The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #941  
Old 07-21-2018, 03:07 PM
loonytick's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tennessee, United States
Posts: 755
Jr. is the most unhinged of the trio. Sr. is very focused on feeling “respected.” Sam seems to be reading tabloid headlines and shifting her message in direct reaction to them as an effort to ride some existing tide of sentiment (not that she’s good at it, but there’s clearly calculation there). But Jr. seems to just have random, disconnected ideas and act on them on a whim.
__________________

  #942  
Old 07-21-2018, 03:11 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
I'm not sure that Sr really wants any of those things. I think he is caught up in the hysteria of it all. And sometimes people sabotage their opportunities for strange reasons.


The Jr ambush story was--supposedly Jr approached Sr about a detente and reconciliation. Sr agreed to meet Jr, but Jr had a photographer and reporter with him.
Mr Markle has now a few times said in his interviews, that he wants to meet the Queen. Samantha has demanded the Coat of Arms for him. Jr demanded royal titles.

My point really was, that Mr Markle wouldn't just settle for meeting up with Meghan in private. He has made it clear, that he wants to make profit out of Meghan being a royal, and he is just doing that.

As for Jr bringing paparazzi with him. Jr seems to be taking a page out of his father's book, but now Mr Markle doesn't like it?!
__________________

  #943  
Old 07-21-2018, 03:55 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 5,874
He would have met the queen had he come to London for the wedding. It seems like his own erratic actions led to a high stress level and some health issues. He might even had had anothr opportunity at some point in the future had he tried to build a good relationdhip with Meghan. So, he has only himself to blame.
  #944  
Old 07-21-2018, 03:59 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
This is why there will never be a quiet meeting between Meghan and Mr Markle. He doesn't want contact with Meghan. He doesn't want to rebuild that relationship. He wants a royal title, Coat of Arms, to meet the Queen, to be greeted with red carpets, to be able to give interviews about Meghan freely, whenever he wants to.

I fully believe that Mr Markle and his two older children are working together, all giving interviews, writing open letters and tweeting in turns to trash Meghan. That story Mr Markle told about Thomas Jr ambushing him with the paparazzi makes no sense. Was Jr there camping at the border waiting for daddy? He had to have had Mr Markle's travel itinerary to know when he'd arrive. Having contact is the means to that, that's all.

But yeah, delusions of grandeur, re Snr somehow needing and getting royal titles.

The M.rkle family tactics are the same. The son was dumb enough to spell out their main tactic in that letter to his lawyer which is embarass Meghan inorder to get a payout. This is extortion. All members of that family use the same shaming language. The same over the top claims. The same gaslighting tactics. The same bad cop/good cop tactics. Their scheme is to confuse, control, exhaust and embarrass Meghan.



The media is not going to ask questions. They questioned Doria more over her dreadlocks than they question the half sister over her child abuse record or the half brother over his domestic abuse, or the emotional verbal tactics that the father uses.



Its extortion by all three working together along with the UK media who sees them as an asset. Time to get a REAL fixer!!
  #945  
Old 07-21-2018, 04:21 PM
XeniaCasaraghi's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Texas, United States
Posts: 3,690
The UK media are scum but I also hold other media outlets to task for not continuously calling out these low lifes. How can anyone give a platform to a woman who chooses a pedophile over her own child.
  #946  
Old 07-21-2018, 04:29 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
Why are other media outlets silent. That is the question. Investigative reporting seems to be a lost art. When I read articles about Doria they always reference her nose ring and dread locks. However articles about the half siblings only repeat their narrative building words, their hateful words without mentioning their record of domestic abuse, child abuse, lying about car accidents. They are given an open platform and a blank check to verbally abuse and bully Meghan.


If only the media would spend all this energy going after politicians.
  #947  
Old 07-21-2018, 04:41 PM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
Mr Markle has now a few times said in his interviews, that he wants to meet the Queen. Samantha has demanded the Coat of Arms for him. Jr demanded royal titles.

My point really was, that Mr Markle wouldn't just settle for meeting up with Meghan in private. He has made it clear, that he wants to make profit out of Meghan being a royal, and he is just doing that.

