 |
|

03-03-2023, 02:18 AM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 63
|
|
I would love to have a peek at it too!
|

03-03-2023, 04:17 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 6,211
|
|
A number of posts have been deleted. It appears people aren’t reading the mod notes. As was stated earlier, this thread is about the Sussexes. If you wish to discuss the living situation for Andrew, Anne, William and other members of the BRF, you can do so in their respective threads. Further off-topic comments will be deleted.
|

03-03-2023, 04:52 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,700
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong
Yes, I know all about the history of Frogmore Cottage. What I wrote was that it had (internally) been made into four or five staff dwellings at one stage. Junior chefs and others lived there. And that stage was for several years before it was decided it would do for Harry and Meghan in 2018. It was described at the time as ‘a bit run-down’ by a few of those who had lived there. It was hardly Anmer in other words, but was considered good enough for the Sussexes.
|
They chose Frogmore Cottage themselves.
Quote from Spare:
Quote:
... we'd been offered several properties, but each was too grand, we thought. Too lavish. And too expensive to renovate.
|
Given that the Sovereign Grant initially paid for the renovation of Frogmore Cottage, there's no reason to assume that the Sussexes, as working royals, would have been expected to pay the renovation costs of another property.
After they'd turned down other grander properties, "Granny" had a think and then suggested Frogmore Cottage. She said, "It's a bit of building site. Bit of a shell. But go and have a look and do tell me if it works."
So Harry and Meghan visited FC and then phoned "Granny" saying Frogmore Cottage "Would be a dream come true. I thanked her profusely".
|

03-03-2023, 04:59 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
|
|
Why did they not want something grand? I thought that H was complaining that his London house was too small and he bumped his head all the time
|

03-03-2023, 05:30 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London / Guildford, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,602
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Why did they not want something grand? I thought that H was complaining that his London house was too small and he bumped his head all the time
|
One of the many things we have learnt about Harry & meghan in the last few years is that they often contradict themselves.
|

03-03-2023, 05:51 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,294
|
|
Lets not consider Frogmore Cottage anything less than a grace a favour home (yes I know they paid the money back) a home that no one apart from BRF members or their staff have access to.) It was perfectly fine for family of 2-4 and doubtless more would have been on offer had they stayed. There have long been rumours that the Duchy bought a run down estate in Herefordshire for one of Charles's sons but neither wanted it. To me that would be a project to last a lifetime, but it if wasn't for them..
Lets not equate the Sussexes being asked to vacate (however it was done) with a family who have 6 weeks to find decent place near the kids schools or parents' work or tube station.
It's not even a beloved holiday home. They're being asked to vacate a property that in all honesty they have very little attachment to, probably have spent less than 2 months there in the last two years and will undoubtedly be put up in other family homes when they choose to visit.
The Chief Rabbi is being put up in Clarence house for the coronation because of Shabbat, do we think Charles would do les for his son (especially if in need?)
|

03-03-2023, 06:17 AM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 63
|
|
I personally think Charles would have very likely gone to considerable effort to ensure that Harry and his family would be offered secure and comfortable accommodation should they decide to go over for the coronation. Somewhere that offered the type of protection Harry believes he requires in the UK. That would also, naturally, be somewhere that photographers/film crew would not be allowed, which would ensure a level of privacy valued by the other family members.
|

03-03-2023, 06:50 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,953
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Why did they not want something grand? I thought that H was complaining that his London house was too small and he bumped his head all the time
|
Well considering all the hell they got for living in the “modest” Frogmore Cottage, just imagine if they lived anywhere else. Many barely thought Meghan deserved to live in Nottingham Cottage.. So I get the hesitation.
|

03-03-2023, 07:00 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Well considering all the hell they got for living in the “modest” Frogmore Cottage, just imagine if they lived anywhere else. Many barely thought Meghan deserved to live in Nottingham Cottage.. So I get the hesitation.
|
Im afraid I must have missed all this.
|

03-03-2023, 07:09 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Im afraid I must have missed all this.
|
You missed the fuss about how much FC was ‘costing the taxpayer’, that was the tune the tabloids played for months, though they knew it was paid for by Sovereign Grant moneys? You missed the lies the media made up practically every day for months about the interiors, about moving yoga floors, a yoga studio and luxurious baths etc as if the Cottage was a new Versailles?
|

03-03-2023, 07:22 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
|
|
must have done. I didn't know that Harry was so bothered that he would pick a smaller less fancy house because he was getting flak from the papers
|

03-03-2023, 07:32 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,953
|
|
So Meghan wouldn’t be attacked for daring to live in a home? Of course he would. Not that she wasn’t anyways.
|

03-03-2023, 07:34 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Well considering all the hell they got for living in the “modest” Frogmore Cottage, just imagine if they lived anywhere else. Many barely thought Meghan deserved to live in Nottingham Cottage.. So I get the hesitation.
|
So the reason they had the cottage was because THEY picked Frogmore as it was smaller and they were reluctant to attract negative publicity for picking a larger home.
|

