Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017

[Dman]

It's being said this romance is true. If so, I hope everyone will give him the space he needs.

[Nice Nofret]

.. I'm still not convinced: she may have said, ' luckiest girl in the world' - but in another context - the only thing, which is clear in the article is, that she is promoting herself and a range of clothing ...

[Curryong]

The Guardian examines, in the light of the last few days, 'the myth of royal purity.'

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...in-race-royals

[Biri]

Originally Posted by royal rob

I don't think anyone is saying 35 is to old it's the 2 year dating 12 months engagement then the 12-18 months settling in to royal life. And IVF doesn't work for everyone check the stats.

Even if all this stuff were true and it in fact would end in a wedding, she could become pregnant on a post-wedding night, it happens.
Prince Carl-Philipp & Princess Sofia of Sweden didn't wait.

[Curryong]

Maybe they won't wait two years, just get engaged in another six months and married three or four months after that. Or it might be a romance that's not for the longterm.

[Empress Merel]

Some insight.

US Weekly reports Prince Harry secretly visited Meghan Markle in Toronto Halloween weekend contrary to reports that he cancelled the trip

She is usually right about pretty much all rumors.

[Curryong]

Wow. Thank you Empress. Some insight indeed. Perhaps more serious than I thought. I have wondered whether Harry got tremendously peeved with the way Cressida Bonas was treated online by many.

[Pranter]

Much ado about nothing...more media fabrication.


LaRae

[Curryong]

Well, if it's real and serious or made-up nonsense, time will tell, I suppose.

[Pranter]

The media rarely gets it right...I've lost count of all the relationships Harry has supposedly had, according to the media.



LaRae

[Blog Real]

Don't you think that if he was faking Meghan Markle has reportedly been public deny?

[Skippyboo]

Why would she say anything? Look at all the free publicity she is getting. Most of us never heard of her until Sunday. If they aren't together, things will die off in time especially if they aren't pictured together in the near future.


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community

[michelle0187]

The pictures that are being painted every hour since Sunday, is sufficient enough. If she says she's the luckiest girl in the world, posts two bananas spooning on ig and went out with him 2 days ago in Toronto then it's automatically heading towards a wedding early 2017 speculation . If it's possible to become serious then it is or will be. Nothing but a tweet sighting in toronto, interviews and front cover pages, makes it official to many. tabloid speculation or manipulation is all the confirmation that's needed for the majority of fans. It's getting more credible by the day and no amount of spotted inaccuracies for each article won't let this die down.

[Duc_et_Pair]

If Miss Markle indeed becomes "Princess Meghan" and Her Royal Highness, the celebrification of the royal family is complete and the already completely blurred line between royalty, celebrity, wannabes and parasites (Sarah) is complete.

The best recipe for inner erosion of the institution of the monarchy. Unwed moms, the fitness dude, an underwear model, a divorced TV-anchor and now a Z-list celebbie, does not matter: the doors of Europe's royal palaces sway wide open. No any conditions required to become a royal.

For a dishwasher at Kentucky Fried Chicken they apply more conditions. This oldfashioned dude here hopes that Prince Henry indeed will engage with a nice lady with a respected and dignified background.

[Hendrik-Jan77]

Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair

If Miss Markle indeed becomes "Princess Meghan" and Her Royal Highness, the celebrification of the royal family is complete and the already completely blurred line between royalty, celebrity, wannabes and parasites (Sarah) is complete.

The best recipe for inner erosion of the institution of the monarchy. Unwed moms, the fitness dude, an underwear model, a divorced TV-anchor and now a Z-list celebbie, does not matter: the doors of Europe's royal palaces sway wide open. No any conditions required to become a royal.

For a dishwasher at Kentucky Fried Chicken they apply more conditions. This oldfashioned dude here hopes that Prince Henry indeed will engage with a nice lady with a respected and dignified background.

I could not agree more! I love Prince William's choice for a bride more by the day. I had my doubts about Catherine in the time before their engagement but I know think she is a perfect choice for a future queen. I wish the 'Cressida days' were back...