As for Jr bringing paparazzi with him. Jr seems to be taking a page out of his father's book, but now Mr Markle doesn't like it?!
I don't think he really wants to meet the Queen, he could have and would have with different choices. I think he is deliberately sabotaging his chances.
  #948  
Old 07-21-2018, 05:02 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,123
You can't make this Markle stuff up. Somewhere, there's a producer that just may get the idea from these people for a new, revised situation comedy that has it roots in the old "Beveryly Hillbillies" sitcom. Revise it as "London Loonies" or something similar. Even A&E's "The Royals" is tamer than this family.

The ignorance of the Markles as to just how the British monarchy and the Queen works is blatantly obvious. Its the glitz and the glam that attracts them such as a Coat of Arms and titles and status and not the inner workings of how these things happen. Mr. Michael Middleton was never granted a title because of his daughter. Major Ronald Ferguson was never granted a title because of his daughter. Earl Spencer had the title before his daughter married Charles and Christopher Rhys-Jones never got a title either. But Thomas Markle deserves one just because he had sex with Meghan's mother 37 some years ago.

Thomas, Jr. reminds me of California and beaches so very much. He reminds me of beach wear called flip flops. He vehemently says something outrageous and then adamantly and contritely apologizes with crocodile tears. Its a ploy and its getting old.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #949  
Old 07-21-2018, 05:15 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Quote:
He vehemently says something outrageous and then adamantly and contritely apologizes with crocodile tears.
How STRANGE that i'm reminded of another American with a considerably 'higher profile' atm..
  #950  
Old 07-21-2018, 05:21 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville View Post
Theere have been almost no hereditary peerages given out now in the last 20 or 30 years. it was never on, as far as I know for Mrs T or any reitired politican to get an earldom or an hereditary title.

It was always on. But most former prime ministers didn't take the elevation. The last one to do so was Clement Attlee, who in 1955 became Earl Attlee and Viscount Prestwood. Today his grandson John Richard, 3. Earl Attlee is still a member of the House of Lords (he was voted to remain when the reform took place). After Lord Attlee the labour prime ministers refused the elevation, but when Lady Thatcher (as the wife of Sir Denis) was offered, she could have taken the dignity.


After she refused, though, I doubt it was again offered for the likes of Blair, Cameron etc. would have grabbed the peerage. (IMHO, of course).


John Major eg became a Knight of the Garter, who IMHO is much more than just be3coming a peer of the peerage of the UK.
  #951  
Old 07-21-2018, 05:29 PM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
How STRANGE that i'm reminded of another American with a considerably 'higher profile' atm..
The technique seems to work on some folks.
  #952  
Old 07-21-2018, 05:46 PM
Tarlita's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,207
For a start wouldn't Thomas Markle senior have to be a British citizen first
To receive a title.
  #953  
Old 07-21-2018, 06:05 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,123
On top of being a British citizen, he would also have to do something of merit to earn a title or an honor. Having one's rantings in tabloids on an almost daily basis doesn't quite qualify him for it.

ETA: Well... maybe not. See my rationalizing in the Prince Harry Created The Duke of Sussex thread.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #954  
Old 07-21-2018, 07:01 PM
Tarlita's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,207
So no dragons left to slay. No battles to be won for the crown. Very slim odds indeed.
  #955  
Old 07-21-2018, 07:04 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
I believe that there were good reasons why Harry didnít meet Sr. before the wedding.
Yes I think what is going on now with him explains the questions about Harry not meeting him, was he coming to the wedding etc.



LaRae
  #956  
Old 07-21-2018, 08:41 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 5,563
Meghan Markle's sister is 'being lined up to appear on Celebrity Big Brother' as Channel 5 courts controversial cast list for upcoming reality TV show
Meghan Markle's sister is 'being lined up to appear on Celebrity Big Brother' | Daily Mail Online

Samantha has been trying to bill at all costs at Meghan's expense. And it seems to be practically confirmed in Big Brother Celebrity.
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
  #957  
Old 07-21-2018, 08:44 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blog Real View Post
Meghan Markle's sister is 'being lined up to appear on Celebrity Big Brother' as Channel 5 courts controversial cast list for upcoming reality TV show
Meghan Markle's sister is 'being lined up to appear on Celebrity Big Brother' | Daily Mail Online

Samantha has been trying to bill at all costs at Meghan's expense. And it seems to be practically confirmed in Big Brother Celebrity.
I will say it again. I don't believe the rumor. She is enjoying the attention.
  #958  
Old 07-21-2018, 08:45 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,123
Samantha has also come out stating that she would not be talking about Meghan on CBB. Well... if that's the case, what else about her could possibly be interesting? She may think she's not going to talk about Meghan but anyone else in that "house" is going to use Samantha's prattling and ranting and bleating about Meghan against her.

