The Diana Inquest: October 2007 - April 2008 - Page 70

ghost_night554 · #**1381** 03-04-2008, 05:26 PM

I must have been around 6 but I never really understood how she died. Anyways ya most of the footage from the accident I've seen is more recently so I imagine they don't show as many clips as they did back then. I totally forgot about Trevor ya it could have been him too I'm not sure obviously lol

I don't get today's evidence with Henri Paul and the CCTV footage are they trying to say he never personally spoke to Dodi about the plan and that he had actually changed outfits from his morning shift? That's all I could seem to place together. Did anyone actually understand what they meant?

georgiea · #**1382** 03-04-2008, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost_night554

Georgiea did you receive my PM? I wasn't sure if it went through. If not I can try again to send it to you.

Yes, thank you ghost_night. I think Diana, Princess of Wales only loved Prince Charles in her short life.

BeatrixFan · #**1383** 03-04-2008, 05:59 PM

Oh I think she loved Hasnat Khan. You don't have a 2 year relationship with someone if you don't love them.

ghost_night554 · #**1384** 03-04-2008, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Yes, thank you ghost_night.

No problem

pinkie40 · #**1385** 03-05-2008, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sirhon11234

I remember seeing her on the stetcher on t.v. that night and I'm surprised that a picture exists. The photo of the Princess in a coffin has to be a rumour.
The inquest report did not state she also had a broken neck, she was moving her head side to side when she trapped in the car.

I've never seen gurney photo....I saw the ambulance arriving at the hospital with the paramedics working on her.

Yes, you are correct that the list of injuries do not mention a broken neck....and thus another reason I believe in some sort of "cover-up" sadly. They also don't mention the massive injury on the top of her head...but from the photos I detect as much and the American couple who passed the wreck said Diana's head was on the dashboard and not slumped in the passenger seat floor well.

So many things that don't add up, unfortunately, that could make this just the simple accident where everyone (including me) is satisfied and others rest in peace....

ghost_night554 · #**1386** 03-05-2008, 02:07 AM

I don't remember seeing any real head injury in the pictures, I do remember her head being a little weird but I just assumed that quite possibly it could have just been the angle of the photo.

Skydragon · #**1387** 03-05-2008, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinkie40

I've never seen gurney photo....I saw the ambulance arriving at the hospital with the paramedics working on her.

Yes, you are correct that the list of injuries do not mention a broken neck....and thus another reason I believe in some sort of "cover-up" sadly. They also don't mention the massive injury on the top of her head...but from the photos I detect as much and the American couple who passed the wreck said Diana's head was on the dashboard and not slumped in the passenger seat floor well.

So many things that don't add up, unfortunately, that could make this just the simple accident where everyone (including me) is satisfied and others rest in peace....

The photo's I saw, all back up the claim that she was half in the footwell, the pictures clearly showed them helping her back on to the seat. From the pictures I saw on the programme and on the net, there was no massive head injury, (no massive blood loss which would come with such an injury) and as with many people who are unconscious, her head was lolling forward and to the side. Eve Pollard, who saw some of the pictures sent from the scene on that night, stated that there was just a small trickle of blood coming from the temple, no visible injuries, that is one of the reasons the editors were so shocked when it was announced she had died.

Emmily · #**1388** 03-05-2008, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skydragon

The photo's I saw, all back up the claim that she was half in the footwell, the pictures clearly showed them helping her back on to the seat. From the pictures I saw on the programme and on the net, there was no massive head injury, (no massive blood loss which would come with such an injury) and as with many people who are unconscious, her head was lolling forward and to the side. Eve Pollard, who saw some of the pictures sent from the scene on that night, stated that there was just a small trickle of blood coming from the temple, no visible injuries, that is one of the reasons the editors were so shocked when it was announced she had died.

Exactly. Wasn't there a french doctor who ran to the car after the accident? I'm sorry but I don't remember his name. He said he looked in the car and tried to treat Trevor first because it was obvious Dodi and Henri Paul were dead. He said from looking at Diana ( and he was unaware this was Princess Diana until the next morning) he thought she was the least seriously injured of the two that survived the crash. There were no obvious, physical exterior injuries.

Emmily · #**1389** 03-05-2008, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinkie40

I've never seen gurney photo....I saw the ambulance arriving at the hospital with the paramedics working on her.

Yes, you are correct that the list of injuries do not mention a broken neck....and thus another reason I believe in some sort of "cover-up" sadly. They also don't mention the massive injury on the top of her head...but from the photos I detect as much and the American couple who passed the wreck said Diana's head was on the dashboard and not slumped in the passenger seat floor well.

So many things that don't add up, unfortunately, that could make this just the simple accident where everyone (including me) is satisfied and others rest in peace....

