The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family, News and Events 6: Aug. 2021- Oct. 2022

[muriel]

Originally Posted by Alison H

The podcast interviews could be very good if Meghan would stop trying to make everything about her. I don't know who else is lined up, but Serena Williams and Mariah Carey are very big names.

And why must Meghan lie all the time? Claiming that 40 photographers would have followed her children to school in the UK every day. Has that ever happened with George and Charlotte? The press aren't allowed to hassle children at school. It was just another blatant lie. And I should imagine that Prince Charles is very upset by her saying that Harry's "lost" his father.

The Mandela family aren't impressed by her claims that her wedding was somehow comparable to Nelson Mandela's release from prison.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...an-Markle.html

All very valid points @Alison H.

The truth of the matter is that, IMO, these podcasts and the media interviews by Meghan confirm a lot more of what a lot of people already thought of Meghan.

The irony is that Meghan is bright, perceptive, articulate, and could probably be a great interviewer and possibly, chat show host. Oprah Mark 2? But by the sounds of it, she is so driven by her own agendas, she doesn't seem to particularly care about what her guests have to say, and that can be quite offputting to both the interviewee, and the audience.

As has been said, better to be silent and be thought of a fool than to speak and remove all doubt!

[Alison H]

The New York Post carried the headline "Toddler and Tiara" with a picture of Meghan looking sulky, and described her as a "petulant princess", whilst Australian TV called her a t***er.

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/petulant-p...183750886.html

As you say, she could be a great interviewer if she didn't make everything about herself, especially if she's able to attract high calibre interviewees such as Serena and Mariah. But she does make everything about herself. And she lies.

[Nico]

Ah, the laugh ....

"Mandela grandson ‘surprised’ at Meghan wedding comparison" :

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ing-comparison

[muriel]

Originally Posted by Nico

Ah, the laugh ....

Mandela grandson ‘surprised’ at Meghan wedding comparison https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ing-comparison

I wonder if she even realises what a preposterous suggestion it was? I suspect any input from the team around her is probably disregarded.

[Mbruno]

Originally Posted by Claire

I have always wondered about the half in half out claim - and I think it is directed at all the senior royals. Charles has real estate and a organic farming business, Anne gets money from Gatcombe - shows and horse stock. Even the Queen earns money from her horses ect. So it is really how you view it.

There is no rule against any of the Royals having a private estate. Certainly not for Anne, or the Gloucesters, nor indeed for Charles or the Queen herself. Getting money from your estate or horse breeding is significantly different in my opinion from the "half-in, half-out" arrangement that Meghan had in mind. If the Sussexes wanted to live like Anne ten or twenty years from now, nobody would raise any objection.

And Anne is hardly "half out" considering she is one of the busiest members of the Family in number of annual engagements, isn't she?

Originally Posted by Granada

I honestly am flabbergasted that Megan keeps upping the ante in this War with Charles, Camilla, William and Kate. And by extension The Queen.

She and Harry are NOT going to let the fact that the "Half In--Half Out" proposal was vetoed, and the Sussex's grandiose plans of merging "Royalty-Public Service" with "Celebrity-Commercial Opportunities" got blown up and shot down.
It is quite clear that they are on a path to establish The Sussex's as an American based alternative to The UK Windsors, specifically William and Kate.
[...]

Make no mistake, that IS what She is doing. Setting herself and Harry up as "modern Royals". American branded.
With a emphasis on diversity and all things WOKE. An alternative to stuffy, old-fashioned AND out of touch, passe William and Kate.

If so, she's fighting an imaginary popularity war. The position of King and, by extension, that of the heir and the heir to the heir are constitutional roles defined by law. In theory, Charles and William don't need to be popular or "modern" to be King. To the extent that the UK and the Commonwealth realms are now democracies, they do have to care somewhat about popularity as there is always a (remote) possibility that the people might decide to "cancel" them (i.e. choose to abolish the monarchy), but they certainly don't have to be popular to make a living selling books, interviews, podcasts, or reality TV shows the way the Sussexes do, and definitely they don't need to be popular in America, a country in which they will never reign.

If anything, Meghan's antics have caused her popularity to plummet in the UK specifically. And I am not sure how she is doing either in the PR battle in the US, which is what she is most concerned about as it is what her livelihood depends on. She will always find a niche market for the type of stories she wants to tell about the Royal Family and "royal life", but honestly I can't see her doing that for 10 or 20 years (it's been 2 and a half years already) without becoming old news or plainly uninteresting. She can maybe reinvent herself as a philanthropist or a talk show/podcast host with access to many celebrity friends, but the US has lots of people like that and Meghan, without the royal label attached to her, hardly stands out.

