 |
|

02-22-2017, 10:16 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberG
So, nobody see him asking Chelsey to give him another chance? She was my favorite, most beatiful smile, pretty, best education, good and tight family...
|
I was rooting for Harry and Chelsea also but it takes two to tango and it seems they decided not to continue their romantic relationship but they remain friends.
Judging by his public serious girlfriends he seems to like beautiful, intelligent and determined women who have their own careers and lives.
|

02-22-2017, 04:54 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 500
|
|
Harry is going to find it hard when Meghan has to go back to work in April. He has probably gotten used to her being around everyday.
|

02-22-2017, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7
Harry is going to find it hard Meghan has to go back to work in April. He has probably gotten used to her being around everyday.
|
We don't know for sure if they've been together all this time or not. Nobody's talking.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

02-22-2017, 06:37 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,342
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princesslily
I'm not surprised either.
IMO This relationship seems more physical to me. They only really started getting to know each other properly since late December. The previous times were just short visits since June. Not enough time to get to know each other. Big mistake, but just like Royal Reporter, I wouldn't be surprised if Harry proposes soon. He really wants to settle down asap.
|
You have absolutely no way of proving that statement whatsoever. I assume you are basing it on what little we have seen of it in the papers and that has been precious little, and yet you believe it's only "physical".
I don't understand the insistence of bringing Harry's relationship down to it's lowest possible denominator. "Physical" is just code for sex and nothing else any yet the erratic demands of both his and her positions woud actually lead one to expect that they have been physically apart more than together and staying in contact using text, email and skype.
We don't know if they are conducting an old-fashioned romance with love letters (or emails) or what. I think everyone deserves a little romance in their life . . . and I'm not talking about sex! However did our parents and grandparents manage to sustain a relationship without shacking up first? Many spent their engagements and early marriages parted by war, and yet their relationships survived.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

02-22-2017, 07:08 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 500
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
We don't know for sure if they've been together all this time or not. Nobody's talking.
|
Well then if they've been together this entire time?
|

02-22-2017, 09:43 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West London, United Kingdom
Posts: 182
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG
You have absolutely no way of proving that statement whatsoever. I assume you are basing it on what little we have seen of it in the papers and that has been precious little, and yet you believe it's only "physical".
I don't understand the insistence of bringing Harry's relationship down to it's lowest possible denominator. "Physical" is just code for sex and nothing else any yet the erratic demands of both his and her positions woud actually lead one to expect that they have been physically apart more than together and staying in contact using text, email and skype.
We don't know if they are conducting an old-fashioned romance with love letters (or emails) or what. I think everyone deserves a little romance in their life . . . and I'm not talking about sex! However did our parents and grandparents manage to sustain a relationship without shacking up first? Many spent their engagements and early marriages parted by war, and yet their relationships survived.
|
I wasn't talking about sex either. You don't marry someone just because you're physically attracted to them. Looks fade. Obviously, it takes a lot more like others have said for a lasting marriage. That is why I said it was crazy to get engaged so soon, but this isn't my choice. It's just a discussion.
Comparing it to elder generations, well this isn't just a normal marriage. This marriage is also joining a public firm with many responsibilities and requires each member to behave a certain way, including keeping your political opinions to yourself. Can an outspoken and opinionated person fit in?
Harry won't have any problem with Meghan not wanting to be in the limelight.
IMO this union will end badly. [edit]
I've decided not to post on this topic anymore. I feel Harry has made his choice and the relationship is too intense for common sense.
|

02-22-2017, 10:53 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Green Bay, United States
Posts: 617
|
|
I've been following this discussion and find some of the points of view rather off beat. Harry and Meghan are both in their 30's and both have had previous romances. They are not immature kids. You do not need a long time to know if you are suited to each other. You do need to have an adult attitude. I met my husband on Saturday, got engaged on Monday and married 3 months latter. Yes, that was 57 years ago and we are still going strong. We got married knowing we did not know everything about the other, but we did know that we could talk things out and resolve issues as they came up. We were the same religion, both wanted a family and had good examples to follow. When I met him I felt like I came home. I had dated a lot and had been engaged before. The night I met him we talked all night. I don't know Harry or Meghan, and I don't know if they have that kind of connection, but it is possible. I understand that his being royal and their having to live that life changes the picture, but I hope they both have that adult attitude. I wish them well no matter what their decision is.
|

