Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017 - Page 237

MaiaMia_53 · #**4721** 03-15-2017, 03:11 AM

The photos on the balcony are being termed 'steamy,' but one person's 'steamy' may be another person's "What's all the fuss about?"

Quote:

Originally Posted by hel

If they're at all clever, they'll use the distraction of Pippa's wedding as an opportunity to slip away for a long weekend while all the press are busy filing copy about what Catherine wears to the wedding.

After all, that's the May 24 weekend here, so Meghan will have a three day weekend.

That sounds like a very good idea.

Osipi · #**4722** 03-15-2017, 05:15 AM

Ahhh... now that I've had a good, long winter's nap and have read through the many intelligent posts here, I just may scroll back and take a look at the beach photos of Harry and Meghan. It seems to me that right now, there's been a line drawn between the sea photos and the balcony photos and the balcony photos (aka "steamy" photos) have not yet made the rounds.

As time passed, we have gotten to know Meghan quite a bit better and to be honest, the more I read about her, her lifestyle and her career, the more the edges of Harry and the edges of Meghan seem to fit together snugly as pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. I seriously don't think either of them pay any attention to the stories and far fetched, inventive pieces of opinion that come out about them and in a way, that's good because that is going to happen until their happy golden years if they become a royal team for the BRF. This is a couple that have withstood so far everything that has been thrown at them from making a long distance relationship work to the silly, inane and insensitive claptrap that is the trademark of the tabloids. Harry was quick on the draw at the onset with what was, as I like to think of it, a levelheaded, precise "ginger warning" of what will not be tolerated and a public proclamation doesn't get much better than that.

Its been interesting times to sit back and watch this happy couple develop into a loving couple and who knows what that loving couple will develop into? Both individuals have a lot going for them in their own right and from all appearances, together as a couple, they'll be dynamic in whatever they choose to take on together. Time will tell and that's something we have a lot of. Time.

ETA: Love the pictures. One very good looking couple enjoying themselves.

Osipi · #**4723** 03-15-2017, 08:45 AM

There are so many glaring mistakes in that article that I seriously wonder what the author was smoking when it was written.

1. Queen Elizabeth is Her Majesty not Her Royal Highness.

2. In the UK, there is no Mother's Day. Its Mothering Sunday and it will be celebrated this year on May 26th.

3. Pippa Middleton's wedding date is May 20th which is six days before Mothering Sunday so the purpose of getting the Queen's "green light" before Pippa's wedding is a bunch of invented nonsense.

Sheeesh... these people need some serious fact checking on their articles before they go to print.

Curryong · #**4724** 03-15-2017, 09:01 AM

Harry with Meghan and mates from the Skippy wedding, on the beach. From the article in the magazine.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68bcadWkAAtFc4.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68aBO2XAAEs8AJ.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68SDS1WYAEXlbJ.jpg

lilacmagnolia · #**4725** 03-15-2017, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osipi

There are so many glaring mistakes in that article that I seriously wonder what the author was smoking when it was written.

1. Queen Elizabeth is Her Majesty not Her Royal Highness.

2. In the UK, there is no Mother's Day. Its Mothering Sunday and it will be celebrated this year on May 26th.

3. Pippa Middleton's wedding date is May 20th which is six days before Mothering Sunday so the purpose of getting the Queen's "green light" before Pippa's wedding is a bunch of invented nonsense.

Sheeesh... these people need some serious fact checking on their articles before they go to print.

Not saying I believe the article but Mothering Sunday is March 26th of 2017 not May.

Ugh she is so fit it's nauseating,They look great but some are already claiming Photoshop...How long can they really go on that,these are new pictures! BTW,looks like she knows his mates pretty well and they like her

!

Osipi · #**4726** 03-15-2017, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

Not saying I believe the article but Mothering Sunday is March 26th of 2017 not May.

Oh duh! My foggy, foggy, caffeine deprived brain has done me in once again. Thanks much for the correction. (And no... I wasn't smoking the same stuff the author of the article was)

Still, I do think that the article was a desperate attempt to pull on threads of a sweater that doesn't even exist in order to make a "story". No one would really have a clue of Harry's plans to visit his Granny especially the media.

jacqui24 · #**4727** 03-15-2017, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

Ugh she is so fit it's nauseating,They look great but some are already claiming Photoshop...How long can they really go on that,these are new pictures! BTW,looks like she knows his mates pretty well and they like her

!

It seems that his buddies are happy to see them. His buddies are laughing and grinning in that pic of him hugging Meghan. And the guy that's next to them in the pic of Meghan kissing him is was also grinning from ear to ear.

Alisa · #**4728** 03-15-2017, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hel

If they're at all clever, they'll use the distraction of Pippa's wedding as an opportunity to slip away for a long weekend while all the press are busy filing copy about what Catherine wears to the wedding.

After all, that's the May 24 weekend here, so Meghan will have a three day weekend.