The saddest part is Harry becoming alienated and estranged from his family and his country. I don't want to play the "Meghan blame game" as we know, to be fair, that Harry also had his personal issues and presumably wanted out regardless of his relationship with Meghan, but right now Harry looks merely like an accessory to Meghan's "California dream"

[Denville]

Royals who engaged in business as Anne etc does, have to stick with various rules and regulations. I understand that this was offered to H and Meghan but they were unwilling to have themselves tied down like that and I suppose they did not wnat (for example) to run a private estate. Anne's primary responsibility is working as a royal...

[Claire]

I am looking at this from a very distant view. Okay, remove Meghan from the scene - another presenter.
Looking at the Serena interview - even narrowing their interview to the topic of Ambition. They could have done a lot. Serena knows ambitions and she is not scared of it - she knocks it out of the park. The interview was not about Serena and considering that Serena is now retiring this could have been a great eye opening interview. It was dribble.
Interview with Mariah - absolutely no preparation. Meghan didn't read the book - she has absolutely no idea what is in that book. She could have had a bumper interview - she could have really driven how Mariah owns the Diva stereotype.
Now lets not hide behind the bush - a regular interviewer would kill for this platform and 2 bit interviewer would have made a better job of it. She wanted a platform, she has a platform - she is squandering the platform. This sounds familiar. It worries me that she is surrounded by people who is not helping. Everyone in the industry has told me the same - what are all those people doing? essentially this can be as technically polished as a gold bowl - if the content is dribble it is pointless. it is mind boggling that she is ill prepared for these interviews. She doesn't have any journalistic skill but surely someone should be assisting.

[Claire]

Originally Posted by Denville

Royals who engaged in business as Anne etc does, have to stick with various rules and regulations. I understand that this was offered to H and Meghan but they were unwilling to have themselves tied down like that and I suppose they did not wnat (for example) to run a private estate. Anne's primary responsibility is working as a royal...

That was exactly the problem - they didn't want to sign to the rules that every royal that engages in business activities signs to. And it is basically - do not engage in business dealings that bring the RF or the UK into a bad light. Do not trade on the RF name.

Essential they are asked to fly under the radar - Anne is not issuing a statement about how much money she makes and that she is self made and a strong women. Charles does not accept awards as the best landowner in the UK. Even Peter, Zara, Eugenie and Beatrice keep it under the radar. They are not doing interviews as the face of such and such. Even the Middletons have come to follow these guidelines. Can you imagine the concern if Carole Middleton went on TV to promote her company as the mother of the Duchess of Sussex or if Anne does press for the Gatacombe Horse show.


Why couldn't the Sussexes - Their Business Model. It was evident from the first manifesto that their aim was global and their focus was on brand. Brand cannot be achieved without PR and media. They would be selling themselves as global brands - outside of the UK, outside of the RF - essentially they wanted to set themselves as global players in their charity roles. while making money off a business branch. There was no clear distinction between the two and afraid the say there still isnt. It is a moral and ethic concern.
And that is the reason they were denied it. If they had worked to completely divide their charity work and their business concerns it might have been accepted - but that would have meant they would have taken a step backwards in their eyes.

[muriel]

There is piece in the Spectator that some of you may like to read,it raises some interesting issues of accountability.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-meghan-markle

[Mbruno]

Originally Posted by muriel

There is piece in the Spectator that some of you may like to read,it raises some interesting issues of accountability.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-meghan-markle

It makes you wonder how the Cambridges' new Windsor cottage pales in comparison to Harry and Meghan's California mansion. And, despite all the (unfair) criticism about the Cambridges' "three homes", they could still live "grander" if they wanted to, but they don't because, as the Spectator said, they are aware of the dilemma many people in Europe (not only in the UK) are facing now between eating or heating in the winter.

[Erin9]

Originally Posted by Alison H

The podcast interviews could be very good if Meghan would stop trying to make everything about her. I don't know who else is lined up, but Serena Williams and Mariah Carey are very big names.

And why must Meghan lie all the time? Claiming that 40 photographers would have followed her children to school in the UK every day. Has that ever happened with George and Charlotte? The press aren't allowed to hassle children at school. It was just another blatant lie. And I should imagine that Prince Charles is very upset by her saying that Harry's "lost" his father.

