The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1821  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:28 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7 View Post
If they were in their 20's still I would agree that it may be premature. But they are in their 30's they want to have kids I understand. They perhaps don't want to wait 2-5 years to date in public to marry.



They have been courting but privately and discreetly. They have had dinner dates with Will and Kate and Beatrice and her finacee. So they have been out some.





What we think may be premature may not be what Harry thinks and that is what matters here.

How could they have had dinner dates with Beatrice's fiancé if Beatrice has been single since July and was never engaged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7 View Post
It's too early right now?? How much is enough time, 5 years?? Come on!! They are in their 30's and they both want kids. Harry is NOT going to wait like Wills and Kate did. The most he'll wait will be year and I doubt he'll wait that long honestly.


They have been dating for almost 7 months, not just a couple.

Ya know, a couple years ago or so I asked if you all 'thought Harry would ever date an American woman and many said no that you do doubted he ever would. Well, today he is doing just that and to boot she is biracial.

Given as Meghan is likely going to have to uproot her life, move to London, and give up her career in order to marry Harry I think it's safe to say the two of them aren't going to just jump into marriage. Sure they've been together 7 months. Sure they're not in their 20s. But a marriage is a huge undertaking and even more so when it comes with the expectations that a royal marriage entails. It would be stupid of them to rush to the alter.

Also, once again, Meghan is under contract for another season of Suits. She legally can't quit acting until after then. And royal engagements tend to be fairly short. So don't go holding your breath until Harry walks down the aisle.
__________________

  #1822  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:50 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 489
I read somewhere that they have been out with Harry and Meghan, at least Beatrice and her financee.

Some royal experts say that they see no reason why she can't continue as actress . Times are changing people and so do rules.

I'd bet odd they'll engaged while she is filming season 7! And afterwards she may continue. We'll see.
__________________

  #1823  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:53 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7 View Post
I read somewhere that they have been out with Harry and Meghan, at least Beatrice and her financee.

Some royal experts say that they see no reason why she can't continue as actress . Times are changing people and so do rules.

I bet odd they'll engaged while she is filming season 7! And afterwards she may continue. We'll see.

Beatrice is not engaged. Beatrice is single. Beatrice has never been engaged.

Any paper you're reading that is claiming Harry and Meghan are dining with Beatrice and her fiancé is flat out lying, because Beatrice does not have a fiancé and has never had a fiancé.
  #1824  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:54 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
Also, if these royal experts are the same ones claiming that Harry is dining with Beatrice and her fiancé, then they aren't royal experts.
  #1825  
Old 12-07-2016, 10:17 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 13,212
Remember that Harry needs the Queen's permission to marry if he and his children are to remain in the line of succession.

Until she has been introduced to The Queen there won't be a wedding and the Queen is known to be wary of short courtships after the marriages of her sister and three of her children that followed short courtships of less than a couple of years.

Of course Harry could marry without consent but he would lose his place and his children also wouldn't be in the line. In that scenario it is highly likely that he wouldn't get a title or his children become HRH's - certainly not with new LPs to create them as such before Charles becomes King.
  #1826  
Old 12-07-2016, 10:53 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,378
The Queen may very well be wary, may even counsel Harry privately to wait a while, but I very much doubt that she would forbid a marriage between two thirty somethings who are deeply in love and if there was nothing to object to in the bride's background. After Harry and Meghan have been going out for a year I think there may well be an engagement, and I can foresee a wedding six months after that. This couple would want a family. They aren't going to have around for five years or so.
  #1827  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:03 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
Louis had to give up his succession rights to marry Tessy not because she was an unwed mother but because she was a commoner - the marriage was morganatic. That's also why Noah doesn't have succession rights; when Louis gave up his, he did so for all his future children.

Friso marries without consent from Parliament, which is why he lost his succession rights automatically when he got married. This was done deliberately, as Mabel's past was seen as something that would hinder the consent from being granted, but still. If Harry were to dash off to Vegas with Meghan and get married he'd lose his succession rights as well for marrying without the permission of the monarch - until not too recently, the marriage wouldn't have been legal. The loss of succession rights is progress for the Brits.
My point obviously missed, was just because on country finds something like soft porn acceptable doesn't mean others would. There have been cases of marriages refused.

i am sorry but if you think Tessy didn't get a title simply because she was morgantic, look at the family. Louis's own mother, the grand duchess, is a commoner. Yet Louis and his siblings are heirs. Felix married a commoner, but Amalia and Liam are in line. Sibilla is a commoner, but her husband and their kids are in line. In no way was it simply because Tessy was a commoner.

And the Dutch are like the swedes, the monarch decides if they ask permission from parliament. Carl and Sofia had to get parliament okay. Frisco didn't apply, he knew because of Mabel's past, they wouldn't get it.

The point is, contrary to what the other poster said, Sofia and Mette aren't proof all monarchies have lost all standards, and as long as you are not a criminal, you will be approved.
  #1828  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:04 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Terri View Post
You took the words right out of my mouth! And I must add, both the Prince of Wales and his now spouse - the Duchess of Cornwall - engaged in an adulterous relationship with each other!
The British royals live in a glass house...they can't throw stones at Prince Harry's relationship with Meghan.
Right!

I mean I still remember tampon gate, Squidgygate, Toesuckinggate I'm like Harry and Meghan are just two crazy kids who want to date. Why are people blowing this out of proportion! They are boring compared to the 80's and 90's.
  #1829  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:08 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Scottsdale, United States
Posts: 26
Maybe one of the reasons these two are still trying to keep things under cover a bit has to do with safety concerns for Meghan. If pictures of them together is going to stir the hornets nest back up they may not want them to come out until Meghan's back on set filming suits. That way her security will be provided for by the series and her cast mates and crew can act as a bit of a buffer.
  #1830  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:18 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
The previous poster intended to say Eugenie and her Boyfriend which is an accurate story... Not Beatrice.
  #1831  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:30 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
This is an interesting article: http://www.thedailybeast....to-see-meghan-markle

It does rake Harry over the coals but it brings up an interesting point that Harry was willing to break the rules in order to visit Meghan in Toronto, it was not just a "booty call", it must have been about something important, maybe an agreement to move their relationship to the next level. Judging by both their smiles, it went well.
  #1832  
Old 12-07-2016, 11:54 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
^
"The statement was, predictably, completely ineffective as to its stated aims"

With this I completely disagree. Harry called out the racist undertones, the sexism, and harassing Meghan's mother in his statement. I believe that has toned down.
I don't think Harry or Meghan thought, that his statement would stop the paparazzi, or interest in Meghan. But the tone of the articles written about her has changed.
  #1833  
Old 12-08-2016, 12:06 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia View Post
The previous poster intended to say Eugenie and her Boyfriend which is an accurate story... Not Beatrice.

OH okay!! Yes!! Thank you. Wrong York Sister.
  #1834  
Old 12-08-2016, 02:38 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,722
I wouldn't start placing bets on any marriage quite yet either. Right now, these are two people that have extremely busy and fulfilling lives as individuals and have found that they enjoy being with each other in a long distance kind of relationship.

Right now, I think they're both just waiting to see which way the wind blows and if it could develop into something more permanent such as marriage and family. Both Harry and Meghan grew up with a divorce in their family. Both Harry and Meghan have commitments in their lives that they cannot just walk away from. Both Harry and Meghan know there are bumps in the road ahead once they step out in public as an "official" couple.

I think they're going to take their sweet time and make sure of things before jumping off the cliff into the public eye. Him with a UK flag parachute and her with a Stars and Stripes parachute.

Their "Geronimo!" will be heard around the world if and when it happens.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #1835  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:36 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 489
Harry and Meghan are wearing their matching bracelets again!!

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Spotted Wearing Their Matching Bracelets After Secret Visit

There are photos of them both wearing their bracelets after his visit. They both removed while he was on tour. This is so romantic!

They both are seen grinning like crazy after the visit!!
  #1836  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:50 AM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,066
What is a bit marvelling about Harry, is that he seems to start a relationship very "fast" and in a passionate way... Hopefully it will get serious, but as of yet, I'm still wary...
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
  #1837  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:51 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,378
I think Harry is wearing a bracelet with brown and white beads in the above photo.
  #1838  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:37 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3
The bracelets are different, the one of Meghan is blue and the one that takes Prince Harry is white with green stones

All this romance seems like a circus to me. The problem is that clowns do not make us laugh

When romance becomes serious, we will begin to see pictures of her naked with her first husband. Those photos are already being negotiated.

Will we see the Royal Family act to control this? Possibly. But the action will be to destroy this Meghan girl to avoid damage to the Royal Family. Nothing new of course.
  #1839  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:43 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,722
What it all boils down to is that in reality, we know absolutely nothing concrete about this romance or relationship whatsoever. The media is looking under rocks and hard places to delve up anything they can find to write about and with that, putting concrete meanings onto things that most likely aren't even there such as the bracelets and the necklace.

The only thing that has been confirmed and can be taken as fact is that Harry and his people at KP have issued a statement asking people to cease and desist the harassment of people close to Meghan and refrain from derogatory slurs against her. This is the only indication really that there really is a relationship between Harry and Meghan.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #1840  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:45 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3
With the technology of today, it is very easy to hack the Meghan IG or your twitter account and put photos of her naked or porn.
It is not difficult today and I think it pitifully will be the end of this romance.
When it becomes serious, scotland yard will safely act upon orders of the Royal Family to destroy this woman's morals and prevent damage to the Royal Family.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
american archie mountbatten-windsor asia baby names biography birth britain britannia british royal family buckingham palace camilla camilla's family camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness commonwealth countries coronation crown jewels daisy doge of venice dresses duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii family life gemstones george vi gustaf vi adolf hello! henry viii hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume history hypothetical monarchs jack brooksbank japan jewellery kensington palace king edward vii książ castle lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchy mountbatten names nara period plantinum jubilee pless politics portugal prince charles of luxembourg prince harry princess eugenie queen louise solomon j solomon spanish royal family speech sussex taiwan thai royal family united states wales


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×