Hallo girl
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,158
- City
- Scotland
- Country
- United Kingdom
I am going to throw something in the mix for discussion, we have no idea of the context of any discussions that took place around titles and security.
I have made a comment on here that I felt Meghan said a sentence out of a paragraph , with no context, as a result led people down a particular train of thought.
I have wondered if the no security for Archie was more in connection with when he became an adult, as with Beatrice and Eugenie, just a thought.
What I did want to add to our conversation was that according to Meghan and Harry, they did not blindside the queen as they had been in discussions for 2 years, even told her when they would issue the statement. We have all noted that they were prepared with the website etc so it wasn't a spur of the moment thought to move on. Which would go back to early 2018, before they were married.
They had been looking at Canada, New Zealand and Africa
So is it possible that the decision with regards no titles could have been in connection with them moving on as non working royals. The couple have agreed not to use HRH in their business dealings.
If they had already told the family that they wanted to work in a different way it was possibly thought prudent not to give Archie a title at a young age.
Interested in your views.
I have made a comment on here that I felt Meghan said a sentence out of a paragraph , with no context, as a result led people down a particular train of thought.
I have wondered if the no security for Archie was more in connection with when he became an adult, as with Beatrice and Eugenie, just a thought.
What I did want to add to our conversation was that according to Meghan and Harry, they did not blindside the queen as they had been in discussions for 2 years, even told her when they would issue the statement. We have all noted that they were prepared with the website etc so it wasn't a spur of the moment thought to move on. Which would go back to early 2018, before they were married.
They had been looking at Canada, New Zealand and Africa
So is it possible that the decision with regards no titles could have been in connection with them moving on as non working royals. The couple have agreed not to use HRH in their business dealings.
If they had already told the family that they wanted to work in a different way it was possibly thought prudent not to give Archie a title at a young age.
Interested in your views.