That would be smart! Harry can dodge Pippa's wedding or just attend the ceremony and go off on a romantic rendezvous with Meghan!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Curryong

Harry with Meghan and mates from the Skippy wedding, on the beach. From the article in the magazine.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68bcadWkAAtFc4.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68aBO2XAAEs8AJ.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C68SDS1WYAEXlbJ.jpg

Love the pics! You would think they're the ones that just got married. In the first pics with Harry's mates they look more "loved up " than the newly weds!

AlowVera · #**4729** 03-15-2017, 10:53 AM

They look like a normal happy couple!

Osipi · #**4730** 03-15-2017, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alisa

That would be smart! Harry can dodge Pippa's wedding or just attend the ceremony and go off on a romantic rendezvous with Meghan!

Of course this is just assuming that Harry is even invited to Pippa's wedding which is a really humungous IF at this time. Personally, I don't see any reason why he would be invited to a small intimate wedding for family and friends of the couple.

Cocoasneeze · #**4731** 03-15-2017, 10:58 AM

These are really cute pictures. Harry's friends seem to like Meghan, she's a really charming personality.

Moonmaiden23 · #**4732** 03-15-2017, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Nimue

I think it's nice that Harry finally has a nice, steady girlfriend.

Same here. Maybe I am projecting, but there seemed to be a palpable loneliness about him in the past.

If he's truly found who he wants to share a life with, good for him.

AlowVera · #**4733** 03-15-2017, 11:07 AM

Detractors tried to claim that his friends do not approve.......they seem fine to me.

Osipi · #**4734** 03-15-2017, 11:18 AM

The main thing to remember is that those that are Harry's closest friends and in his circle of trust do not talk. Those detractors are blowing smoke from a fire that doesn't exist. They have no more clue of what Harry's friends "think" any more than we do.

Pranter · #**4735** 03-15-2017, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miss whirley

You also have to wonder how they define steamy. As we've learned in the last 24 hrs the British tabloids consider high-fives to be akin to the throes of passion.

HA! Quite right! LOL

LaRae

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23

Same here. Maybe I am projecting, but there seemed to be a palpable loneliness about him in the past.

If he's truly found who he wants to share a life with, good for him.

Yes I agree. If he's found 'the one' very happy for him.

LaRae

Curryong · #**4736** 03-15-2017, 11:31 AM

The British media won't be able to show these photos, steamy, loving (which I think they are) or not. They are banned from reproducing them in UK papers so they go on the Internet for people to look at instead. There's an article in The Sun complaining about it.

Lady Marmalade · #**4737** 03-15-2017, 01:08 PM

I hope in this case the British media does what they do best. He is a royal prince and while it is one thing for William to marry Kate - everything was great about the background except the uncle and even he has been quiet - Kate fits in well, she is turning out to be major asset. This one....too modern Hollywood....to not one of them, too loud with her personal views. The vulgarity of her tv show scenes.... the nobility in Britain is something respect as it keeps the wannabes like David and Victoria out, the thirsty ones. I cannot imagine this one smiling perky beside her man. She is thirsty for the fame of it all.

miss whirley · #**4738** 03-15-2017, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade

I hope in this case the British media does what they do best. He is a royal prince and while it is one thing for William to marry Kate - everything was great about the background except the uncle and even he has been quiet - Kate fits in well, she is turning out to be major asset. This one....too modern Hollywood....to not one of them, too loud with her personal views. The vulgarity of her tv show scenes.... the nobility in Britain is something respect as it keeps the wannabes like David and Victoria out, the thirsty ones. I cannot imagine this one smiling perky beside her man. She is thirsty for the fame of it all.

Well, a lot of the British blue bloods have desperately tried to have Hollywood careers, some successful some not. I can't see the nobility freezing her out because of that.

I do agree that she's currently too loud in her views compared to how she'll have to behave as Princess Harry. But one would hope she has enough self-control to censor herself when necessary.

Cocoasneeze · #**4739** 03-15-2017, 01:33 PM

After her relationship with Harry became public, what things has she been loud about? I don't remember one political comment from her after last October/November.

jacqui24 · #**4740** 03-15-2017, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miss whirley

Well, a lot of the British blue bloods have desperately tried to have Hollywood careers, some successful some not. I can't see the nobility freezing her out because of that.

I do agree that she's currently too loud in her views compared to how she'll have to behave as Princess Harry. But one would hope she has enough self-control to censor herself when necessary.

What has she been loud about other than saying Donald Trump makes misogynistic comments? The only reason that'd be politically related is because he was running for office. In what society is calling out misogynistic comments too political?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade

I hope in this case the British media does what they do best. He is a royal prince and while it is one thing for William to marry Kate - everything was great about the background except the uncle and even he has been quiet - Kate fits in well, she is turning out to be major asset. This one....too modern Hollywood....to not one of them, too loud with her personal views. The vulgarity of her tv show scenes.... the nobility in Britain is something respect as it keeps the wannabes like David and Victoria out, the thirsty ones. I cannot imagine this one smiling perky beside her man. She is thirsty for the fame of it all.

Vulgarity? Seriously? We've seen Harry's crown jewels and heard his father saying he wants to be his mistress' tampon among other things, I think this family should be ok with acting at this point.