The Mandela family aren't impressed by her claims that her wedding was somehow comparable to Nelson Mandela's release from prison.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...an-Markle.html

Agreed. I think the podcast series could be good. And it’s on a subject Meghan is passionate about. But, so far, I don’t think it’s close to what it could be. At all. It doesn’t come across that she really did her prep work to make it something really good. She has a platform. This is it?

And it is heavily focused on herself. That’s been noted.

IDK why Meghan is saying things that can be so easily disproven. The school run story is one of them. We all know it wouldn’t have been an issue for her because it isn’t with the Cambridges. She knows that.

Yeah. The Mandelas were not impressed. Nobody that I’m aware of was with that story. I don’t know what she was thinking telling it. Meghan has so many resources. Couldn’t she have discussed talking points on this interview in advance? I can’t believe anyone would have advised this.

Right up there with talking about concerns over whether she could afford her 14 million dollar dream home. Never a good look really. But in the middle of historic inflation? Again- what was she thinking talking about that?

And 100 dollar candles. She literally has money to burn. (Their money. They can spend it how they choose, of course. But….)

Yes- I can well imagine Charles is hurt by what was said about him and Harry’s relationship.

This interview just seems thoughtless. If I was to put one word to it.

[muriel]

Originally Posted by Erin9

This interview just seems thoughtless.

Given events of the last 3 years or so, it is not just the interview that seems thoughless.

[muriel]

Originally Posted by Mbruno

It makes you wonder how the Cambridges' new Windsor cottage pales in comparison to Harry and Meghan's California mansion. And, despite all the (unfair) criticism about the Cambridges' "three homes", they could still live "grander" if they wanted to, but they don't because, as the Spectator said, they are aware of the dilemma many people in Europe (not only in the UK) are facing now between eating or heating in the winter.

Even KP 1A could probably not be compared to the California home of the Duchess of Montecito.

[Denville]

Originally Posted by Claire

That was exactly the problem - they didn't want to sign to the rules that every royal that engages in business activities signs to. And it is basically - do not engage in business dealings that bring the RF or the UK into a bad light. Do not trade on the RF name.

Essential they are asked to fly under the radar - Anne is not issuing a statement about how much money she makes and that she is self made and a strong women. Charles does not accept awards as the best landowner in the UK. Even Peter, Zara, Eugenie and Beatrice keep it under the radar. They are not doing interviews as the face of such and such. Even the Middletons have come to follow these guidelines. Can you imagine the concern if Carole Middleton went on TV to promote her company as the mother of the Duchess of Sussex or if Anne does press for the Gatacombe Horse show.


Why couldn't the Sussexes - Their Business Model. It was evident from the first manifesto that their aim was global and their focus was on brand. Brand cannot be achieved without PR and media. They would be selling themselves as global brands - outside of the UK, outside of the RF - essentially they wanted to set themselves as global players in their charity roles. while making money off a business branch. There was no clear distinction between the two and afraid the say there still isnt. It is a moral and ethic concern.
And that is the reason they were denied it. If they had worked to completely divide their charity work and their business concerns it might have been accepted - but that would have meant they would have taken a step backwards in their eyes.

thanks I put my point rather badly. what I meant to say was that I beleive that back 2 years ago when they were talking to the RF about their lives, suggestions were made that they could run an estate and lead a quiet life, but also do charity work and work for the queen.. but that if they engaged in business, like running the estate, they would have to stick with various rules..on how they did things.... and they did not want to do that. I suspect that they had no desire to take on a country estate in the UK... either.

[Heavs]

I think Meghan has missed an opportunity with this podcast and publicity interviews.

It could have been a vehicle to show both the public and those who might offer her jobs that she has more to offer than complaining about and threatening her husband's relatives. "Diva" is a complex word with a lot of history - no Meghan it wasn't necessarily "classy" even when it referred exclusively to opera singers. Their lives were far from easy. And there was a reason opera singer also became some what synonymous with "rich man's mistress" in some eras.

Some female performers covet it and are proud of it, like Mariah, but there's still a lot of baggage with it. And what is fine, even expected or entertaining in a singer or dancer is far from what's necessary for a working royal, a philanthropist or even a *working* actress/singer who hasn't "made it". That would have been a good discussion but once again it appears to be a venue for Meghan to complain that she got called a diva when she got with Harry. And she didn't like Mariah calling her one either.

