Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017

[Curryong]

Hi Ninavouchy, and welcome.
I wasn't on this forum fifteen years ago, unfortunately. However, I have been interested in astrology, tarot etc and have drawn up charts for family and friends etc over the decades. I've always had a soft spot for Harry and have seen many astrological predictions for him over the years.

One I do remember which was discussed at the time was from a psychic who predicted his future wife in a vision. She 'saw' long dark hair and brown skin and palm trees. (Meghan is of course California-born.) People didn't take any notice because everyone thought that Harry was into posh blondes only, but it may be that you're thinking of.

This may be of interest to you.
http://royalastrology.tumblr.com/bri...ly-princeharry

Years ago Marjorie Orr, a professional astrologer I admire, stated that Harry would probably marry a foreign bride because of the planets in his ninth House, and also that he has a Venus-line (Venus strongly influences a male chart) which encompassed Russia, parts of Oman and the western coast of Canada and the US.

[Countessmeout]

It's not a matter of time. Bring a royal is barely a part time job at that. It is a matter of security and image.

Nor is hate not being the cutting edge princess's about tradition. It's her. Nothing about her life prior to marriage screams modern or Avant guard. Both Sarah and Diana were said to take fashion chances in their day. No one expects Kate to dress like a fifty year old, she chooses to.

Yes there are traditions Meghan will have to conform too. But also royal brides bring fresh blood and perspective. If anyone is going to bring some avant guard. Fresh perspective its Meghan. Hers is a dress and wedding I'd be excited to see. For all the talk about Kate going modern, I knew when she stepped out, she would be a modern cupcake.

[Duke of Marmalade]

Originally Posted by Countessmeout

They all worked up until engagement.

Letizia continued with her news job. She was reporting on Iraq in 2003, the same year they got engaged.

Letizia even stated in her engagement interview that she would continue to work or will only 'leave slowly' so it was her explicit wish to continue with her work, but in the end it was not possible due to security and neutrality. She never worked again for TVE after the interview/engagement ceremony.

To me for similar reasons there is no chance that there is an engagement between Harry and Meghan and Meghan will continue filming, maybe apart from finishing a few things that need finishing.

[Duke of Marmalade]

Prince Harry spotted holding hands with Meghan Markle | Daily Mail Online

[Cocoasneeze]

Dumb question, but weren't they holding hands in the first pictures we saw of them together, too?

[Dman]

Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze

Dumb question, but weren't they holding hands in the first pictures we saw of them together, too?

Yes, but these pictures are more clear and one can see their hands better. The media decided to make the hands the highlight.

I'm glad they're not too frightened of the thought of being seen as a couple. Right now, they're not trying to play up to the camera. Meghan pretty much keep her head down when they're out and about. That look of a deer in headlights. Harry trying not to show much emotion. All about privacy, but it will change a bit.

It's all better than the game William and Catherine used to play. (Let's act like we're not together, even though everyone know we are.) it's a game that drove me and many others crazy. I know it was a burden lifted off their shoulders once they were able to relax in public.

Best to take a leaf out of Edward and Sophie courtship book. I know some people have short term memory, but Edward and Sophie were very public with their relationship. They were so public that they appeared at royal family events together. We like to think there are some strict protocol of not including girlfriends in the family activities, but that's not entirely true. Edward and Sophie's courtship make me think it's all down to the personal choice of the couple. Different approaches, but it could work.

[Cocoasneeze]

^
I completely agree. Theirs is the most sensible approach. Act like a couple, hold hands etc, but not be OTT about it.

While Meghan is used to the media and publicity, she's not used to the paparazzi attention doing the most mundane and normal things. The camera flashes can be blinding at night time. The article mentioned, that the Made in Chelsea cast were at the same restaurant, which already explains the paparazzi being there.

I have to add, that the meltdowns in DM comment sections and on social media are funny. These commenters really think, that they have a say in whom Harry decides to date, and that by dating Meghan his 'reputation' has gone down with the general public. Most people really don't care, and that makes the fan entitlement even funnier.

[Marty91charmed]

Originally Posted by Dman

Don't know, but Richard made it known over and over again the plans for Catherine to be a senior member of the royal family heading into the Diamond Jubilee. The Sun talked about it too.

Saw his tweet, but don't know how true it is though. Give them some time to get there, imo.

It just crossed my mind that Tanna retweeted that tweet and that he as the first to know some breaking news,as for example, Kate's first pregnancy. Don't know. They usually sound quite sure in their comments. We'll see. It as just a thought on my part.

[miche]

Originally Posted by Dman

It's all better than the game William and Catherine used to play. (Let's act like we're not together, even though everyone know we are.) it's a game that drove me and many others crazy. I know it was a burden lifted off their shoulders once they were able to relax in public.

