Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017 - Page 233

Dman · #**4641** 03-13-2017, 06:27 PM

I think everyone should put those unseen pictures down and not publish them. Pictures of them attending the wedding is one thing, but private pics will truly cross the line.

Osipi · #**4642** 03-13-2017, 06:31 PM

Do we even know where the pictures were taken? Perhaps they're among some of the many photos that were taken at the recent wedding. We don't know it was any kind of an intrusion at all.

Personally, I have better things to do than worry about a photo that shows Harry and Meghan being loving to each other. Its normal, everyday behavior between couples in love and isn't earth shattering news.

American Observer7 · #**4643** 03-13-2017, 06:32 PM

I just wish Harry would propose already so we can move on to other subjects about them.

And Meghan is an actress. Actresses and actors do love making scenes. It's not rocket science or something earth shattering. Let it go. It's her job.

Curryong · #**4644** 03-13-2017, 06:40 PM

Right, I'll just text him and tell him we want a proposal by the end of next week

...Actually, a few more pics from the wedding or having fun in the sea off Jamaica would be nice.

lilacmagnolia · #**4645** 03-13-2017, 07:02 PM

Personally I will watch just to hear what the jealous PH fangirls will say next after saying the photos never existed in the first place...

Curryong · #**4646** 03-13-2017, 07:32 PM

I actually don't think these women/girls are fans of Harry's in any way, shape or form. If you've followed a public figure for some time and like them, you hopefully just want them to be happy and you trust their judgement.

After all Harry knows Meghan, knows her character and personality and ability to make him happy or not. The people online in Tumblrs and elsewhere, giving this man gratuitous advice while at the same time saying how stupid he is for not bowing to them and getting rid of Meghan, seem to be living some sort of fantasy of their own but I don't think it's a romantic one.

Osipi · #**4647** 03-13-2017, 07:47 PM

All the world is a stage and it sure seems like there's a big influx of script writer wannabees out there. Sad way to spend one's life if you ask me. I have enough to deal with managing my own life without thinking I can run someone else's or believe I know what is best for someone I don't even know and probably never will.

I do, however, love a good romance and from where I'm sitting, it looks like Harry just may have met someone that bodes for a promising future together.

USRoyalWatcher · #**4648** 03-13-2017, 08:24 PM

It seems that the only way to make this madness stop is either an engagement or a break up. The press was very rude to Camilla and Kate, but the negative press stopped when the engagements were announced. Does that ring true to everyone else?

Alisa · #**4649** 03-13-2017, 08:34 PM

I think so

lilacmagnolia · #**4650** 03-13-2017, 08:35 PM

The pictures were pulled apparently,that was quick!

Curryong · #**4651** 03-13-2017, 08:35 PM

Yes, the Press stopped their sniping then, USRoyalWatcher, but it's really people on social media who are behaving in a disgustingly nasty way with Meghan. Believe it or not, the tabloids have actually not been quite so bad.

When Camilla and Charles became engaged Twitter was still newish. There is still some resentment towards Camilla but it doesn't rise to great heights on social media, except on DM clickbait lines.

There is still some sniping of Kate on Tumblrs etc and really I don't know how you stop it. I guess you don't go on sites that spread poison. I have to say that if what has happened to Meghan online since November is an example of how some people are going to react in the future to any potential wife of a popular prince, God help us!

Iluvbertie · #**4652** 03-13-2017, 08:51 PM

If the current press coverage is not 'rude' to Kate and Camilla then it really was bed beforehand. I don't think it has stopped at all. The press are quite critical - particularly of Kate and it has been ramping up over recent years, imo, rather than toning down.

AlowVera · #**4653** 03-13-2017, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

Personally I will watch just to hear what the jealous PH fangirls will say next after saying the photos never existed in the first place...

Too many people have purported to see them for that to happen. I think they exist and I imagine if ET decided not to show them perhaps they might get an exclusive since they are not bound by English law.

Curryong · #**4654** 03-13-2017, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iluvbertie

If the current press coverage is not 'rude' to Kate and Camilla then it really was bed beforehand. I don't think it has stopped at all. The press are quite critical - particularly of Kate and it has been ramping up over recent years, imo, rather than toning down.

The thing is though that although sniping of royals in the tabloids is not at all admirable it doesn't reach the heights of what is said about some royals and private citizens on social media, especially Tumblr, Twitter.

The tabloids, dreadful though they are, are bound by certain standards and they can be sued for libel.

That isn't the case with some foreign-based internet websites, and what has been said online about Meghan (and Harry) in the last three months would be considered disgraceful by any fair-minded observer.

After all, Meghan is still a private citizen, and what has been thrown at her, especially concerning her moral character, is far worse than anything I've read in the Press about Kate or even Camilla in the years before she married Charles.

American Observer7 · #**4655** 03-13-2017, 09:37 PM

If an engagement happens, I hope does an interview just to put all the negative comments from all these people in their places.

What he needs to say is " You all need to mind your own business. This is my life not yours and I am going to do exactly what I want to do." (And that's me being nice)

royal rob · #**4656** 03-13-2017, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by USRoyalWatcher

It seems that the only way to make this madness stop is either an engagement or a break up. The press was very rude to Camilla and Kate, but the negative press stopped when the engagements were announced. Does that ring true to everyone else?

Well either of those things will happen eventually !!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Observer7

If an engagement happens, I hope does an interview just to put all the negative comments from all these people in their places.

What he needs to say is " You all need to mind your own business. This is my life not yours and I am going to do exactly what I want to do." (And that's me being nice)

That is not the way the BRF work that's what celebrities do.

I'm not looking or trolling for articles about Meghan so haven't read anything very nasty, racist etc etc
I recommend it

Curryong · #**4657** 03-13-2017, 10:14 PM

There are some Harrycentric and other royal sites that I have been posting on for years, since they started, royal rob, that have gone absolutely mad in the last few months. Before, they had posters whom I regarded as reasonably sane. No longer. Some have gone feral. So it's not exactly trolling.

XeniaCasaraghi · #**4658** 03-13-2017, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by royal rob

I hope they live together for at least 6 months before they announce a engagement. Grabbing a few days here and there is very romantic but doesn't prepare you for being together all the time

I think all the post 80s relationships should follow the Edward and Sophie example of dating for almost a decade before an engagement. But seeing as how Harry and Megan are so late to the game, I'd say give it 3 years.

Curryong · #**4659** 03-13-2017, 10:42 PM

I don't know that it was by Sophie's wish that her and Edward's dating period was so lengthy. I have read that she told a friend after she married that Edward felt the pressure. Every time someone would inquire as to when they were to marry she said he pulled away afterwards.

Meghan will be 36 this August. If they wait she will be within hailing distance of forty when they marry. As fertility slips in the late thirties, if they hope for a family of at least two, she and Harry will be marrying earlier than that.

DeeT · #**4660** 03-13-2017, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Observer7

If an engagement happens, I hope does an interview just to put all the negative comments from all these people in their places.

What he needs to say is " You all need to mind your own business. This is my life not yours and I am going to do exactly what I want to do." (And that's me being nice)

Perhaps not in those exact words, however, in the November statement, Harry did make a comment referencing that it was his and Meghan's life. Harry's father, heir to the throne, Prince Charles made Camilla his non-negotiable, despite his position, family, public sentiment at the time etc. Perhaps Harry will take a page from his father's example with how to deal with naysayers.