The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #241  
Old 07-03-2021, 07:41 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighGoalHighDreams View Post
Another poster mentioned this, about the events at the unveiling proving the stories about the speeches were wrong, but that is just not so, is it? In fact, the lack of speeches just as easily points to the stories being exactly right.

It could easily be that two speeches were planned, but if one brother was unwilling (or unable) to share the contents of his or participate in rehearsals, a decision was made to scrap the speeches for this ceremony, delaying them until later this year when relations may be better, or else getting rid of them altogether.

We just don't know, but the fact that no speeches were given this week certainly does not demonstrate that there were no speeches planned and difficulty encountered- and in fact may go to show the opposite.

Yet, it could easily be that the report of speeches was erroneous from the beginning.
I base my opinion on the fact that 'reporter' has gotten so much wrong, in the consistent search of royal exclusives.

For instance, there were a plethora of stories post Prince Philip funeral, - both positive & negative, - of summits, snubs, conciliatory meetings, letters e.t.c
All bannered as exclusives which we now know never happened - in some cases straight from the horses mouth.
Some examples:
The Countess of Wessex flat out stating that contrary to reports of angry snubs, she did indeed have a lengthy conversation with Harry after the funeral;
KP telling Robert Lacey in his updated tome that there was no Frogmore meeting;
Sussex people telling Scobie there was no letter to Prince Charles;
Et cetera.

Prince Harry has just landed back in the US and already a new 'exclusive' from the same sources of when he'll be back.

I mean, Harry's 2021 WellChild Awards was moved from the usual Sept to this surprise July date, - an event no paper actually knew was happening beforehand - due to Harry's unavailability later this year.
Yet the Sun now has the exclusive of him and Meghan's Sept calendar.

I get it, it sells.
I see it as simply the pattern of so-called never ending exclusives who correctly see how this royal drama continues to sell and they will mine for eternity.
But there are only so many tales of zoom meeting, alleged phone calls, supposed face time, returns that will keep 'reuniting the brothers', till the trope is played out.
So yeah I have my doubts on the truth level here.

I notice The Sun report is careful to say Harry may return in Sept, giving them an out.
It's a win for them.
Now the statue unveiling passed without event, there can still be more will they/won't they royal 'exclusives' to eke out till the Autumn.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 07-04-2021, 03:52 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,476
Its possible that Harry will return.. if travel is simpler I think that they may want to have a bigger ceremony than was possilbe on 1 July.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 07-04-2021, 04:13 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 11,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC21091968 View Post
The Telegraph has released two opinion piece on the Diana statue. One of them was very scathing and most criticises contemporary public art. The second article is less so with some credits given to Ian Rank-Broadley.

The Diana statue proves it – Britain’s public art is at an atrocious low
Banal, naff, Diana’s dignity eclipsed by narcissistic sentiment – this statue is everything that’s wrong with British public art today
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/arch...atrocious-low/
Archived link: https://archive.ph/4VGFE

Kitsch and archaic, the Princess Diana statue is a people-pleasing dud
Ian Rank-Broadley's effigy of the late Princess of Wales is neither great art nor a good likeness. But for die-hard fans, it will suffice
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/what...-pleasing-dud/
Archived link: https://archive.ph/Ox5Ti

The Times gave the Diana's statue 2 out of 5 stars, where the commentary is not exactly highly complimentary either

Princess Diana statue review: Laura Ashley monument is little better than the usual tat
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/l...ates-pdw867mgs
Archived link: https://archive.ph/OASf8
And all this from the Torygraph and the royalist Times, which speaks volumes on how lukewarm this statue is received.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 07-04-2021, 04:30 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,476
Its not all that surprising... Most modern art is terrible.. and Diana's beauty was not IMO suited to a statue....
ANd it took ages for the statue to be done...
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 07-04-2021, 09:12 AM
Royalist.in.NC's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Nowheresville, United States
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC21091968 View Post
The Telegraph has released two opinion piece on the Diana statue. One of them was very scathing and most criticises contemporary public art. The second article is less so with some credits given to Ian Rank-Broadley.

