So in Oprah's mind, broadcasting the "truth" made it necessary to alter headlines because she couldn't find enough real headlines to back up the Sussexes claims.
Oprah is also congratulating herself on publicizing a smear of the entire royal family (except the Queen and Prince Philip) by allowing the allegation to be aired without naming the actual individual supposedly involved. A decision that is made even more indefensible after Harry and Meghan couldn't even agree on the basic facts.
Oprah also let many lies go unchallenged, such as Archie wasn't a prince because of his heritage, their taxpayer funded security ended because of racism, etc.
Oprah also failed to press Meghan to respond to the bullying allegations but allowed Meghan to claim, without evidence, that Harry's family was leaking false information about her.
Oprah should stick to what she knows: entertainment, which is about creating appearances not revealing facts or even "truth.".
May I ask something as your are american or live there.
Is there any critical discussion about Oprah in the US in general?
I looked up her twitter and surprise surprise one cannot comment on the Sussex tweet and other stuff is limited for her friends only to comment, so does she need this control because otherwise thousands of tweets would be flooding her account or is it just a method of her pr? I saw only few critical answers left to later tweets (as the sussex is blocked from comments) and am surprised because so many are upset and usually many use social media to tell their opinion, anger or whatever but nobody seems to focus in the really bad job Oprah has done in this "interview", except dropping her jaw in "useful" moments a robot had done a better job asking questions ect
Being danish, married to a Brit I have never been interested in Oprah's work, but after this desaster I wonder how anyone can consider her a serious journalist (maybe she is not I don't know).
Thanks.