The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #621  
Old 12-02-2021, 10:32 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: N/A, Bulgaria
Posts: 760
I don't think it's surprising at all. The dragging of the issue itself is in ANL's favour. They want to discuss it, make noise, generate news. And if they can win at the end - sure, it would be nice but this isn't their primary objective, IMO.
  #622  
Old 12-02-2021, 10:52 AM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 12,262
Exactly. They want to keep this lawsuit on the front burner...perhaps out of a desire for revenge.

The more it stays in the spotlight the more embarrassing and unflattering for the Sussexes.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"If your dreams don't scare you, they are not big enough" Sir Sidney Poitier
1927-2022
  #623  
Old 12-02-2021, 11:40 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: N/A, Bulgaria
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
Exactly. They want to keep this lawsuit on the front burner...perhaps out of a desire for revenge.

The more it stays in the spotlight the more embarrassing and unflattering for the Sussexes.
Of course. Especially when the court practically said that the five friends and People lied to make Thomas Markle look bad.

Perhaps Meghan forgot that she sent her friends to discredit her father? She said she didn't but can her memory be trusted? After all, the court victory she's currently celebrating specifically said that she had suffered a memory loss. Was that the only case of it?

The tabloids will have a feast day over this. And since it came from the court and not white, pale, stale courtiers, Meghan can't wield her favourite weapon - to cry that it was a lie designed to discredit her.

It would have been so much better if they had just kept silent. The letter "scandal" had run its course and people were far more sympathetic to Meghan at the time. But the Sussexes just can't leave it at this, it seems.
  #624  
Old 12-02-2021, 12:17 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
:p
The more it stays in the spotlight the more embarrassing and unflattering for the Sussexes.
I really don't think it's as embarrassing for the Sussexes.

The Daily Mail is so notorious, that as there as many who are happy that the Sussexes are being tailed; there are equally as many content to see the Mail get its comeuppance. So score draw.

The paper's reputation is such that whatever they attack Meghan with will continue to be more or less, preaching to the choir at this point.

Anyway almost all legal eagles that this Supreme Court appeal is more about dragging this out for as long as possible, than the likelihood of a Supreme Court hearing, nevermind a win.
  #625  
Old 12-02-2021, 01:05 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 13,235
I agree the Daily Mail has no equivalent in the world with the same outreach and the same intense malice. Even when Meghan's position was purely angelic in a crystal clear innocence, the DM is able to portay her as the reÔncarnation of the Wh*re of Babylon, The Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth (Revelations 7, verse 5). The DM is pure evil, with a poisonous pen.
  #626  
Old 12-02-2021, 01:16 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 9,361
In Meghan's response, accusing the MoS of 'making a straightforward case extraordinarily convoluted in order to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers' stands out to me. Especially, since it was Meghan herself who convoluted the straightforward case (copyright) into a war against the tabloids - which she is even doing in this statement as she keeps talking about 'harmful practices' and a 'daily fail' instead of the very specific and limited case at hand. So, I am afraid that while true that they 'feast' on dragging this case along, she is as much to blame for convoluting this case as the tabloids are.
  #627  
Old 12-02-2021, 01:19 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 9,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moran View Post
Of course. Especially when the court practically said that the five friends and People lied to make Thomas Markle look bad.

Perhaps Meghan forgot that she sent her friends to discredit her father? She said she didn't but can her memory be trusted? After all, the court victory she's currently celebrating specifically said that she had suffered a memory loss. Was that the only case of it?

The tabloids will have a feast day over this. And since it came from the court and not white, pale, stale courtiers, Meghan can't wield her favourite weapon - to cry that it was a lie designed to discredit her.

It would have been so much better if they had just kept silent. The letter "scandal" had run its course and people were far more sympathetic to Meghan at the time. But the Sussexes just can't leave it at this, it seems.
The court more precisely said that AT BEST this was an unfortunate lapse of memory on her part. This to me suggests that they don't really buy that argument but aren't pursuing it further because 'it did not bear on the issues'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Bik View Post
I really don't think it's as embarrassing for the Sussexes.

The Daily Mail is so notorious
, that as there as many who are happy that the Sussexes are being tailed; there are equally as many content to see the Mail get its comeuppance. So score draw.

