MARG
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 10,598
- City
- Christchurch
- Country
- New Zealand
The main point is "I". In this case you. Such evidence belongs in a court of law. Who are you, or I for that matter, to demand the "right" to decide what is and what is not true.zhontella said:More pictures might have allayed some of the suspicions put onto the royal establishment. .......Then I'd like more pictures to determine if Diana was, by some reports, walking around after the accident? I suppose whoever claimed that was ridiculed and mocked into silence.
As I said before, there's no need to twist this into something sick like a morbid fascination with blood and death. That's just another tactic to bully someone into silence.
:::::::::::::::::::
This is not some ghastly Hollywood reality show a-la Anna Nicole Smith. This is a legal inquest into the circumstances surrounding the death of Diana Princess of Wales. Unless we are required by law to present evidence (not speculation) or called to serve on the Jury we have no rights at all.
Just because Tony Blair coined the phrase "The People's Princess" does not make her our next of kin. She did not belong to us in life and she certainly does not belong to us in death.
As for "twisting it into something sick",the facts speak for themselves. Photos of a dead or dying princess were not even deemed suitable as fodder for the tabloids in Britain.
Last edited: