 |
|

12-05-2016, 05:57 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,137
|
|
The Daily Mail doesn't have photos yet of Harry and Meghan. That's the big one that they are really waiting for. Then they can write their headlines. Until then all the tabloids are scratching around like hens in a farmyard.
|

12-05-2016, 06:43 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,899
|
|
It has been widely reported that Prince Harry's girlfriend Meghan Markle is favourite to play Rebekah Vardy in an upcoming rags to riches movie about the life of football star Jamie. Appearing on Monday's Good Morning Britain, the mother-of-four shared her delight over the surprising possibility.
Rebekah Vardy shares delight over Meghan Markle playing her in husband Jamie's movie
|

12-05-2016, 07:25 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,981
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph
|
Thank goodness for the mail informing me that it's flowers she's carrying not like her shopping trip when people got upset because all they could see was toilet paper.
Where would we be without the daily mail and it's update about " what's Meghan got today ". Another couple of months of this plus a bit of instra in jokes and goodness we might look to Trump for light relief
Call me when she's flashing the ring
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
|

12-05-2016, 07:32 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
The biggest mistake that Meghan could ever make is changing who she is because of who she is dating. I've already seen the change in how she is perceived just in a recent post. "Prince Harry's girlfriend, Meghan Markle....".
I seriously doubt that she's up for a role in a movie just because she's dating Harry.
Like a lot of celebrities and high profile people, Meghan probably has social media sites that are public but also has a private account also. She probably uses the public one to post to people that follow her and the private one to talk to her friends. Harry included.
I know Facebook pages can be public or private and Twitter doesn't seem to be private at all and know nothing really about Instagram. I agree with the statement that social media is the new normal and its not going away anytime soon.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

12-05-2016, 07:35 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,137
|
|
Oh, no-one takes any notice of the DM. Except for its photographs it's just a ridiculous newspaper.
|

12-05-2016, 07:35 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,981
|
|
She can have a private Instagram account and most likely does as well as her fan based one
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
|

12-05-2016, 08:02 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,154
|
|
Twitter allows you to protect your tweets so only the people you allow can see them. So you can definitely still be online via social media but with tighter private settings so everyone can't see everything.
|

12-05-2016, 08:58 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,066
|
|
While I think that it would be better of Meghan protected her social media for any good reason, I see why (even if I don't agree) she is not taking any measure: she is an actress, and not in the same "private person" mode Chelsy or Cressida were, more or less.
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
|

12-05-2016, 09:54 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 108
|
|
What people have to understand is that Meghan is an actress, is acting in a TV series, has fans and thousands of followers. Why should she close her social networks? And she is not posting anything about the relationship, people who are guessing things, even the bananas I didn't find anything too much.
|

12-05-2016, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty91charmed
While I think that it would be better of Meghan protected her social media for any good reason, I see why (even if I don't agree) she is not taking any measure: she is an actress, and not in the same "private person" mode Chelsy or Cressida were, more or less.
|
The more I think about it, the more I'm inclined to think that the social media pages that the public can access is where she'll just post general information, photos and nothing indicative of her private life (well... other than those bananas I heard about). She most likely does have other accounts that has very secure privacy settings and most likely under a pseudonym.
As has been stated before, she's been running these social media accounts and her blog long before she even met Harry and there's really no need to change what she has been doing. All public pages are subject to idiots, flamers and trolls. Hers just attracts more basically because she is an actress in a relatively successful TV series who is dating a man that has been deemed the "most eligible bachelor in the world" by some accounts.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

12-05-2016, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,066
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
The more I think about it, the more I'm inclined to think that the social media pages that the public can access is where she'll just post general information, photos and nothing indicative of her private life (well... other than those bananas I heard about). She most likely does have other accounts that has very secure privacy settings and most likely under a pseudonym.
As has been stated before, she's been running these social media accounts and her blog long before she even met Harry and there's really no need to change what she has been doing. All public pages are subject to idiots, flamers and trolls. Hers just attracts more basically because she is an actress in a relatively successful TV series who is dating a man that has been deemed the "most eligible bachelor in the world" by some accounts.
|
Yes I agree. I think it would be hard for her to avoid being the center of attention as it is unevitable for many reasons. She is the novelty, she has a "interesting" past (at least for the media), and she is famous. That is not something that can be dismissed.
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
|