The Diana statue proves it – Britain’s public art is at an atrocious low
Banal, naff, Diana’s dignity eclipsed by narcissistic sentiment – this statue is everything that’s wrong with British public art today
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/arch...atrocious-low/
Archived link: https://archive.ph/4VGFE

Kitsch and archaic, the Princess Diana statue is a people-pleasing dud
Ian Rank-Broadley's effigy of the late Princess of Wales is neither great art nor a good likeness. But for die-hard fans, it will suffice
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/what...-pleasing-dud/
Archived link: https://archive.ph/Ox5Ti

The Times gave the Diana's statue 2 out of 5 stars, where the commentary is not exactly highly complimentary either

Princess Diana statue review: Laura Ashley monument is little better than the usual tat
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/l...ates-pdw867mgs
Archived link: https://archive.ph/OASf8
Thank you so very much for posting these articles from reputable sources as well as the archives so that those of us without subscriptions can read them!
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 07-04-2021, 10:08 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 11,195
These three anonymous random chosen children seem to depict Diana's charitable work. But children are quintessentially the core of all charities traditionally expected of any royal lady. It is not specifically Diana. Or they must think about her activities in a Kindergarten before her engagement, but then this clashes with the chosen clothes and hairstyle which were at the end of her life.

By hindsight, a spectacular new lush green park, named after Diana, giving Londoners new opportunities in that overcrowded metropole was a better choice.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 07-05-2021, 02:16 AM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 7,627
Meaning behind Three children in the Princess Diana statue
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 07-05-2021, 02:35 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 910
I love the garden. The people who designed and planted it are very talented.
The statue appears in a perfect setting.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 07-05-2021, 04:12 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Queens Village,, United States
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair View Post
These three anonymous random chosen children seem to depict Diana's charitable work. But children are quintessentially the core of all charities traditionally expected of any royal lady. It is not specifically Diana. Or they must think about her activities in a Kindergarten before her engagement, but then this clashes with the chosen clothes and hairstyle which were at the end of her life.

By hindsight, a spectacular new lush green park, named after Diana, giving Londoners new opportunities in that overcrowded metropole was a better choice.
I don't think they would use images of Lady Diana with those kindergarten children, this was the time she had just become known to the public. Diana had so many charity interests it would have been difficult to capture them all in one statue (unless they just included just Diana instead of children around her). I doubt they would use images of her work on the Land Mine Campaign, after the divorce. The statue is not perfect but I think Diana should have one dedicated to her.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 07-12-2021, 11:07 PM
EllieCat's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 551
I think the chap who did the recent statue of the Bee Gees on the Isle of Man captured the likeness of them much better than the chap who did Princess Diana, which I felt didn't really get to the core of her at all.
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 07-13-2021, 01:13 AM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 865
I like the spirit of the statue. Diana surrounded by children is a proper representation.

The contemporary clothing may seem jarring, as most statues we see feature nude bodies or clothing from bygone eras. However, I'll get used to it.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 07-28-2021, 11:18 PM
Elan's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sheridan, United States
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leopoldine View Post
I like the spirit of the statue. Diana surrounded by children is a proper representation.

The contemporary clothing may seem jarring, as most statues we see feature nude bodies or clothing from bygone eras. However, I'll get used to it.

Interesting point..well demonstrated by cemetery statues of a few hundred years ago.

https://pinterest.com/pin/58124651414043992/
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Princess Louise of Wales and Alexander Duff, 1st Duke of Fife - 1889 CyrilVladisla Historical Royal Weddings 1 09-06-2018 09:42 PM
Diana and Dodi Statue Unveiled; D&D dolls for sale on eBay (2005) iowabelle Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 143 04-15-2018 08:41 AM
Prince George's 1st Birthday: July 22, 2014 Warren The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 97 10-02-2014 02:12 PM
"Diana" (2013) - Film about Diana, Princess of Wales and Hasnat Khan Mermaid1962 The Electronic Domain 121 11-01-2013 09:54 PM




Popular Tags
american archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian baby names british british royal family buckingham palace camilla's family camilla parker bowles carolin china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing clarence house crown jewels daisy doge of venice dresses duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii family life family tree genetics gradenigo gustaf vi adolf harry and meghan hello! highgrove history hochberg hypothetical monarchs jack brooksbank japan japan history jewellery kensington palace king edward vii king juan carlos książ castle liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor list of rulers meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists monarchy names plantinum jubilee pless politics portugal prince harry queen consort queen elizabeth ii queen victoria royal ancestry royalty of taiwan solomon j solomon spanish royal family st edward sussex suthida swedish queen taiwan thai royal family unfinished portrait united states united states of america welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×