially from Prince Charles, the future king of your country."
|
|

05-10-2008, 11:50 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
We need to put the "Charles murder plot" in its context. The letter that is mentioned in the Paget Report stated that the targets were to be Diana and Camilla so that Charles could marry Tiggy Legge-Bourke. If Diana really did think this at the time we can put it down to a moment of stress as no-one could possibly take such a claim seriously.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

05-10-2008, 11:53 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
I agree Warren. And she wrote it in 1993, i.e. nothing near the time of her death.
|

05-10-2008, 01:26 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
Yes; and by the time she died, she might have forgotten that she ever wrote it--if she in fact did write it.
|

05-10-2008, 04:26 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
Ya I don't think it was something she actually meant if she did write it.
Quote:
I must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing.
|
Thanks, good to know I'm not the only one who feels like that sometimes.
|

05-10-2008, 07:49 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 70
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTruthI must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing. For example, the letter she wrote about Charles willing to kill her ; I'm not sure what to think about it. Is it true or is it just Burrell ? And Diana's personality and character doesn't help us at all either. [COLOR=royalblue
She seemed so humor-unbalanced (Borderline disorder ?)[/COLOR] that it's very hard to tell if she could have done it or not. Her friend, Lucia Flecha de Lima told she could never have written such things
|
Can you clarify why believe "humor-unbalanced" means that Diana had Borderline Personality Disorder?
Am I mistaken or was there a letter written in Diana's hand on KP stationary re: a plot to kill her or cause an incapacitating head injury?
|

05-11-2008, 05:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by judith14011
Can you clarify why believe "humor-unbalanced" means that Diana had Borderline Personality Disorder?
|
Well it was said many times that this kind of disorder is very common and is characterized by some sudden change of humor, going from cries to laughs and vice-versa. Diana could be subject to that due to the apparent trauma she had from her parents separation :
Quote:
Many individuals with BPD report having had a history of abuse, neglect, or separation as young children.
|
Her eating disorder may also be related to this problem :
Quote:
Comorbid (co-occurring) conditions in BPD are common. When comparing individuals diagnosed with BPD to those diagnosed with other kinds of personality disorders, the former showed a higher rate of also meeting criteria for:
- anxiety disorders
- mood disorders (including clinical depression and bipolar disorder)
- eating disorders (including anorexia nervosa and bulimia)
and, to a lesser extent, somatoform disorders
- dissociative disorders; if all DSM criteria are met, it is recommended that the person should also be tested to have Dissociative Identity Disorder.
Substance abuse is a common problem in BPD, whether due to impulsivity or as a coping mechanism, and 50% to 70% of psychiatric inpatients with BPD have been found to meet criteria for a substance use disorder.
|
We know that Diana was far from being the most relaxed person in the world and we also know about her mood changes. So I believe my assertion is far from being unfounded.
May I also precise that Diana had been given some antidepressants while pregnant of William. She refused to take them, fearing for the health of the baby :
Borderline personality disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
However no medical record give us the right to say she had this disorder, hence the interrogation sign at the end on my sentence.
|

05-11-2008, 08:01 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Posts: 105
|
|
Just think people diana`s death wasn`t due to paparazzi`s if it was, then the most important moment for the paparazzi`s was to catch was when the car had accident just think!!!!!they would have taken so much pix that was a very important time for the paparazzis to have a photo of a great car crash of Diana.
|

05-11-2008, 08:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Well they did take a lot of pictures but all were confined or destroyed. It was proven that they were behind the car and didn't hesitate to have a dangerous behavior to get their pictures.
|

05-11-2008, 08:21 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: WM, United States
Posts: 371
|
|
I believe there were photos taken of the accident, and of the occupants of the car immediately following the crash. However, no editor would touch them once it was announced Diana had died IIRC.
Cat
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|