 |
|

07-24-2007, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Social Norms: Diana and Staff
i'm sure someone out there could answer this.
some of you may recall the story about Diana being set straight about popping into the kitchen (at BP prior to the wedding and i believe it happened again on Brittanica although i could be wrong about the that one)and being told that it wasn't appropriate.
would something like this actually happen(telling her it was inappropriate)? i would think that the average person would be thrilled that a future princess/queen would take the time to come and meet people that run the household.
__________________
__________________
Duchess
|

07-24-2007, 05:24 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 760
|
|
As I understand it, a one-time pop-in to meet & greet was fine.
Unexpected frequent appearances made the staff feel uncomfortable.
__________________
__________________
aka Janet on some other forums
|

07-24-2007, 05:53 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4
As I understand it, a one-time pop-in to meet & greet was fine.
Unexpected frequent appearances made the staff feel uncomfortable.
|
i suppose at first you'd be nervous, but given time i'd think they grow to be more comfortable with it. perhaps not happy...but more comfortable.
__________________
Duchess
|

07-24-2007, 05:54 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My Home, United States
Posts: 698
|
|
Really? Hmm...thinking over it, yes, I can see where it would make them feel uncomfortable. Did she really? I mean, pop in and out of the kitchen just to meet with staff??? Had never heard of that.
|

07-24-2007, 06:09 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelD
Really? Hmm...thinking over it, yes, I can see where it would make them feel uncomfortable. Did she really? I mean, pop in and out of the kitchen just to meet with staff??? Had never heard of that.
|
i can't remember exactly when it happened (either just before the wedding while she was living at BP or while on honeymoon aboard Britannica). whenever it was she was politely told that it inappropriate.
__________________
Duchess
|

07-24-2007, 06:09 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
can anyone enlighten me as to the relationship between servant and master/mistress?
__________________
Duchess
|

07-24-2007, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelD
Did she really? I mean, pop in and out of the kitchen just to meet with staff??? Had never heard of that.
|
Yes, she did. I think it's in the Sarah Bradford's book, Diana. She was very lonely in BP and Charles was gone most of the time (don't get me wrong, I don't blame him for that). She was borred so she went to meet some of the staff. She often came after tea time and have a chat with a few people there. One person (refered as : "A senior member of the Queen's mother household") wasn't okay with the idea and she had heard about it. One day he came into the kitchen where she was and she said (I have Sarah's book beside me so  ) : "You don't approve me being here, do you ?"
"No, Your Royal Highness, I don't. Not at all. This is servants' quarters, you should be in the saloon learning your crafts."
(From Sarah Bradford's book, Diana, all rights reserved lol. Don't want any problems with the law  )
I don't think it was an enormous problem that Diana (who wasn't, by the way, already princess) had a little chat with the staff which continued to do the job properly so why being fussy about it ?!
|

07-25-2007, 07:01 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Apart from anything else, it stops the staff from doing what they are supposed to be doing, it can really delay them and of course it will be the staff that get into trouble when they are late.
It is always wise to keep a distance, however small, between you and your staff. IMO. They would look on you differently, if you are too familiar, how can you respect your employer if you have seen them 'mucking' about in the kitchen or listened to them being indiscreet about others in the household?
|

07-25-2007, 07:21 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,377
|
|
I think Stephen Barry mentioned in his book Royal Service that on her honeymoon on the Britannia Diana had the habit of going below decks to the servants quarters and the crew begged her not to bring Charles because if Charles were around, they would have to act formal and on their best behavior.
I don't remember if Barry mentioned anyone disapproving of Diana's actions though I would imagine their bosses might be concerned just for the sake of appearances about the crew spending that much time with Diana by herself on her honeymoon. Other than that the only objection I can see if they feared that the crew would get so comfortable being informal around Diana in private that they would forget and act the same way towards her in public.
However, when Sarah Barnes was Diana's children's nanny, one of the reasons stated for her departure was that Barnes was used to being treated as a family friend at her former family and felt uncomfortable that Diana treated her as a servant.
So its hard to know what to believe.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
|

