 |
|

01-18-2020, 04:29 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: City of Light, France
Posts: 273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsypaige
This. Honestly, I only care about them now as it relates to Harry returning home and seeing family. I’m sure they’ll pop up on ET and other entertainment programs, but I won’t be interested.
I’ll be honest, unless H and M come to NYC, I don’t see any NY papers covering them. Even then, I don’t think it will be a big deal. Same for other cities. The U.S. is huge, and we’ve got our own issues to deal with, heaven knows. The only media who will be covering them regularly will be entertainment media, unlike in the UK, where they were real news. So, I wonder just how disappointed they’ll be when they see how NOT a big deal they are here
|
 This is both an Olympics year and an election year for the US. Good luck getting basic news to cover you past Memorial Day. I'm sure entertainment news will include them but as the novelty wears off that will trickle off as well. If I were Meghan I'd be bracing for the inevitable VF article---they launched her so you know they will run a follow up covering "what went wrong". Ouch.
|

01-18-2020, 04:29 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsarinya
But without the HRH’s aren’t they lower ranking to Bea and Eug who are HRH Princesses?
|
They are still HRH. They aren't using it. I've seen it said they will use the HRH IF they do engagements for the Queen.
LaRae
|

01-18-2020, 04:30 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Some RR's are saying (they have been asking BP questions) they will still do engagements for the Queen AND they are expected to be at the Trooping etc.
Now it remains to be seen how that all plays out.
LaRae
|
I think they are home on a Saturday. Flying by the seat. The statement said they would not be representing the crown.
|

01-18-2020, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,784
|
|
CNN is blasting this now. It's planning a special Harry and Meghan Royal Revolution for tonighr, 9 pm EST.
|

01-18-2020, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chambery, France
Posts: 302
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsarinya
But without the HRH’s aren’t they lower ranking to Bea and Eug who are HRH Princesses?
|
They have the style! still, they agreed not to use it!
|

01-18-2020, 04:32 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
|
|
I think it would be clearer that they will be Mr Mountbatten Windsor and Mrs Markle.
I suppose the next step will be, them giving up the style
|

01-18-2020, 04:32 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,391
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Some RR's are saying (they have been asking BP questions) they will still do engagements for the Queen AND they are expected to be at the Trooping etc.
Now it remains to be seen how that all plays out.
LaRae
|
Chris Ship has asked about engagements and it’s been confirmed that they will do engagements soon. When asked if it would be Henry and Meghan, he wasn’t given a clear answer.
Trooping is a family event, Henry never got a role to ride on horseback and he can still wear a uniform so I think he’ll be there.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

01-18-2020, 04:33 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,022
|
|
They wont use it in their new life.. but they will still Be HRH's...
|

01-18-2020, 04:35 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,060
|
|
I am surprised at the timing since it’s Saturday evening in the U.K. I think the decision was fair considering the position BRF was put in and the unpredictable and reckless actions Meghan and Harry have demonstrated. It’s unfortunate for everyone that it came to this. I hope Harry and Meghan are happy now.
|

01-18-2020, 04:35 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 2,969
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalNight
On their Instagram the Sussexes posted the Queen's statement, but not the Palace's. I'm embarassed for them
|
Figures. HM’s was very kind towards them. The Palace’s laid out the reality.
It is embarrassing, but they did it to themselves. This was completely avoidable. All they had to do was shut up until actual decisions were made.
I think going public- and going public with all that detail- was a negotiating tactic that failed on a spectacularly public level. They rolled the dice. It didn’t work. And it is quite embarrassing for them.
|

01-18-2020, 04:36 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy7
I think they are home on a Saturday. Flying by the seat. The statement said they would not be representing the crown.
|
Yes and they are shooting questions to BP and posting the replies. The reply to the question "Will there be further royal engagements in the UK for the Sussexes" was "Yes".
LaRae
|

01-18-2020, 04:36 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: The Secret Garden, United Kingdom
Posts: 36
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Some RR's are saying (they have been asking BP questions) they will still do engagements for the Queen AND they are expected to be at the Trooping etc.
Now it remains to be seen how that all plays out.
LaRae
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
They are still HRH. They aren't using it. I've seen it said they will use the HRH IF they do engagements for the Queen.
LaRae
|
Oh! In that case I don’t know why some people are so happy on social media and such because they haven’t been stripped of their HRHs they just can’t use them.
|

01-18-2020, 04:37 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,022
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsypaige
I don’t think it’s cause to celebrate. HM and Charles are suffering personally, and from a practical point of view, the BRF is experiencing a severe shortage of working royals. Archie is losing his extended family ..so is Harry (his father, brother, etc..), but that’s his choice
|
It is not really good, in that Charles IS losing a large portion of his workforce.. hope he has time to work things out and manage the work. I don't think thtat Meg will ever come back.. and yet I feel that Harry wont be that happy with his new life maybe and then there's the strain of a marriage being pulled 2 ways.
And Im sure it is very painful to Will and Charles to see Harry disappear like this.
|