I mean anyone who publicly compares their wedding to Mandela being released from prison.....might perhaps have some of those qualities associated with "Diva's" don't you think, Meghan?

Anyway, once again it isn't rumours or other people that are making the Sussexes look bad or out of touch or liars but their own words and actions. I really wish they'd learn that.

I think they would have been allowed some form of "HIHO" if they had wanted to do anything else other than make money off their titles and status. They were already in contact with Netflix so it's not hard to see that they thought they could make "The Real Crown" with BTS access and have Netflix film real tours which would also be sponsored by Rolex. Which just wasn't going to work and they would don't want anyone overseeing then or telling then which offers they could or couldn't accept. An impossible situation.

[Alison H]

Originally Posted by Heavs

I think they would have been allowed some form of "HIHO" if they had wanted to do anything else other than make money off their titles and status. They were already in contact with Netflix so it's not hard to see that they thought they could make "The Real Crown" with BTS access and have Netflix film real tours which would also be sponsored by Rolex. Which just wasn't going to work and they would don't want anyone overseeing then or telling then which offers they could or couldn't accept. An impossible situation.

I can see this happening with Charlotte and Louis. If they could get "ordinary" jobs, maybe the sort of thing that Beatrice and Eugenie do, which could be done part time, and carry out royal duties part time, I think that could work. It could only work with certain jobs, though. It didn't work for Sophie because PR is inevitably largely about who you know, not just what you do. But it worked for William when he was being an ambulance pilot.

[HRHHermione]

Originally Posted by Alison H

I can see this happening with Charlotte and Louis. If they could get "ordinary" jobs, maybe the sort of thing that Beatrice and Eugenie do, which could be done part time, and carry out royal duties part time, I think that could work. It could only work with certain jobs, though. It didn't work for Sophie because PR is inevitably largely about who you know, not just what you do. But it worked for William when he was being an ambulance pilot.

Honestly, it’s a shame so few of the family want to pursue higher education. Working in academia learning and studying is respected, quiet, and dignified. It could easily be combined with some royal duties.

That’s one of the reasons Harry is at such a loss right now I think. He was really only prepared for one job: Prince of the UK. He doesn’t have an education or other skills to fall back on so all he has to sell to earn a living are his memories of his family which is quite sad.

(That being said, his inheritance money could have funded them for a long time in a more modest lifestyle, so that part is definitely a choice they have made)

[Erin9]

Originally Posted by muriel

There is piece in the Spectator that some of you may like to read,it raises some interesting issues of accountability.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...-meghan-markle

This is an interesting article. Thanks.

The author raises good points, in general, but particularly about accusing unnamed media of using the n- word about her child. As best I can tell- this is entirely based on her word, and she’s given no one the ability to substantiate anything because it’s vague.

I may be incorrect in my understanding of this, but it sounds like a serious accusation that blankets everyone with zero way for anyone to even respond to since it’s vague.

[Mbruno]

Originally Posted by HRHHermione

Honestly, it’s a shame so few of the family want to pursue higher education. Working in academia learning and studying is respected, quiet, and dignified. It could easily be combined with some royal duties.

That’s one of the reasons Harry is at such a loss right now I think. He was really only prepared for one job: Prince of the UK. He doesn’t have an education or other skills to fall back on so all he has to sell to earn a living are his memories of his family which is quite sad.

(That being said, his inheritance money could have funded them for a long time in a more modest lifestyle, so that part is definitely a choice they have made)

Beatrice and Eugenie got university degrees. And Louise is starting her university course this year. I believe James will go to university too, but it's too early to say.


Frankly I'd be surprised if Louis and Charlotte didn't go to university unless Louis, like Andrew and Harry, chooses a military career. It is a shame that, in the UK, an officer's training in the Army still does not involve getting a Bachelor's degree simultaneously as in other countries.

[Sionevar]

Originally Posted by Erin9

This is an interesting article. Thanks.

The author raises good points, in general, but particularly about accusing unnamed media of using the n- word about her child. As best I can tell- this is entirely based on her word, and she’s given no one the ability to substantiate anything because it’s vague.

I may be incorrect in my understanding of this, but it sounds like a serious accusation that blankets everyone with zero way for anyone to even respond to since it’s vague.

Articles I am reading today interpret the statement as applying to readers of the RR output, not the RR members themselves.

Meaning, someone, somewhere in a forum or comments column used the n-word about Archie. Which I can well believe, given the bile I see on the internet every day.