 |
|
07-02-2006, 11:37 PM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Charleston, SC, United States
Posts: 338
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by enbee
actually, james hewitt met diana in 1981.so.....
i check the picsof harry and james,i found that (although i do not want that is true)form the physical appearance, harry really looks like him.
|
No, James Hewitt claims to have met Diana in 1981. But, earlier, he agreed with her remembrance that he met her in 1985/86. He changes his story as he sees fit. If they did meet in 1981, it was likely so superficial a meeting that Diana had no recall of it, and it surely doesn't mean that their affair began before 1985/86. Whatever the case, it is 99.9% certain that he is not Harry's biological father. The press should be ashamed of themselves (not that they ever are) for cooking that one up-it's merely a slur against a dead woman and her son.
The man is just sleazy. Probably wants everyone to think the affair began earlier, so he can continue to fuel the rumor that he is Harry's biological father and keep himself in the public eye.
__________________
|
06-05-2007, 08:07 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,902
|
|
|
Claims about James Hewitt and Prince Harry's paternity
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skydragon
Question lingers 'After Diana': Who is Prince Harry's dad?
As the 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death approaches, a new book takes another look at a long-dismissed claim that Prince Harry's father was actually Diana's lover, James Hewitt.
|
This is really ridiculous, have they seen Prince Harry's recent picture? His resemblance to his father is really striking. If they alleged Prince Harry is Hewitt's son, I'm going to start thinking of the possibility only if they prove Hewitt is in turn Prince Philip's love child, because Prince Harry does resemble his father and grandfather quite a lot. 
__________________
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen!
|
06-05-2007, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Avalon
This is really ridiculous, have they seen Prince Harry's recent picture? His resemblance to his father is really striking.
|
I have to disagree with you Avalon, if you put pictures of Charles, Harry and James side by side, the resemblance to James is startling.  However it is immaterial who his biological father was, he is Charles' son.
|
06-05-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skydragon
I have to disagree with you Avalon, if you put pictures of Charles, Harry and James side by side, the resemblance to James is startling. However it is immaterial who his biological father was, he is Charles' son. |
I guess I'm disagreeing right back; I remember seeing a photo of Harry in camouflage and I really thought it was Charles for a moment. And there are other photos where he strongly resembles Prince Philip. The major resemblance to James Hewitt, IMO, is his colouring, which he also shares with his Spencer ancestors. To me, Diana looks a lot more like Jemima Goldsmith than Harry looks like James Hewitt.
|
06-05-2007, 07:44 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,377
|
|
Well I always thought Harry looked like his uncle Earl Spencer but that doesn't prove things one way or another with Harry's paternity.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
|
06-06-2007, 05:29 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Elspeth
I guess I'm disagreeing right back; I remember seeing a photo of Harry in camouflage and I really thought it was Charles for a moment. And there are other photos where he strongly resembles Prince Philip. The major resemblance to James Hewitt, IMO, is his colouring, which he also shares with his Spencer ancestors. To me, Diana looks a lot more like Jemima Goldsmith than Harry looks like James Hewitt
|
Having seen them in the flesh (so to speak), I hold with the view that Harry looks more like Hewitt, but then I also think Diana looks more like a Goldsmith!
|
06-06-2007, 06:53 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
|
I'm almost convinced that Charles is the father of Harry but one thing still makes me doubt : why didn't the royal family make the parternity test public ?
It wouldn't cost a penny and would stop the rumors !
|
06-06-2007, 07:12 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
I'm almost convinced that Charles is the father of Harry but one thing still makes me doubt : why didn't the royal family make the parternity test public ?
It wouldn't cost a penny and would stop the rumors !
|
Perhaps because it didn't show a result they wanted the public to know about! 
|
06-06-2007, 07:31 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,527
|
|
yes but seriously a paternity test would be an insult to Diana (whether one has been done or not it should never be acknowledged)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skydragon
Perhaps because it didn't show a result they wanted the public to know about! |
|
06-06-2007, 07:36 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
|
Maybe an insult but it would finally stop those people spreading rumors.
|
06-06-2007, 07:40 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,527
|
|
people who spread malecious rumours are not important
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
Maybe an insult but it would finally stop those people spreading rumors.
|
|
06-06-2007, 07:50 AM
|
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Charleston, SC, United States
Posts: 338
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
I'm almost convinced that Charles is the father of Harry but one thing still makes me doubt : why didn't the royal family make the parternity test public ?
It wouldn't cost a penny and would stop the rumors !
|
What paternity test? There's never been any indication that one was even conducted. For that matter, WHY should the Royal Family reveal any results publicly? Simply because the press decided to doubt Harry's paternity?
Charles is Harry's father-he has been from the day Harry was born. Legally, emotionally, and, in all likelihood, biologically. A paternity test wouldn't change that, and, for once, I applaud Charles for his refusal to give credence to the rumor by paying it any attention at all.
|
06-06-2007, 07:53 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
|
It wouldn't really matter what they did. Even if there was to be a ten-year enquiry into Harry's paternity, there would still be those who'd claim "coverup!" or "conspiracy!"
Unless the Royal Family intend to establish a precedent where every royal paternity is publicly examined, why would they do it for Harry (and his late mother)? As far as they are concerned, Harry is Charles' son; we can believe whatever we want to believe.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|
06-06-2007, 08:16 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sassie
What paternity test? There's never been any indication that one was even conducted. For that matter, WHY should the Royal Family reveal any results publicly? Simply because the press decided to doubt Harry's paternity?
Charles is Harry's father-he has been from the day Harry was born. Legally, emotionally, and, in all likelihood, biologically. A paternity test wouldn't change that, and, for once, I applaud Charles for his refusal to give credence to the rumor by paying it any attention at all.
|
Me, too. The fact that people talk about somebody (and people talk about anybody) can't lead to the fact that from now on anybody has to wash his family's linen in public! The idea of privacy is not there because people want it but because they need it.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
|
06-06-2007, 08:28 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
|
Even if Charles isn't the biological father of Harry, he is undoubtably the one who raised him. Hewitt, who claims to be his father, never tried to see him or anything. He's not a father to me ...
|
06-06-2007, 08:35 AM
|
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
Even if Charles isn't the biological father of Harry, he is undoubtably the one who raised him. Hewitt, who claims to be his father, never tried to see him or anything. He's not a father to me ...
|
As I said umpteen posts back and in the other threads where this has been discussed.... No matter who donated the sperm, Charles is Harrys father and has been since the moment the child was born!
|
06-06-2007, 08:42 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
Even if Charles isn't the biological father of Harry, he is undoubtably the one who raised him. Hewitt, who claims to be his father, never tried to see him or anything. He's not a father to me ...
|
When did Hewitt claim to be Harry's father? I've never read anyhing like that. on the contrary, Everthing I've read suggests that they started their relationship when Harry was a toddler. Did I miss a news flash?
|
06-06-2007, 08:43 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skydragon
As I said umpteen posts back and in the other threads where this has been discussed.... No matter who donated the sperm, Charles is Harrys father and has been since the moment the child was born!
|
Absolutely true ! Who was there when Diana died : Charles not Hewitt
|
06-06-2007, 08:54 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,527
|
|
well he would not have been allowed near the body even if he wanted to be there.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth
Absolutely true ! Who was there when Diana died : Charles not Hewitt
|
|
06-06-2007, 09:01 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Between the first and second floor of the Eiffel Tower, France
Posts: 2,651
|
|
|
No but he could have taken care of Harry which he didn't do. I don't think Hewitt offered confort to Harry after the loss of his mother.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