01-18-2020, 04:38 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erin9
Figures. HM’s was very kind towards them. The Palace’s laid out the reality.
It is embarrassing, but they did it to themselves. This was completely avoidable. All they had to do was shut up until actual decisions were made.
I think going public- and going public with all that detail- was a negotiating tactic that failed on a spectacularly public level. They rolled the dice. It didn’t work. And it is quite embarrassing for them.
|
Not the first, won't be the last. Surrounded by yes men. A North American team who don't understand the monarchy. She doesn't understand the monarchy. He has endless charisma in public but is not academically bright. It was a misfire. Embarrassing.
|

01-18-2020, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,353
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Betsypaige
Your first paragraph tells me that Harry didn’t adequately prepare Meghan for life with the media, but more importantly it tells me that she’s too concerned with what the media says - Harry as well. She’s not the only one who has had nasty, vicious, and at times vulgar press coverage - Charles and Camilla are good examples, though lord knows not the only ones. If they’d paid any attention to the media - or cared about what was printed- they’d never have gotten in with their lives. If Charles had been debilitated by the press coverage during the Diana years, he’d have never been able to be the remarkable PoW he is. If Meghan expected to be publicly supported by the BRF, then she didn’t do her research, didn’t ask the right questions...and that’s on HER. I’m sure she was offered support in private, but I’m guessing she just didn’t recognize it..
|
I don't think it's just the media. I think it's comments by citizens online (on news articles, on this forum, on reddit, on instagram, etc). Sure, a person can learn to ignore all of this - but they do not have to ignore it. Meghan is in show business, she's entitled to retain some of her personality traits surely.
The stuff I'm reading shocks me. I've tried to ignore it (by not coming here much, for example or only lurking). But this "Thank god the evil Meghan is not part of MY family" stuff is really off putting and it wouldn't take my DH more than a few glimpses for him to want it to stop (on my behalf). It's not going to stop, of course, but at least now the British public doesn't have the same "rights" to criticize Harry and Meghan and they can definitely avoid British tabloid press way more than in the past. Just living in Canada has got to help with that.
BTW, I do believe the Canadians have earned their reputation for politeness.
|

01-18-2020, 04:39 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,022
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Yes and they are shooting questions to BP and posting the replies. The reply to the question "Will there be further royal engagements in the UK for the Sussexes" was "Yes".
LaRae
|
Probably a few, as hey are retaining a few patronages. But when they settle down to new life, is it going to work out that they come back now and again?
|

01-18-2020, 04:39 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,117
|
|
Well finally we know the future for the couple. They will in effect be private people, while still being "celebrities".
I think the palace have been looking at the polling of public thoughts and have in many ways met the public expectations:
*repaying the cost of Frogmore and now paying rent on it
*no use of HRH styles but with the option to use them if required and without them being "stripped" of them as Diana was (the perception of wihc the Palace wanted to avoid)
*no public funding (Although the use of Duchy funds has not being commented upon - I suspect thats because its a-not yet decided what will happen with it and b-its seen as Charles private income so we will have to see how the PoW annual report lays it out in May/June time)
*security - well they were never going to comment upon it but given Andrew is said to be loosing some if not all of his police protection I suspect over time the use of "official protection" will be diminished
This is IMO the best solution (though I would add the caveat that they should also not use "SussexRoyal" and use "Sussex" or something else entirely) for all. It makes clear they have not been stripped of royal status, are still members of the royal family in the sense of being part of the sovereign's family, but are expected not to use royal status in this new venture.
As for timing - this fits within the Queen's supposed desire to see it settled "within days" and also, remember most people in the UK read newspapers at the weekend and many Sunday editions are effectively separate publications with their own staff which would cover this story whenever it came - much better to get it done now so the papers can go mad for it over the weekend and into next week with the hope that by this time next week there will be a new focus for the media and the monarchy can in effect move on.
I suspect there are, as was reported, a few sticking issues, a lot of reporters saying the statement was less than they expected in terms of detail, so I bet those undecided issues will be sorted later but to met HM's demand on timing and to get over the headlines BP decided they had enough to show what direction they were taking so announce and add clarity as needed later.
|

01-18-2020, 04:40 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsarinya
Oh! In that case I don’t know why some people are so happy on social media and such because they haven’t been stripped of their HRHs they just can’t use them.
|
A lot of ppl have no idea how it really works ..and that includes the media who often post incorrect info when it comes to titles etc.
LaRae
|

01-18-2020, 04:40 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
Yes and they are shooting questions to BP and posting the replies. The reply to the question "Will there be further royal engagements in the UK for the Sussexes" was "Yes".
LaRae
|
I saw family events. Like trooping of the colour. Not engagments.
|

01-18-2020, 04:42 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 1,046
|
|
This seems like a good solution all around. I'm happy for Harry and Meghan.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|