 |
|

07-25-2017, 04:17 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,983
|
|
why WAS he commenting? Surely he must have experience of turning away a press question..
|

07-25-2017, 04:30 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlowVera
I think Albert was being sympathetic to H&M because of the media instrusion have faced.
|
That is my feeling also.
LaRae
|

07-25-2017, 04:43 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
I don't think there's anything really to make out of Albert's statements at all. It happened.
There is something though that did catch my eye and make me go "hmmmmm...." and wonder if something is up. That being the information that our Rudolph has posted in the Royal Foundation thread.
Should (and notice I said should), an engagement be announced between Harry and Meghan, W&K&H's communications people are going to be over the moon busy with releases, information to be passed out of credible information and generally a lot of work dealing with everything to do with a wedding. I know its been blatantly stated that the focus would be working with the Royal Foundation but they're not going advertise for someone "to handle all sorts of communications dealing with the royal wedding".
Just thoughts and thanks Rudolph!
Prince William, Kate Middleton and Prince Harry hiring new officer
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

07-25-2017, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Ohhhh very interesting.
LaRae
|

07-25-2017, 04:57 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 143
|
|
I'm going to take the job advertisement at face value. Why would they hire a Senior communications officer with extensive pr and charity experience just to deal solely with Harry's hypothetical wedding/engagement? KP's current staff has dealt with a wedding and two births. I doubt they would bring on someone brand new right before an engagement.
|

07-25-2017, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
 Perhaps there's also going to be a lot more to do in connection with the Royal Foundation? It very possibly will have to be renamed The Royal Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and The Duke and Duchess of (fill in the blank) should Meghan join the rank and file.
Dunno. Was just a thought here on my part.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

07-25-2017, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
I don't think they are hiring someone just for Harry and any possible changes to his marital status...very much the killing of two (or more) birds with one stone though.now to see what those birds are!
LaRae
|

07-25-2017, 05:24 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tennessee, United States
Posts: 755
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
why WAS he commenting? Surely he must have experience of turning away a press question..
|
I suspect he was answering because it was a chance to say things he wanted to say about the Princesses Charlene and Grace.
|

07-25-2017, 05:31 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 6,333
|
|
Hiring additional staff because William and Catherine are going to do a lot more? And they will want more help in their causes.
They may also be adding new aspects to the Foundation.
Not everything new is about the possible H and M engagement.
__________________
This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
|

07-25-2017, 05:38 PM
|
 |
Former Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,227
|
|
Lets get back on topic now please. Staff being hired for the Royal Foundation is rather a tenuous subject to be discussing in a thread dedicated to Prince Harry's relationship/s.
__________________
JACK
|

07-25-2017, 05:45 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Posts: 389
|
|
To go back to a potential timeline - I was with the majority of thinking any announcement would be after filming finishes but I did then think, would MM be wanting to honour any PR for the new series, therefore June 2018 ish would be the earliest she would be available for royal announcements?
|

07-25-2017, 06:01 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 143
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TortillaChips
To go back to a potential timeline - I was with the majority of thinking any announcement would be after filming finishes but I did then think, would MM be wanting to honour any PR for the new series, therefore June 2018 ish would be the earliest she would be available for royal announcements?
|
The new season started a few weeks ago and she hasn't done any press for it. Other than that SxSW thing last month.
|

07-25-2017, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 1,236
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7
|
Somehow I feel that it is totally inappropriate for him to comment to this level about Harry and Meghan's relationship. He could have just said "Keep calm and carry on" as an answer to the question and not elaborated any further.
|

07-25-2017, 06:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,871
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle0187
Not really odd of him to comment on the relationship. It appears he doesn’t know much when he says "they seem to have a good relationship" and just giving good advice. Someone who's knows what goes on behind closed doors wouldn't give them advice through people magazine. At least he wasn't asked about the engagement rumors.
|
It seems that it is just me on this one because I still think it feels odd as one royal commenting on another royal's private life seems rather strange since it hasn't really been done before when the royal commenting (in this case, Albert) doesn't belong to the same RF as the royal who is the subject of the discussion (in this case, Harry). If Edward or Charles or someone else from the BRF commented on the relationship, it wouldn't seem strange to me since they are relatives.
People magazine also doesn't seem like much of a reliable magazine to interview to, as you have said.
Although; I guess the counter argument could be that none of us aren't related to the BRF, but since Albert is a royal it's a different matter or at least in my opinion.
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn
*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
|

07-25-2017, 06:23 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,034
|
|
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
|

07-25-2017, 06:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 13,871
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS
|
If you find my post amusing with three 'rofl' faces then, well, that's your opinion, but if you read my post again you'll find that I'm not offended as the word 'offended' would be overreacting. I simply found it strange, that's all. Nothing amusing about finding things strange since we are all allowed to wonder and question things in life.
I find this discussion interesting when people disagree civilly on the matter because I can see the other side of the argument but not when people laugh at other people's opinions and assume things about the poster. As someone who has had a long history of bullying (thankfully I am no longer bullied) I like civil discussions where all posters can treat people with respect - even when they disagree - and not post laughing faces at them.
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn
*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
|

07-25-2017, 07:01 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,886
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TortillaChips
To go back to a potential timeline - I was with the majority of thinking any announcement would be after filming finishes but I did then think, would MM be wanting to honour any PR for the new series, therefore June 2018 ish would be the earliest she would be available for royal announcements?
|
Filming ends in November. Unless they choose to not announce while her show is airing new episodes, she would have no required commitments even December. Any appearances and such in the new year would be directed at the new season if show is renewed.
|

07-25-2017, 08:50 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,297
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duchessrachel
Somehow I feel that it is totally inappropriate for him to comment to this level about Harry and Meghan's relationship. He could have just said "Keep calm and carry on" as an answer to the question and not elaborated any further. 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmirerUS
|
|
I wondered why he made and specific comment, and then I thought back to his courtship and marriage and the marriage of his parents. IMHO I think he was giving Harry a very personal 'heads up'. Princess Grace was beautiful and loved in Monaco and she helped change the face of that tiny state. But her life was no picnic and the scandal rags ragged on her continually.
As to Alberts beloved Charlene? Well, we don't have to go back too far to remember the disaster that was their engagement and the vicious, cruel and unbelievable lies printed about Charlene. Who could forget the mythical "hysterical bride allegedly trying to flee the country leaving Albert at the altar" since this particular scandal was a matter of a few days from the wedding?
That Albert turned the conversation to Charlene definitely confirmed a warning to Harry that as bad as the press can be, it can be an awful lot worse.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

07-25-2017, 09:17 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Although I'm sure Albert meant well I would guess Harry would be the last person that needs to be told how bad the press can be.
LaRae
|

07-25-2017, 09:30 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess
It seems that it is just me on this one because I still think it feels odd as one royal commenting on another royal's private life seems rather strange since it hasn't really been done before when the royal commenting (in this case, Albert) doesn't belong to the same RF as the royal who is the subject of the discussion (in this case, Harry). If Edward or Charles or someone else from the BRF commented on the relationship, it wouldn't seem strange to me since they are relatives.
|
I think typically members of a royal family aren't asked their opinions on members of other royal families - at least not without context. I mean, no one's going around asking Victoria of Sweden what she thinks about Frederik of Denmark, unless they're doing something together.
This interview is odd in and of itself not simply for Albert's comments, but because he was asked his thoughts on Harry and Meghan in the first place. And of course the reason that happened is because unlike most other royal families, Monaco is one that can relate to this relationship - Albert's mother was an American film star, so Albert presumably has some insight that Victoria or Frederik might not have.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|