 |
|

11-11-2016, 02:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Posts: 14,178
|
|
I disagree, I think these pictures were planned. There is no need to be seen, let alone go grocery shopping, when you are dating Prince Harry and want to avoid the press.
I think they wanted to take off some steam of the situation, letting the press have some pictures.
|

11-11-2016, 02:19 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Even so, her visiting and going to the store is pretty simple. She can't avoid the press, because she have to go outside to go to work and do other things. There is no reasons why she have to live her life underground now.
People have to relax and let these people live. She's an actress and have to work and go about her business. Catherine was allowed to go about her life, dating and married, Meghan should be afforded the same freedom.
Let's not lock her away in a dungeon. No human relationship can thrive that way.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

11-11-2016, 03:40 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
She's not going to be secluding herself inside or hide away in hotels to avoid the press. Why would she, she's done nothing wrong. She's visiting her boyfriend, and is going to go about her life as normal as possible, which is going to the shop etc when she needs to. I don't get why she shouldn't do this, or act any different than she is doing right now. She and Harry are well aware, that she's going to be pictured by the paps, but she's not going to let that limit her life. IMO that's a good thing, and a promising thing for this relationship.
|

11-11-2016, 05:13 AM
|
 |
Former Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,227
|
|
I'm sorry, but fuzzy side-shots of a woman with dark hair in a hat out shopping on the
say-so of a tabloid newspaper does not, in my mind, constitute it being Meghan Markle...let alone it being Meghan Markle, staying in Kensington Palace and wearing a Remembrance Day poppy, which there are no images of anyway.
The very idea that this was somehow a contrived set-up by the Palace or the pictures were planned is quite beyond my realms of understanding - the mind simply boggles how or why this would have been done.
__________________
JACK
|

11-11-2016, 05:56 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,137
|
|
Someone on another forum regularly posts on photographer Niraj Tanner's Twitter page. She said she asked him what he thought of the photo taken near KP and he replied that it looked to him as if it was taken with an ordinary cell phone. If that's so, either no paps were hanging about or they'd forgotten to bring their cameras.
|

11-11-2016, 06:01 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong
Someone on another forum regularly posts on photographer Niraj Tanner's Twitter page. She said she asked him what he thought of the photo taken near KP and he replied that it looked to him as if it was taken with an ordinary cell phone. If that's so, either no paps were hanging about or they'd forgotten to bring their cameras.
|
Then my theory of this being organized by Harry/Meghan was completely wrong. Nothing new there.  Someone snapping her picture while out and about, and selling it to daily mail is a high possibility.
|

11-11-2016, 07:51 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 143
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze
Then my theory of this being organized by Harry/Meghan was completely wrong. Nothing new there.  Someone snapping her picture while out and about, and selling it to daily mail is a high possibility.
|
Apparently a DM staffer took the pic. The whole foods she went to is right under their headquarters.
|

11-11-2016, 09:35 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 108
|
|
I think the groceries she bought were to prepare a meal for him. She showed in social network she likes to cook. How romantic, to cook for your love! ♥♥♥
|

11-11-2016, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 58
|
|
All matters are that Prince Harry is happy now and in love. I root for him. First of all. Harry is not William and otherwise. I get why he jumped to defend his girlfriend. I think Harry had learned from the past of Windsor divorces and Kate's situation when she was just William's girlfriend. Maybe William regrets how he handled gruesome press when they were harassing poor Kate. Who knows? But one is it for sure. Why is William so fierce regarding his wife and his children privacy? Press is disappointed leniently said because Cambridges release their private photos only on their terms and when to. Do not forget William and Harry were very young when their mother, Diana, died. They hated paparazzi before and after her death they blame press more. Who would forget toddler William saying I hate photographers. Harry was just shy of 13 years old when he walked by his mother's coffin, looked at flowers and his letter to Mummy was visible on the coffin. Such young child. It is for sure damaged he and William, because no matter how old you are, a loss of a parent is terrible always. Harry had troubled childhood, William more for sure. Harry had turbulent adolescent years, and it was evident he was coping with Diana's death very hard, and he was a very angry teenager. Now Harry is a grown up man at 32 but as he said he ought to talk about his mother's death openly and more. So you should not be surprised he released a notice to the press regarding Meghan. Harry has a golden heart, is very impulsive, passionate and sensitive man regarding women and I do not doubt if he would protect his possible future wife and children more fiercely and fervently to UK press than William is doing. I would be very surprised and astonished if Harry didn't do anything with media treating his girlfriend. But he did. Do not wonder why Prince Philip said you have mosquitos; we have the press. And at last point. Most of the hate comments and the responses are coming from Harry's fans, who are just a jealous and bitter women because it won't be them to be Harry's new girlfriend. Press is hungry for more stories as Harry was single and boring, now they have something juicy to chew on and get clicks and readers.
__________________
“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies, said Jojen. The man who never reads lives only one.”
George R. R. Martin: "A Dance With Dragons"
|

11-11-2016, 10:20 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,899
|
|
Remember Kate's 25th birthday? Diana 2.0 Even MPs commented. People feared Kate was in danger from the press. So the actions taken by William and the Palace in the past are helping Harry and Meghan now.
In a report on press regulation, the committee said Kate had been a victim of "persistent harassment".
It said the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) had been "less than impressive" and should have intervened sooner.
BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | Kate Middleton 'hounded', say MPs
|

11-11-2016, 01:49 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,892
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanyT
So she was wearing a poppy just to pick up groceries? 
Looks like someone was expecting to be photographed.
|
Huh  Meghan lives in Canada and here we wear poppies usually for at least the week before rememberance day. Many right after Halloween. I highly doubt her wearing a poppy, even in London, is remotely related to the media.
As for Harry being busy, there is no saying she didn't go to rugby, besides we know she has friends in the uk. I am sure she will take advantage of being there and see some others, and visit her favorite haunts. She isn't and shouldn't have to be hiding away watching Netflix in the place while he works.
|

11-11-2016, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
I think it's safe to create a Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread, no?
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

11-11-2016, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 13,071
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman
I think it's safe to create a Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread, no?
|
There is no need....it's only been four to six months. Let's see what happens.
|

11-11-2016, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,800
|
|
The first thing I thought when I saw the pictures was: 'These damned rain boots all the time''
It felt like a very British thing to do. Dutch people wouldn't be caught dead wearing rain boots when it isn't absolutely necessary.
|

11-11-2016, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,892
|
|
She isn't wearing rain boots as in a cheap pair of wellies for bad weather. She is wearing hunter boots. Yes they are rain boots but they are more worn for style. My sister who spends more money on shoes in a year then I used to make, has several pairs. Would never occur to her to wear then for rainy weather.
|

11-11-2016, 03:37 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 55
|
|
|

11-11-2016, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zonk
There is no need....it's only been four to six months. Let's see what happens.
|
Oh okay. I was just thinking about it.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

11-11-2016, 05:08 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arnhem, Netherlands
Posts: 360
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrinceHarrysWife
|
Let's hope so! I hope this current relationship will end soon. I just don't believe she is the right person for this royal role.
__________________
HRH
|

11-11-2016, 05:14 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: kapaa, United States
Posts: 1,214
|
|
Excuse me but...isn't that a rather rude remark? Why would he marry a blonde only? What is wrong with this young lady? She is a beautiful brunette. Your point?
|

11-11-2016, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,800
|
|
She is gorgeous and Harry is punching above his weight.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|