The reason there was no mention of a massive injury on the top of her head or a broken neck was because those were not injuries that she had. Not because there was a cover up. She was not found with her head on the dashboard of the car. She was in the well of the back seat facing the opposite direction.

iowabelle · #**1390** 03-05-2008, 03:32 PM

Just a thought... about the idea that Tony Blair plotted with the Queen to get rid of Diana (which a member mentioned their mother thinking was a possibility). I always had the impression that Tony Blair planned to exploit Diana and her image for his own ends, thus it wouldn't have benefited him to do away with her.

Just to emphasize: I don't think the Queen or TB had anything to do with the accident.

Mermaid1962 · #**1391** 03-05-2008, 04:00 PM

Exactly. Tony Blair and Diana were similar in that they were quite adept with the media. They would have been sympatico.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iowabelle

I always had the impression that Tony Blair planned to exploit Diana and her image for his own ends, thus it wouldn't have benefited him to do away with her.

Mermaid1962 · #**1392** 03-05-2008, 04:05 PM

Perhaps the head they saw was Trevor's. He's quite fair skinned, like Diana and was damaged by the windshield--which would have put him in the vicinity of the dashboard. When the folks passed the wreck, they probably wouldn't have even known that Diana was in the accident and thought that it was her only in retrospect.

It could even have been Henri Paul, because he would have been quite pale after the accident.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinkie40

I've never seen gurney photo....I saw the ambulance arriving at the hospital with the paramedics working on her.

Yes, you are correct that the list of injuries do not mention a broken neck....and thus another reason I believe in some sort of "cover-up" sadly. They also don't mention the massive injury on the top of her head...but from the photos I detect as much and the American couple who passed the wreck said Diana's head was on the dashboard and not slumped in the passenger seat floor well.

So many things that don't add up, unfortunately, that could make this just the simple accident where everyone (including me) is satisfied and others rest in peace....

ghost_night554 · #**1393** 03-05-2008, 07:59 PM

Ah yes the Tony Blair thing with my mother yes that was me. I actually always thought had she lived longer they would have gotten along and would have as you sorta mentioned benefited from each other in some way(using each other). I just don't believe in any way the Queen or TB had anything to do with her death.

Mermaid1962 · #**1394** 03-05-2008, 09:51 PM

No, neither do I. I think that whenever there's a tragic accident, there will always be "unanswered questions." That's the nature of sudden death.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost_night554

I just don't believe in any way the Queen or TB had anything to do with her death.

PadThaiPrincess · #**1395** 03-05-2008, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mermaid1962

No, neither do I. I think that whenever there's a tragic accident, there will always be "unanswered questions." That's the nature of sudden death.

I think this is part of the reason I'm so skeptical about any sort of outcome the inquest might have.

ghost_night554 · #**1396** 03-05-2008, 10:43 PM

Exactly that's what I've been trying to explain to some of my friends....with these types of death there's always pieces of the puzzle you can't solve.

BeatrixFan · #**1397** 03-05-2008, 11:29 PM

Allow me.

Puzzle piece 1 - the driver was drunk.
Puzzle piece 2 - the car crashed.
Puzzle piece 3 - Diana wasn't wearing a seatbelt.
Puzzle piece 4 - Diana died.

It's that simple.

ghost_night554 · #**1398** 03-05-2008, 11:42 PM

lol My question for the day is where do you think the Fiat Uno came from since we don't know if it followed the Mercedes all the way through or joined at the slip road entry. I personally think had it been following the Mercedes the whole way through it would have been noticed/reported by someone,somehow,someway and from what I've read no one noticed a Fiat Uno until they got closer to the underpass which makes me think it came from the slip road entry. That's how it's portrayed in most of the recreations I've seen.

BeatrixFan · #**1399** 03-06-2008, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost_night554

lol My question for the day is where do you think the Fiat Uno came from since we don't know if it followed the Mercedes all the way through or joined at the slip road entry. I personally think had it been following the Mercedes the whole way through it would have been noticed/reported by someone,somehow,someway and from what I've read no one noticed a Fiat Uno until they got closer to the underpass which makes me think it came from the slip road entry. That's how it's portrayed in most of the recreations I've seen.

Cars drive on roads. A Fiat Uno is a car. That was driving. It doesn't matter where it joined, go to any busy motorway and you'll see cars driving alongside other cars. Sometimes they collide, sometimes they dont. Depends on how friendly you are with the big man upstairs.

ghost_night554 · #**1400** 03-06-2008, 01:09 AM

Ya that's a given but I was in my little conspiracy theorist mind when I wrote my question. Obviously that's not the case with the Fiat Uno but I had a sudden urge to ask. I don't like thinking of it as anything more then an accident but sometimes I can't help it.