12-05-2016, 04:13 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
I looked at some of her videos, including an old cooking segment she did on the Today Show, and I just think this young lady is the total package. She can act, has fashion, she can cook, she's an humanitarian and seems like a very down to earth gal. I just hope people try not to reduce her down to an attention seeking social climber. Using and abusing her royal boyfriend and connection to further her own career.
This was done to the young Kate Middleton back in the day.
For some reason people try to break royal girlfriends down to size and put them in the crap box. It's usually other women that's doing this too.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

12-05-2016, 09:28 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 496
|
|
Changing the subject a little here.....
Has Harry met Meghan's mother yet? Last I read, Harry was planning a trip to met them. Does anyone know of any updates on this?
If this relationship is headed towards marriage then Harry needs to speak to her father and her mother!
If he has not met them, why not?
|

12-05-2016, 09:47 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
I sincerely hope that if/when Harry meets Meghan's family (if ever), the press and the public never find out about it. Some things are best left private and IMO this is one of them.
We have had reports that Meghan has met some of Harry's family but that's only been rumors and nothing concrete. Neither Harry or Meghan are talking about their relationship and to be honest, we have no real clue that this relationship is headed anywhere near an altar in the near future.
Until there is an official engagement announcement which signals that they're ready to take on the world as a team, I think this relationship will be under the radar as much as possible. Personally, I think Harry is the type to have a total blast playing cat and mouse games with the media.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

12-05-2016, 10:51 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
|
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4003952/Lovestruck-Prince-Harry-takes-1-700-mile-diversion-Meghan-Markle.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
|

12-05-2016, 10:53 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
|
|
Sorry,Not sure if I did that right...Usually Dailymail writes such crap but by their tone and them waiting for this new scoop I actually believe it.His whole tour has been filler articles on Meghan and I knew as soon as they heard something they would post it.Especially so early in the morning.
|

12-05-2016, 11:19 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
Yeah, I believe it too. It's easy to check too, I guess. He was or wasn't on the flght back to London. I'm guessing tabs are working the hardest to get any scoop, some are camped at certain airports.
|

12-05-2016, 11:32 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
I kind of have mixed feelings on this story. Its very possible that Harry could have bought himself a flight to Toronto and then caught a flight to London on the next day. He has the means to be able to afford to do this very easily.
What makes me wonder though is that if the media is keeping such close tabs on Meghan's whereabouts over the weekend, they would have been hiding in the shadow like hungry coyotes to catch Harry in the act of going into or out of her apartment or wherever Meghan happened to be in Toronto at the time.
If Harry did go to Toronto and then flew to London and the media didn't catch either one of them together or Harry actually in Toronto, this couple is much, much better at the cat and mouse game than I thought.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

12-05-2016, 11:35 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel.10
What people have to understand is that Meghan is an actress, is acting in a TV series, has fans and thousands of followers. Why should she close her social networks? And she is not posting anything about the relationship, people who are guessing things, even the bananas I didn't find anything too much.
|
THIS!! social media is now a requirement for actors now. It's an easy way to create and cultivate an audience for television shows. Heck even Anthony Hopkins has twitter to promote Westworld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
I kind of have mixed feelings on this story. Its very possible that Harry could have bought himself a flight to Toronto and then caught a flight to London on the next day. He has the means to be able to afford to do this very easily.
What makes me wonder though is that if the media is keeping such close tabs on Meghan's whereabouts over the weekend, they would have been hiding in the shadow like hungry coyotes to catch Harry in the act of going into or out of her apartment or wherever Meghan happened to be in Toronto at the time.
If Harry did go to Toronto and then flew to London and the media didn't catch either one of them together or Harry actually in Toronto, this couple is much, much better at the cat and mouse game than I thought. 
|
Wouldn't be the first time they did the ole bait and switch, like when they said he canceled his tickets but was in Toronto. they told the media he would go straight to London, then the media was left behind....perhaps he decided to make a change of plans??
Save
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|