[Countessmeout]

wow sorry do you expect them to marry virginal beauties too? Yes, guess what, their spouses are going to have history, every one foes. Hat careers they have chosen, is no reflection of their upbringing or class. Yes I mean who cares Letizia has come from a good family, is well educated and had a successful career. She should be ostracized for having a got,e marriage. And imagine a man starting several successful businesses, I mean that is do embarrassing. Couldn't Victoria have we'd some rich aristocrat who doesn't have to work. We all sweet his well the last time a British Royal was held yo the standards of marry into the aristocracy went, the royal family barely survived. Better Harry actually marry someone he loves, and who actually knows herself, then someone with nothing more than a pedigree.

[Fürstin Taxis]

Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair

If Miss Markle indeed becomes "Princess Meghan" and Her Royal Highness, the celebrification of the royal family is complete and the already completely blurred line between royalty, celebrity, wannabes and parasites (Sarah) is complete.

The best recipe for inner erosion of the institution of the monarchy. Unwed moms, the fitness dude, an underwear model, a divorced TV-anchor and now a Z-list celebbie, does not matter: the doors of Europe's royal palaces sway wide open. No any conditions required to become a royal.

For a dishwasher at Kentucky Fried Chicken they apply more conditions. This oldfashioned dude here hopes that Prince Henry indeed will engage with a nice lady with a respected and dignified background.

Write a letter to Buckingham Palace with a list of women he should consider marrying.


But seriously, he didn't behaved always dignified, but somehow Meghan is the worst. A royal crest seems to blind some people.

[Countessmeout]

Originally Posted by Hendrik-Jan77

I could not agree more! I love Prince William's choice for a bride more by the day. I had my doubts about Catherine in the time before their engagement but I know think she is a perfect choice for a future queen. I wish the 'Cressida days' were back...

The Cressida days back? Under duc standards, neither Kate nor cress would make the cut. Cress perhaps had enough pedigree, but she is a z list celebrity far more than Meghan. Late comes from a middle class background, no dignified pedigree, no exceptional education or work.

It's a laugh Cressida is a step up. On one hand we have Cressida, a dancer turned actress without any real career or education. Then we have Meghan who has a degree, a career, and works for two major humanitarian groups. The only thing Cressida has a leg up on is her blue blood from her mother.

Hopefully he goes find someone like Kate. While a ad boring and one could hope she worked publically more, she is smart, seems invested in her work when she does it, and her and William are happy. Maybe one good side of harr marring later, his wife will have had a chance at a career and some life experience, before she has taken the Royal path. It may be easier to carve out her path. It took Kate a year to choose what charities she looked to work with. Perhaps do done with a bit more work and life experience perhaps like Meghan who have volunteered before, will have a pan easier time finding thrift path.

[Empress Merel]

Wow, some people really are butthurt over Meghan. Yes, she's a divorcee but it's not as if the BRF has set the standard for succesfull marriages or Harry has such a clean sheet as far as reputation goes. And yes, she is older but that does not mean she cannot have children. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking Meghan would be some sort of tragedy.

She does loads of charity work, has earned her own money for years and thus is capable of supporting herself, holds a degree and has worked with the UN. She actually ticks more boxes than Kate ever did.

Looks like Harry is doing quite well for himself here.

[michelle0187]

Originally Posted by Duc_et_Pair

If Miss Markle indeed becomes "Princess Meghan" and Her Royal Highness, the celebrification of the royal family is complete and the already completely blurred line between royalty, celebrity, wannabes and parasites (Sarah) is complete.

The best recipe for inner erosion of the institution of the monarchy. Unwed moms, the fitness dude, an underwear model, a divorced TV-anchor and now a Z-list celebbie, does not matter: the doors of Europe's royal palaces sway wide open. No any conditions required to become a royal.

For a dishwasher at Kentucky Fried Chicken they apply more conditions. This oldfashioned dude here hopes that Prince Henry indeed will engage with a nice lady with a respected and dignified background.

I was thinking the same thing when I read one of daily mail articles. If she makes it to Westminster abbey, one day will officially be seen as a family of titled celebrities once hm and doe are gone

Originally Posted by Hendrik-Jan77

I could not agree more! I love Prince William's choice for a bride more by the day. I had my doubts about Catherine in the time before their engagement but I know think she is a perfect choice for a future queen. I wish the 'Cressida days' were back...

The only thing I can say for cress is that she never waited 24 hours to advertise her relationship and bask in the attention in the early stages.