What game? They went place together, William and Catherine just aren't in PDA. Some couples are just like that, nothing wrong with that

Originally Posted by Marty91charmed

It just crossed my mind that Tanna retweeted that tweet and that he as the first to know some breaking news,as for example, Kate's first pregnancy. Don't know. They usually sound quite sure in their comments. We'll see. It as just a thought on my part.

Tanna also tweeted/hinted that Kate was pregnant back in the fall/winter of 2011, only to backtrack on it.

[Marty91charmed]

Originally Posted by miche

Tanna also tweeted/hinted that Kate was pregnant back in the fall/winter of 2011, only to backtrack on it.

Yes, still... it could have been true. Don't want to speculate, but he has always seemed to get the things right more that his colleagues. Maybe is just lucky... as I said, it was just a thought that corossed my mind. Not more than that.

[miche]

Well he is a paparazzi who digs and hide in people trash to get info.

[Alisa]

Originally Posted by Pranter

You can see the protective stance/position he takes when they are out...very charming to see.


LaRae

I agree. It made me think back to the KP announcement and how he stated he wanted to protect her. It is very charming to see it in action😍

By the way, Meghan's hair looks AMAZING in those pics! It is so lush, full, and shiny!

[AlowVera]

I think Harry is doing everything to protect this relationship. Not only Harry but Meghan also who has given up most social media. She has been through quite a trial through media fire and is still by his side.

[Dman]

Originally Posted by miche

What game? They went place together, William and Catherine just aren't in PDA. Some couples are just like that, nothing wrong with that

Hi,

Not talking about PDA. They did play this game of acting like they're not together, when we all new they were. They liked walking separately. Trying not to talk to each other that much. All that kind of stuff. I was pretty happy when those days were over.

At the moment, Harry and Meghan aren't trying to give camera much of anything. She keeps her head down and hair and her face. Harry trying not to show much emotion. They just need to relax a bit.

[miche]

Originally Posted by Dman

Hi,

Not talking about PDA. They did play this game of acting like they're not together, when we all new they were. They liked walking separately. Trying not to talk to each other that much. All that kind of stuff. I was pretty happy when those days were over.

At the moment, Harry and Meghan aren't trying to give camera much of anything. She keeps her head down and hair and her face. Harry trying not to show much emotion. They just need to relax a bit.

I remember plenty of photos of them during their dating days walking together and getting taxis together when they went out together. There were even videos/paparazzi of them walking together. So truly I don't understand what game they were playing

[Dman]

Originally Posted by miche

I remember plenty of photos of them during their dating days walking together and getting taxis together when they went out together. There were even videos/paparazzi of them walking together. So truly I don't understand what game they were playing

Yes, they did those things, but they also played those games I described. It's better when these couples relax and are comfortable with appearances. Meghan will be able to hold her head up and smile once in a while. Harry will be able to some emotions and the tense and defensive look will melt away.

miche, you'll notice the difference when Harry and Meghan start making more appearances together. Hopefully this new year will bring that about.

[Rudolph]

Whoa nelly! There are going to be a whole lot of disappointed people on here if these two don't get married.


I actually think Meghan being an actress is a hindrance more than anything else.

Celebrities get married all the time after dating for 6 months or whatever. They divorce a year later and get married again after a couple of years. No big deal.

I don't see anything to suggest to me that Meghan takes dating Harry any more seriously than if she was dating some sitcom actor.

I'm not hating on Meghan, it's just world wind romances are the norm in 'Hollywood'. It's nothing for celebrities go from dating, to engagement, to divorce in three years.

And no matter how much attitudes have changed with society and the BRF, Harry would need a divorce like a hole in the head.

[Countessmeout]

There ate plenty of celebrity marriages that have lasted. And usually because both leople aren't in show business. If they do marry she don't be an actress anymore,

Nor does the fact that she has had a failed marriage before say anything about her ability to commit. One failed marriage isn't some dogs she is doomed to misery and broken vows. Both his dad abd Anne have had successful second marriages.

[Curryong]

Why immediately jump to the conclusion that Meghan isn't taking her romance with Harry seriously? She was with her husband to be for several years before they married. Meghan isn't living in Hollywood but in Toronto, a very down to earth city, nor would I characterise her as some air head celebrity who wouldn't take her vows seriously.

This romance seems to many on this thread to be serious, unlike your own summation, Rudolph, and if anyone is jumping to conclusions it's you, as you seem to believe these two are likely to divorce, simply because Meghan is in the acting profession.

[Rudolph]

We'll agree to disagree. Plus someone can be serious about dating and not contemplate marriage. The two don't go necessarily go hand in hand.

I think the people who have them engaged and married with children are the ones jumping to conclusions. I simply don't think celebrities make good partners. It seems like every few months we hear of another 'conscious uncoupling'