The paper's reputation is such that whatever they attack Meghan with will continue to be more or less, preaching to the choir at this point.

Anyway almost all legal eagles that this Supreme Court appeal is more about dragging this out for as long as possible, than the likelihood of a Supreme Court hearing, nevermind a win.
It's not the Daily Mail that was sued (although Meghan samed to make a word play on them by using 'daily fail'). What is embarrassing is not the publications by the tabloids but the fact that it was proven that Meghan LIED in court.

So, portraying it as 'irrelevant' because the defendants are a tabloid, seems a way of dodging the real issue, which is that Meghan's portrayal of a situation cannot be trusted.
  #628  
Old 12-02-2021, 04:03 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 6,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody View Post
The court more precisely said that AT BEST this was an unfortunate lapse of memory on her part. This to me suggests that they don't really buy that argument but aren't pursuing it further because 'it did not bear on the issues'.


It's not the Daily Mail that was sued (although Meghan samed to make a word play on them by using 'daily fail'). What is embarrassing is not the publications by the tabloids but the fact that it was proven that Meghan LIED in court.

So, portraying it as 'irrelevant' because the defendants are a tabloid, seems a way of dodging the real issue, which is that Meghan's portrayal of a situation cannot be trusted.
Agreed and now as you stated "that her portrayal of a situation cannot be trusted" IMO, it has dealt a significant blow to her credibility.
  #629  
Old 12-02-2021, 04:41 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 236
I found this article in the telegraph to be interesting:


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-fa...chess-sussexs/
  #630  
Old 12-02-2021, 04:50 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,256
I thought she had not cooperated with the FINDING FREEDOM book; but now apparently she is saying she may have??

Why is she then not suing about the bullying claims?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Pinocchio.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-lawsuit.html
  #631  
Old 12-02-2021, 04:54 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 9,361
Apparently, children in Manchester had to do a school project on racism based on how Meghan was treated by the press. See The Telegraph (archive).

Quote:
Originally Posted by angieuk View Post
I thought she had not cooperated with the FINDING FREEDOM book; but now apparently she is saying she may have??

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Pinocchio.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-lawsuit.html
Yes, see the many posts in this thread about Meghan lying in court about not cooperating/passing on information, now -after proof was given that she did- indicating that she 'forgot' that she gave very specific instructions to one of her staff members.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
I found this article in the telegraph to be interesting:


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-fa...chess-sussexs/
Archived link.

Interesting indeed. I didn't expect this court case to result in calls for new laws to 'rebalance' the balance between freedom of speech and privacy.
  #632  
Old 12-02-2021, 05:10 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: N/A, Bulgaria
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody View Post
Apparently, children in Manchester had to do a school project on racism based on how Meghan was treated by the press. See The Telegraph (archive).
I saw this a few days ago. I noticed the nature of the supplied options for answer. All in Meghan's favour.

If there was an option including information about Meghan's memory lapse when the court asked an uncomfortable question, I didn't see it. Until one is provided and given the overall presented perspective, I'd say it was incredibly one-sided.

I feel it's pretty safe to guess that the teachers compared Meghan's treatment by the press with Catherine's treatment now, not in the years the press literally chased Catherine and brought her family down.

They didn't compare Meghan's press with the one Camilla the Blonde received for years.

I'm not impressed.
  #633  
Old 12-02-2021, 06:23 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erin9 View Post
Agreed.

I donít think it has hurt them business- wise/financially.

But- both of their reputations have taken something of a hit to win this. Neither came out of this looking good imo- manipulative, conniving and liars/perjurers are words that come to mind. My guess is this will follow them- on some level- for a long time.
But has it? Really? I personally don't think it changed a thing based off the reactions I have seen from the various global medias. If you supported her, you likely still do. If you don't think much of her... nothing has changed.

I see plenty of people who don't care one way or another praising her for just wining against a tabloid they hate. I see a lot of that. So I don't think her reputation has been damaged whatsoever.