02-23-2017, 12:18 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,254
|
|
Unfortunately, it seems to me that Meghan being an actress looms very large with people who dislike her. Meghan goes out to buy groceries --oh that's a pap walk because it was near DM offices, she doesn't wear gloves when buying flowers-- well obviously she has a contract with a jewellery site so she's trying to flog their rings while having her bare hands photographed holding the flowers.
Actress automatically = self publicist, of course!
She dared to post bananas and an elephant on The Tig when the story broke of the romance--what a publicity hound, (actually, the people commenting on this used another worse expression). Meghan knows Piers Morgan, -- well, he's the lowest of the low isn't he and hated, so , you're known by the company you keep aren't you, and she must have been angling for an article. Meghan knows administrators of Soho House--she must have been a hostess there. All without proof but it just goes on and on and on.
If she was really what many have accused her of she would have been out a hundred times more when in London getting her photo taken every day. Oh but she's hiding at Nott Cott.
What's she doing there 24/7, they ask. Enticing our prince into her web with her sinister magical powers, obviously. Poor boy. Well actually, many can't make out whether Harry's 'too dumb' to see her manipulative ways but most believe it's her drawing him in like some fish on a hook!
If she was a gold digger she would have taken money from her husband. No, say the Twitter crowd, her exes are just waiting to spill the beans for the right money. All this has about as much veracity as the assertions that there are dozens of nude photos of Meghan in raunchy poses about to be released on the Internet. They haven't arrived yet after weeks and weeks and IMO aren't likely to because they just don't exist.
In fact a lot of what has been said about Meghan has less to do with racism and a lot to do with dislike of her for whatever perceived reason and the sheer nastiness that flows from that conclusion.
|

02-23-2017, 03:32 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,092
|
|
I think people have always had WAY too many expectations of who Harry would marry. I think they expected a Nobel Prizewinner with UN diplomatic back history and a multi-million dollar business that spans nations.
Oh, and she has to have a title with a middle class background and is a virgin, or close to it.
Just way too many expectations.
I think Meg will be just fine as a consort to Harry and it's not like she is at all going to be a bad influence. At least she knows how to keep her relationship out of her social media work and I admire how she goes for what she wants.
|

03-03-2017, 10:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,783
|
|
The moderators have decided to reopen this thread, with the following points to be kept at the forefront of thought when posting:
1) We will not tolerate any even slightly racist remark.
2) Likewise, we will not tolerate any accusations of calling other posters racist.
3) ANY piece of information/detail/news MUST be accompanied by a source, or it will be deleted. "My friend in London said..." does not count.
4) Tumblr is not a valid source - we would prefer if you all refrain from discussing matters from Tumblr here.
5) And - vitally - you are all to treat each other with the respect you would like to receive yourself. Respect that there are posters who like Meghan, there are posters who don't, and there are posters who are neutral. Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Any posts that do not follow the above instructions will be removed without notice by the moderating team. Should multiple instances of breaking these instructions occur, members will face a suspension of their posting privileges.
|

03-03-2017, 10:27 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,254
|
|
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry attend friend's wedding* | Daily Mail Online
Great to see some new photos of the couple, and in the Jamaican sunshine no less. The whole gang's there and no doubt there will be a lot of celebrating. An old friend's holiday in a sunny locale. A great way to debut the relationship further for Harry and Meghan.
|

03-03-2017, 10:55 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
|
|
Good for them!!
|

03-03-2017, 11:43 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
There we have it folks. Harry and Meghan together at a best friend's wedding. Its so nice that they can meet up for something like this in a beautiful, sunny location to celebrate the marriage of friends. What I really liked and how it showed the closeness between friends is that Harry was listed in the wedding program as just being "Harry Wales". Tells me that titles and status didn't matter one bit for this occasion.
Harry and Meghan do make a good looking couple together and look extremely happy to be in each other's company.
I expect that now they're ready to be out and about in public together and that tells me that the times alone have paid off for the two of them and they're ready to walk together no matter where the road takes them.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

03-04-2017, 12:27 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,906
|
|
I wouldn't call taking her to a private wedding being out and about just yet. It certainly is a step in the right direction. But I wouldn't be expecting her suddenly attending public events with Harry. The wedding is along the lines of lunch out with friends in London or her staying at the palace, something intended to be private.
But great to see them out enjoying. I am sure Harry enjoyed introducing her to friends she hasn't met yet. And no more jokes about what bridesmaid he will hit on would be a perk.
|

03-04-2017, 12:28 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
There's lots of pics out there. Nice to see them having a great time at the wedding.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

03-04-2017, 12:51 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Jackonsville, United States
Posts: 21
|
|
They look so happy together! I hope they enjoy this trip and their time with each other.
|

03-04-2017, 12:57 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nashville, United States
Posts: 627
|
|
Well I just saw the latest pics and as I suspected, these two shine in candid shots. The hand holding, Meghan smiling with her arm around Harry...they certainly look like a couple falling in love and not afraid to show it. Really nice to see.
|

03-04-2017, 01:01 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
Nice to see all these pictures. They look great together! I suspect there will be more from this trip.
|

03-04-2017, 02:03 AM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 129
|
|
So good to finally see Harry look so relaxed and happy. I hope the future is one that makes him happy, he deserves, like all the rest of us to be happy.
It must be awful to have the world rating your relationships and putting in their opinions on who is suitable for you and who isn't. So damn lucky we don't have a forum/twitter/instagram/facebook to decide who we can marry!!!!
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|