07-25-2007, 07:48 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
I think Stephen Barry mentioned in his book Royal Service that on her honeymoon on the Britannia Diana had the habit of going below decks to the servants quarters and the crew begged her not to bring Charles because if Charles were around, they would have to act formal and on their best behavior.
|
You do have to wonder where Charles was during all these visits to the servants quarters on board, most honeymoon couples are hard to part. I would say I have not read Barry's book.
Quote:
I don't remember if Barry mentioned anyone disapproving of Diana's actions though I would imagine their bosses might be concerned just for the sake of appearances about the crew spending that much time with Diana by herself on her honeymoon. Other than that the only objection I can see if they feared that the crew would get so comfortable being informal around Diana in private that they would forget and act the same way towards her in public.
|
The main worry would be if there was an emergency and as you say appearances.
Quote:
However, when Sarah Barnes was Diana's children's nanny, one of the reasons stated for her departure was that Barnes was used to being treated as a family friend at her former family and felt uncomfortable that Diana treated her as a servant.
|
Back to the point I made in the Chronicles thread.
|

07-25-2007, 10:10 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
You do have to wonder where Charles was during all these visits to the servents quarters on board
|
Perhaps reading some van der Post books
|

07-25-2007, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,527
|
|
at least he read books 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTruth
Perhaps reading some van der Post books 
|
|

07-25-2007, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by susan alicia
at least he read books  
|
Could have take a break on his honeymoon don't you think ?
(just kidding  )
|

07-25-2007, 05:16 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
Apart from anything else, it stops the staff from doing what they are supposed to be doing, it can really delay them and of course it will be the staff that get into trouble when they are late.
It is always wise to keep a distance, however small, between you and your staff. IMO. They would look on you differently, if you are too familiar, how can you respect your employer if you have seen them 'mucking' about in the kitchen or listened to them being indiscreet about others in the household?
|
of course...i hadn't thought of those things. thanks for the input.
__________________
Duchess
|

07-25-2007, 05:17 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: xx, Canada
Posts: 1,649
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
I think Stephen Barry mentioned in his book Royal Service that on her honeymoon on the Britannia Diana had the habit of going below decks to the servants quarters and the crew begged her not to bring Charles because if Charles were around, they would have to act formal and on their best behavior.
I don't remember if Barry mentioned anyone disapproving of Diana's actions though I would imagine their bosses might be concerned just for the sake of appearances about the crew spending that much time with Diana by herself on her honeymoon. Other than that the only objection I can see if they feared that the crew would get so comfortable being informal around Diana in private that they would forget and act the same way towards her in public.
However, when Sarah Barnes was Diana's children's nanny, one of the reasons stated for her departure was that Barnes was used to being treated as a family friend at her former family and felt uncomfortable that Diana treated her as a servant.
So its hard to know what to believe.
|
that's it...it was the Barry book. thanks.
__________________
Duchess
|

12-08-2007, 02:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,861
|
|
It's rather like the Government and the Civil Service. Both know that the other one exists but that doesn't mean they ever want to meet or exchange ideas for the better.
__________________
Kaye aka BeatrixFan
|

12-08-2007, 03:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burbank, United States
Posts: 6,398
|
|
This is sort of on topic I guess....... I know a guy who was in the household cavalry in the late 90s and he was an equerry to the Duke of Gloucester. But he and Lady Davina kind of...... dated I guess, and the Duke and Duchess didn't like it because it was crossing a line between professional and personal, so he was dismissed. But the relationship with Davina didn't survive the ordeal. But apparently he still left on reasonably good terms, and holds the highest respect for the Gloucesters. He just calls it "not seeing exactly eye to eye" with them. He talks fondly of his experience, brief as it was. He had a room in KP overlooking Princess Margaret's garden, and he knew Paul Burrell, haha.
|

12-11-2007, 12:14 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 423
|
|
-I can count three servants who waited on Diana who wrote books....Stephen Barry (valet to HRH Prince Charles), Wendy Berry (domestic staff at Highrove, her son worked at Buckingham Palace) and Paul Burrell. I guess I could include Patrick Jephson on that list too.
Then there were the massive number of staff who either left of were dismissed during the Diana years....
|

12-11-2007, 04:01 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkie40
-I can count three servants who waited on Diana who wrote books....Stephen Barry (valet to HRH Prince Charles), Wendy Berry (domestic staff at Highrove, her son worked at Buckingham Palace) and Paul Burrell. I guess I could include Patrick Jephson on that list too.
Then there were the massive number of staff who either left of were dismissed during the Diana years....
|
Didn't that "lady clerk" work during the Diana-years as well?
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
|

09-26-2012, 08:46 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rose Bush, United States
Posts: 5,333
|
|
__________________
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|