It pretty much is what it is.
  #634  
Old 12-02-2021, 06:37 PM
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 99
The Guardian verdict

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...bloid-culture#

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ay-by-surprise
  #635  
Old 12-02-2021, 06:58 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,571
I am very very glad that this notorious newspaper group was not allowed leave to appeal. Itís a blow against rancid tabloid journalism. And appeals to the Supreme Court are very very rarely granted. Hope the apology is on the front page of the Mail onSunday soon.
  #636  
Old 12-02-2021, 07:37 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 1,944
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
But has it? Really? I personally don't think it changed a thing based off the reactions I have seen from the various global medias. If you supported her, you likely still do. If you don't think much of her... nothing has changed.

I see plenty of people who don't care one way or another praising her for just wining against a tabloid they hate. I see a lot of that. So I don't think her reputation has been damaged whatsoever.

It pretty much is what it is.
I agree to a point, few people will change their minds based on this. The vast majority of people don't feel strongly one way or another. But the allegation of perjury will be raised repeatedly the next time she makes another complaint about the royal family. People in the middle who would otherwise be sympathetic to her will likely be more skeptical.
  #637  
Old 12-02-2021, 08:32 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 6,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher View Post
I agree to a point, few people will change their minds based on this. The vast majority of people don't feel strongly one way or another. But the allegation of perjury will be raised repeatedly the next time she makes another complaint about the royal family. People in the middle who would otherwise be sympathetic to her will likely be more skeptical.

Good points US Royal Watcher and yes I believe that the majority of people really don't have strong feelings one way or another, but should she or Prince Harry make another complaint about anything ie an alleged lack of support from the BRF or the staff/courtiers it is likely to raise skepticism.
  #638  
Old 12-02-2021, 08:50 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher View Post
I agree to a point, few people will change their minds based on this. The vast majority of people don't feel strongly one way or another. But the allegation of perjury will be raised repeatedly the next time she makes another complaint about the royal family. People in the middle who would otherwise be sympathetic to her will likely be more skeptical.
She didn't commit perjury, no matter how much people want to claim it. And even with that I don't think most people think that deeply about it. I see a lot of her critics very much focusing on it but honestly not even the judges did. As I said I just don't think it moved the needle one way or another. And I would bet the next couple of weeks will prove it.
  #639  
Old 12-02-2021, 09:24 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLLK View Post
Agreed and now as you stated "that her portrayal of a situation cannot be trusted" IMO, it has dealt a significant blow to her credibility.

I don't know about that, it's not like she had much credibility before.

When she gave that interview with Oprah, I remember reading that there were 17 inaccurate allegations in it.
So why would anyone be surprised now?
  #640  
Old 12-03-2021, 02:44 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LONDON, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,256
I still think she would have been a great asset to the Royal Family, carrying out public engagements; but it all turned sour very quickly.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...ome-court.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...xpression.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...er-father.html
Closed Thread

Tags
archie mountbatten-windsor, duchess of sussex, duke of sussex, lili mountbatten-windsor


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family, News and Events 7: Oct. 2022 - Apr. 2023 Marengo The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family 2260 04-18-2023 11:22 PM
Charlotte Casiraghi Current Events 20 : Aug.2006 - Oct.2006 Lady Jennifer Current Events Archive 192 10-28-2006 09:38 AM
Princess Alexandra Current Events 4 : Aug.2005 - Oct.2005 Gabriella Current Events Archive 192 10-22-2005 02:34 PM




Popular Tags
#alnahyan #alnahyanwedding #baby #rashidmrm abolished monarchies baptism bevilacqua british caroline christenings coat of arms commonwealth countries crest defunct thrones edward vii emperor naruhito fabio bevilacqua fallen empires fallen kingdom fifa women's world cup football france godfather grace kelly grand duke henri grimaldi harry hollywood hotel room for sale house of gonzaga international events jewellery jewels king king charles king george list of rulers mall coronation day monaco new zealand; cyclone gabrielle official visit order of the redeemer overseas tours pamela hicks preferences prince & princess of wales prince albert monaco prince christian princeharry princess alexia of the netherlands princess of wales q: reputable place? queen queen alexandra queen camilla queen elizabeth ii queen elizabeth ii style queen ena of spain queen mathilde ray mill royal christenings royal without thrones silk soccer spanish royal family state visit state visit to germany switzerland tiaras william


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2023
Jelsoft Enterprises