The woman is delusional in this respect, IMO. She's a legend in her own mind. But that's just my opinion.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #959  
Old 07-21-2018, 08:46 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 5,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlo View Post
I will say it again. I don't believe the rumor. She is enjoying the attention.
Yes, she likes the attention. Samantha likes to be talked about, regardless of why it's news.
__________________
My blogs about monarchies
  #960  
Old 07-21-2018, 10:18 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
We can all blame the media, and yes, they carry a lot of the blame for the Markle drama in addition to the Markles being willing participants for money!

However, we as the public carry some of the blame as well. We click on the stories of the Markles that garner hundreds or thousands of comments. Even if you are a Meghan supporter, when you click on a Markle story, you represent one of those hundreds or thousands of clicks. So when the Daily Mail for example sees that its website gets thousands of clicks, then it is only obvious they will keep writing the Markle stories..even if they are totally made up ones. Samantha does not care...even when all of the comments are against her...publicity is publicity whether it is good or bad! She still gets the attention that she so desparately desires and feeds off of!

We read Samantha's twitter tirades and report on them. We discuss these 3 dysfunctional people in this thread. We read Tom Jr's outlandish and obnoxious 'open letters' in trash magazines/websites! We look at Tom Snr's staged money-earning pics! etc...etc...etc...and on and on it goes....
If we weren't interested, there would be no reason for the media to give these people the publicity they covet! We are part of the problem!

I keep going back to the UK tabloid media's reaction to Harry's romance with Meghan when it became public! The vile racist headlines associating Meghan as growing up in a gang neighbourhood specifically! Harry called the media out for their reporting! Since then, it seems to me that since some of the UK media don't want to appear as openly racist as they will like to be, they now use the Markles to further their agenda to denigrate Meghan in every way! Some of the UK media will never call out the WHITE Markles for what they are doing because these 3 vile people have become the tabloids' medium to consistently push their agenda that Meghan represents their idea of a black social climber and goldigger who has no right to be in the lily white BRF! I wonder if the black side of the family was acting like the white Markles...if the media would have focused more on the negative aspects of their characters? OF COURSE the media would have because it is expected that black people will act in that embarrassing way!!!

And I willingly admit that I am also part of the public that isn't blameless! But I have started my eforts to change that...My tolerance level for these 3 Markles has now become so low that I have gotten to the point where I no longer read anything about them....I sincerely hope that feeling grows with the public as times goes by!

I have also stopped commenting in this thread as much and hopefully this will be my last comment here unless something really major occurs. I wish there was an ignore list for specific threads similar to adding posters to an ignore list because this thread would definitely be on my ignore thread list as it now only documents the emotional abuse, bullying and blackmail that Meghan has been subjected to by these 3 people - 2 of which she clearly has no relationship with or consider to be family!

I no longer want to be part of the public/consumers that give these Markles the publicity and attention that they DO NOT DESERVE!
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Duchess of Cambridge: Family, Wealth and Background sara1981 The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 3057 04-05-2021 07:27 AM
The Royal Foundation of Duke & Duchess of Cambridge and Duke & Duchess of Sussex ghost_night554 British Royals 574 09-07-2019 12:14 AM




Popular Tags
abdication america anastasia anastasia once upon a time archie mountbatten-windsor background story baptism biography bridal gown britain british british royal family china chinese commonwealth countries countess of snowdon customs daisy doge of venice doll dubai duke of sussex facts family life fashion and style george vi gustaf vi adolf hello! imperial household intro italian royal family jack brooksbank jacobite japan jewellery king edward vii king willem-alexander książ castle line of succession list of rulers luxembourg mary: crown princess of denmark meghan markle nepalese royal jewels plantinum jubilee prince constantijn prince dimitri princess catharina-amalia princess chulabhorn walailak princess ribha queen consort queen mathilde queen maxima random facts royal ancestry royal dress-ups royal jewels royal marriage royal re-enactments. royal wedding royal wedding gown serbian royal family solomon j solomon speech suthida taiwan tradition uae customs united states of america wittelsbach


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×