 |
|

02-15-2021, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,938
|
|
I think early June is the most likely.
Most women will wait 6 weeks or so after a miscarriage, to safely try again. An early June baby would have her conceiving early September 2020, 2 months (or less) after her miscarriage. Its unlikely she is much further along then that.
|

02-15-2021, 09:36 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,412
|
|
I think from the photograph that Meghan is due in May as well, though after Archie's second birthday. However, I was wrong about Archie's arrival. From the way Meghan was carrying I thought for sure that it would be an April birth.
Thing is, some women hardly show through their pregnancy, some start getting a bulge at six/seven months and some pretty well start showing their bump at four to five months and really balloon out later.
I was like that (Ive had three) and Meghan is as well. Her bump at five months was quite prominent with Archie as it is in this latest photo. So she could well only be four to five months along now. I'll say a May birth but wouldn't be surprised at a June arrival.
|

02-16-2021, 04:15 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,788
|
|
A number of these guessestimates are based on the photograph showing the bump, do we actually know when it was taken.
|

02-16-2021, 06:56 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout
I think early June is the most likely.
Most women will wait 6 weeks or so after a miscarriage, to safely try again. An early June baby would have her conceiving early September 2020, 2 months (or less) after her miscarriage. Its unlikely she is much further along then that.
|
Then add in the request for the trial delay in October. Likely not long after they discovered she was pregnant...
|

02-16-2021, 07:05 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
I am going with June between the miscarriage and the picture I think May too soon.
|

02-16-2021, 09:14 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,412
|
|
[...]
The photo of Harry and Meghan was a beautiful one which showed the love between them and their baby to come IMO.
|

02-16-2021, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 3,081
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout
I think early June is the most likely.
Most women will wait 6 weeks or so after a miscarriage, to safely try again. An early June baby would have her conceiving early September 2020, 2 months (or less) after her miscarriage. Its unlikely she is much further along then that.
|
That makes sense. Moreover, Meghan tends to show early because of her body structure (short waist), so I'll change my guesses and say a June baby (maybe early June?).
__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
|

02-16-2021, 08:57 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 6,245
|
|
Posts about Thomas Markle and comments about the Daily Mail lawsuit have been deleted.
|

02-16-2021, 10:03 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,917
|
|
Here's the original Instagram post by photographer Misan Harriman. His posted sentiments are interesting: https://www.instagram.com/p/CLSL_aqARfv/
Also, the below article in Vogue describes an interview Harriman had with British Vogue that went into more detail regarding the significance of and setting for the M&H pregnancy announcement photo shoot:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/...?ocid=msedgntp
British Vogue article:
https://www.vogue.co.uk/news/article...an-second-baby
In prepping for the photo shoot, Harriman says, "... they didn’t need any direction, because they are, and always have been, waltzing through life together as absolute soulmates. When you see people who have the connection that they have, it's like reading the pages of a book..."
ET Canada discusses the pregnancy news, including a clip of Misan Harriman on GMA, interviewed by Robin Roberts:
https://youtu.be/95DivufEJc4
|

02-18-2021, 05:50 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,402
|
|
Isn't it amazing how technology is allowing some semblance of ordinary life, from distance learning, zoom dating and now a beautiful photograph attributed to the voice organising and remote handling of an iPad.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

02-18-2021, 06:47 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,483
|
|
Meghan was showing very early with Archie, which was partly why they made the announcement before the Australia tour. It seems unlikely that she'd have conceived again within a couple of months of her miscarriage, so June or even July seems more likely than May.
|

03-26-2021, 07:18 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: tacoma, United States
Posts: 637
|
|
Does anyone know the month when the little girl should arrive? She is already pretty big, to look at the last picture in their garden.
|

03-26-2021, 07:31 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,412
|
|
Meghan replied, when Oprah asked the date, ‘In the summer’. So I would guess June, though May just might be a possibility. She looked pretty far along in the photo.
|

05-27-2021, 04:56 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Essex, United Kingdom
Posts: 124
|
|
Why do I think that when baby girl Sussex arrives, we’ll be the last to know?
|

05-27-2021, 04:58 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 4,598
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaye1850
Why do I think that when baby girl Sussex arrives, we’ll be the last to know?
|
Because they'll probably time the announcement of the birth to coincide with the US TV morning shows.
|

05-27-2021, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 56
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR76
Because they'll probably time the announcement of the birth to coincide with the US TV morning shows.
|
They'll do it on Diana's b-day or prince William's. 
|

05-27-2021, 07:11 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,412
|
|
Babies are born when they are born, they don’t plan it. The Queen’s own father was born on the anniversary of the death of Prince Albert, and everybody worried that it would upset his grandmother, Queen Victoria. So if the Sussexes baby daughter is born on Diana’s birthday or on William’s birthday, so be it.
Harry came out to the Royal Stables at Windsor within hours of Archie being born and spoke to the media about the birth. As the baby girl will almost certainly be born in a LA or Santa Barbara hospital, the chances of anybody keeping quiet for days about that would be zero. The announcement will come within hours IMO like any other royal birth.
|

05-27-2021, 08:21 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
LA is 8 hours behind London. It really won't matter when it is announced because it will be LA time regardless.
|

05-27-2021, 09:05 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
A newborn child coming into a family is a joyous and happy occasion and with the Sussex daughter, her birth will be a happy occasion they'll share with the world when they feel it appropriate. I'm not going to read anything else into this birth than that it is and will be a very happy occasion.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-27-2021, 10:54 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England, United States
Posts: 6,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong
Babies are born when they are born, they don’t plan it. The Queen’s own father was born on the anniversary of the death of Prince Albert, and everybody worried that it would upset his grandmother, Queen Victoria. So if the Sussexes baby daughter is born on Diana’s birthday or on William’s birthday, so be it.
Harry came out to the Royal Stables at Windsor within hours of Archie being born and spoke to the media about the birth. As the baby girl will almost certainly be born in a LA or Santa Barbara hospital, the chances of anybody keeping quiet for days about that would be zero. The announcement will come within hours IMO like any other royal birth.
|
Not true. William was a scheduled c for Charles convenience, that was done quite a bit until recently
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|