 |
|

05-27-2021, 11:37 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Nowheresville, United States
Posts: 577
|
|
My C section almost 33 years ago was scheduled for the convenience of my doctor. He was going on vacation so if I wanted him as opposed to a colleague I had to have the section before he left. So I had to choose between having my eldest on 8-8-88 which we thought would be special ( of course I didn’t know that would be Beatrice’s birthday) or before the doctor left. So I chose the doctor and she was born on 8-5-88 
|

05-27-2021, 11:57 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,406
|
|
Archie wasn’t born as the result of a C-section in 2019, so as far as we know it was a natural birth. And so the Sussexes baby daughter is probably going to be the same.
|

05-28-2021, 02:09 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Silicon Valley, United States
Posts: 877
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frelinghighness
Not true. William was a scheduled c for Charles convenience, that was done quite a bit until recently
|
William's birth was INDUCED as a convenience, but it was an otherwise natural birth, not a c-section. Eugenie was a c-section as she was breech, and Louise due to emergency (placental abruption).
|

05-28-2021, 02:28 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,865
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraS3514
William's birth was INDUCED as a convenience, but it was an otherwise natural birth, not a c-section.
|
Do we know this as a matter of record or is it just speculation?
|

05-28-2021, 03:09 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frelinghighness
Not true. William was a scheduled c for Charles convenience, that was done quite a bit until recently
|
Not true.
https://www.theguardian.com/theguard...-william-birth
Diane gave birth after a 13 hour labour. She went home the day afterwards - unlikely if she had a caesarean even with a regiment of staff to care for her.
Diana might have said many things as her marriage crumbled and in the aftermath of her divorce - that doesn’t make them true.
|

05-28-2021, 03:10 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tintenbar, Australia
Posts: 4,133
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by muriel
Do we know this as a matter of record or is it just speculation?
|
It seems that Diana told Morton about the birth, and it was induced, at Diana's request. I don't have his first book so can't check, but "People" quoted from it in an article a few years ago. 'When his mother Princess Diana gave birth to him on June 21, 1982, Prince William “had to be induced, because I couldn’t handle the press pressure any longer, it was becoming unbearable,” Diana later told her confidant, journalist Andrew Morton.' The article goes on to quote her further and it wasn't a Caesarean, although "they" seem to have wanted her to have one.
https://people.com/parents/royal-bir...rincess-diana/
__________________
"That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, -- and call off Christmas!!!"
|

05-28-2021, 03:25 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,477
|
|
None of that sounds very likely. Why would they have wanted a healthy young woman to have a Caesarean unless it was medically necessary? The birth may well have been induced if she was a couple of weeks past her due date, which happens a lot, but it seems unlikely that it was because of the "press pressure". She wouldn't have been going out in public much by that stage anyway.
|

05-28-2021, 03:27 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alison H
None of that sounds very likely. Why would they have wanted a healthy young woman to have a Caesarean unless it was medically necessary? The birth may well have been induced if she was a couple of weeks past her due date, which happens a lot, but it seems unlikely that it was because of the "press pressure". She wouldn't have been going out in public much by that stage anyway.
|
She didn't have a Caesarean. She says that the birth was induced, and did say at some stage that it was to suit Charles' timetable.. but its possible/probable that it was for medical reasons....that she was a bit past her due date.
Diana did say a lot of things about Charles to make him seem bad, so I wouldn't take it seriously....
Anyway I suppose Meg and Harry will announce thier baby's birth on social media when it suits them
|

05-28-2021, 04:55 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,865
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn
It seems that Diana told Morton about the birth, and it was induced, at Diana's request. I don't have his first book so can't check, but "People" quoted from it in an article a few years ago. 'When his mother Princess Diana gave birth to him on June 21, 1982, Prince William “had to be induced, because I couldn’t handle the press pressure any longer, it was becoming unbearable,” Diana later told her confidant, journalist Andrew Morton.' The article goes on to quote her further and it wasn't a Caesarean, although "they" seem to have wanted her to have one.
https://people.com/parents/royal-bir...rincess-diana/
|
Thank you!
|

05-28-2021, 04:56 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,865
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Diana did say a lot of things about Charles to make him seem bad, so I wouldn't take it seriously....
|
Fair point!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
She says that the birth was induced, and did say at some stage that it was to suit Charles' timetable.. but its possible/probable that it was for medical reasons....that she was a bit past her due date.
|
Its not uncommon for first pregnancies to go on past the due date, and inducing labour is not uncommon here in the UK.
|

05-28-2021, 07:29 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Archie was about week late. Baby Girl Sussex will come when she is ready.
|

05-28-2021, 08:11 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 786
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Archie was about week late. Baby Girl Sussex will come when she is ready.
|
That's true too, babies come when they're ready.
|

05-31-2021, 10:42 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 3,080
|
|
Soon she'll be a June baby (which I think is the due date). But they did say summer, and summer only starts at the end of the month, so the baby could be a July baby.
__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
|

05-31-2021, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 8,987
|
|
American school break for the summer typically start late May/early June (returning to school by Mid-August), so all of June would fall in the American definition of 'summer'.
|

05-31-2021, 11:04 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 3,080
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
American school break for the summer typically start late May/early June (returning to school by Mid-August), so all of June would fall in the American definition of 'summer'.
|
Oh I see. I had no idea
__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
|

05-31-2021, 11:08 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,791
|
|
It is possible that the baby is about to be born. The baby is due in June.
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
|

05-31-2021, 11:15 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
American school break for the summer typically start late May/early June (returning to school by Mid-August), so all of June would fall in the American definition of 'summer'.
|
This is true. Most schools will be out for summer in the next week or so, if they not already out.
I am thinking she is a June baby as well but we shall see.
|

05-31-2021, 11:28 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blog Real
It is possible that the baby is about to be born. The baby is due in June.
|
Did they announce that?
|

05-31-2021, 11:31 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Did they announce that?
|
No. But it is my prediction.
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
|

05-31-2021, 11:33 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon, United States
Posts: 946
|
|
When Meghan was a girl, schools in California tended to end the 1st week of June (I should know, my brothers and I graduated from a CA HS in the early 1990s), and returned the last week of August. This has gradually shifted in the last 15-20 years, especially with the emergence of year-round school calendars, so that most finish the 3rd week of May (usually Memorial Day weekend is the 4th weekend of the month, this year is unusual with 5 weekends in May and Memorial Day being the last), and they return the 2nd week of August.
My guess, if we're going by the school definition of "summer" - we're looking at the 2nd week of June at the earliest for Baby Girl Sussex's arrival. Of course, babies have their own time schedule and she could put in an appearance before then.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|