03-03-2023, 07:41 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Harry and Meghan certainly knew that the tabloids would have been merciless over all the renovations needed to the apartment next door to the Cambridges at KP, which was then lived in by the Gloucesters and supposedly to be offered to them in due course. That apartment needed over three million pounds in renovations. The tabloids would have had a field day.
They had already stated that half a million pounds had been paid at FC for soundproofing, that a tennis court was going to be laid down, a complete new wing was going to be built, that a 5 thousand pounds copper bath had been installed. All complete lies, along with one tabloid saying that the Sussexes were preventing a staff car park from operating near their gardens. Another untruth. God knows what would have happened if they had chosen the KP apartment.
|

03-03-2023, 07:43 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: West Chester, United States
Posts: 308
|
|
From accounts I have read, AND Harry's own words, The Sussex's "had been offered several properties, but each were to lavish or grand", so there you have it, The Sussex's were given top of the line accommodation, but they chose something smaller, Frogmore Cottage.
Speaking of which, it was totally gutted and refitted. Totally.
The 4 or 5 apartments inside were eliminated to reconfigure it back to single family home. Outfitted with EVERYTHING NEW. That the Sussex's picked out. They even had new top grade insulation installed to diminish noise as they were under the flight path to Heathrow.
Lets not pretend that this was some run down property with substandard ancient plumbing, creaky repurposed appliances and furnishings. Not pokey little rooms from the turn of the century. Everything blasted open, reconfigured, and top shelf ......eco friendly too.
In retrospect it makes perfect sense. From what most of us surmise, The Sussex's knew from soon after the Wedding that they wanted The UK to be a part time residence, with the HI-H0 Plan being formulated. It was never going to be a forever fulltime home and they knew it. Frogmore Cottage suited their needs perfectly, not to ostentatious, to fit the "progressive modern" image they *hoped* they were going to project to The World.
The "optics" of a non palatial Frogmore Cottage as opposed to a grand "apartment" in Kensington Palace or an Estate like Edward's Bagshot Park was very smart on the Sussex's part for their PR strategy, with both The Queen in mind and the Public, but it all went awry.
Thanks to the posters who showed the pictures of Frogmore Cottage. Especially the aerial ones and the one from the back. That show how sprawling the house and property is. Had The Sussex's stayed there I imagine that lovely gardens and possibly a gorgeous pool area would have been added and the ground around the house done up gorgeous.
We have to keep in mind that the Sussex's moved into Frogmore in April 2019. They LEFT for Canada in Nov 2019, Never to return to live as Residents.
A mere 7 months.
The timeline always amazes me of their unbelievably short tenure. But wow, they sure stockpiled a ton of supposed grievances and slights in that short time.
|

03-03-2023, 07:48 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
So Meghan wouldn’t be attacked for daring to live in a home? Of course he would. Not that she wasn’t anyways.
|
What attacks? You mean she got criticised in the Press?
|

03-03-2023, 07:51 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,700
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Well considering all the hell they got for living in the “modest” Frogmore Cottage, just imagine if they lived anywhere else. Many barely thought Meghan deserved to live in Nottingham Cottage.. So I get the hesitation.
|
I've always said that Meghan had appalling press coverage from some outlets but I don't know if it could have been any worse if they'd had a grander home. Other senior royals were pilloried by some papers for what was spent on their properties. There's a saying that you "might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb" and whatever they'd settled on was going to be criticised so they could have chosen a grander place and ridden the storm as others had done before them.
We don't know why they didn't want something grander at the time but perhaps they preferred to have something smaller that they could manage without live-in staff?
|

03-03-2023, 07:53 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Frogmore is a four bedroom house with a nursery. It’s not a sprawling mansion.
The other properties like the KP apartment were considered ‘too lavish and grand’ because they knew what the British tabloids were capable of. I’ve already pointed to several of their complete lies about FC, and that was on top of constant criticisms of Meghan’s clothing, nail polish, speeches, hugging of people etc etc etc.
|

03-03-2023, 07:58 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,700
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong
Harry and Meghan certainly knew that the tabloids would have been merciless over all the renovations needed to the apartment next door to the Cambridges at KP, which was then lived in by the Gloucesters and supposedly to be offered to them in due course. That apartment needed over three million pounds in renovations. The tabloids would have had a field day.
They had already stated that half a million pounds had been paid at FC for soundproofing, that a tennis court was going to be laid down, a complete new wing was going to be built, that a 5 thousand pounds copper bath had been installed. All complete lies, along with one tabloid saying that the Sussexes were preventing a staff car park from operating near their gardens. Another untruth. God knows what would have happened if they had chosen the KP apartment.
|
The same thing would have happened whatever they chose: downright lies, rumours, half-truths, fantasy... Harry would have known that, because it had already happened recently to others in his family. He would have been well aware that no matter which property they chose, some of the press would be ridiculous in their critical stories.
|

03-03-2023, 07:59 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,707
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong
Frogmore is a four bedroom house with a nursery. It’s not a sprawling mansion.
The other properties like the KP apartment were considered ‘too lavish and grand’ because they knew what the British tabloids were capable of. I’ve already pointed to several of their complete lies about FC, and that was on top of constant criticisms of Meghan’s clothing, nail polish, speeches, hugging of people etc etc etc.
|
Some of the media were relentless with silly and probably hurtful stories that is quite true, and if that is why THEY picked Frogmore well fair enough rather than been given it with no other choice.
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|