Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017 - Page 122

Countessmeout · #**2421** 12-20-2016, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacqui24

RadarOnline has it out for her for some reason. They are obsessed with trying to find topless photos of her. First it was the fake snap chat photo that was going around. And then apparently she went skinny dipping with her ex husband while they were still married, and there are nude photos being shopped around for that. And now this. I just don't get what this girl has done to them?

And this story is as believable as the skinny dipping ones. The skinny dipping ones according to radar were being shopped around since early November. If there were really nude photos, someone would have bought the, by now. People are so anxious to create scandal, the photos would have been snatched up. And I find it highly unlikely radar has seen the photos, as they claim, and didnt buy and publish.

Cocoasneeze · #**2422** 12-20-2016, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacqui24

RadarOnline has it out for her for some reason. They are obsessed with trying to find topless photos of her. First it was the fake snap chat photo that was going around. And then apparently she went skinny dipping with her ex husband while they were still married, and there are nude photos being shopped around for that. And now this. I just don't get what this girl has done to them?

It's not only her. RadarOnline has it out for every woman.
Humiliating any famous woman is their goal.

AlowVera · #**2423** 12-20-2016, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze

It's not only her. RadarOnline has it out for every woman.
Humiliating any famous woman is their goal.

Photos like these should be outlawed just like those photos obtained from hacking. There is nothing to be ashamed of and this will only make Harry fight even more to protect Meghan.

Pranter · #**2424** 12-20-2016, 11:30 AM

Even if there are pics of her topless on a beach....it's not going to effect her relationship with Harry or the BRF.

LaRae

lilacmagnolia · #**2425** 12-20-2016, 11:36 AM

For Meghan the pictures are probably embarrassing but I think we all know it's nothing to worry about...Those pictures are nothing and certainly not worse than Kate's and she will be Queen Consort...Usually I wouldn't have even wasted my time to look but I was worried about how bad they would be...Shocker! Humans have nipples...Nice Try though RadarOnline.I hope Harry and Meghan sue them into bankruptcy for that though.At this point in their relationship I wouldn't even be shocked if Harry did that.

cepe · #**2426** 12-20-2016, 11:45 AM

AS pictures of Harry in ALL his glory have been published, this is nothing to worry about

lilacmagnolia · #**2427** 12-20-2016, 11:47 AM

If Harry Destroys Radar Online like the Press I will be purchasing my RoundTrip Plane ticket the very next day for the 2017 Royal Wedding!!! We'll see!!! He got upset when they put that 20 second tame Suits Scene on PornHub and said they were going to sue in his statement or something if I remember.I think Will and Kate won their topless Case too...

AlowVera · #**2428** 12-20-2016, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia

For Meghan the pictures are probably embarrassing but I think we all know it's nothing to worry about...Those pictures are nothing and certainly not worse than Kate's and she will be Queen Consort...Usually I wouldn't have even wasted my time to look but I was worried about how bad they would be...Shocker! Humans have nipples...Nice Try though RadarOnline.I hope Harry and Meghan sue them into bankruptcy for that though.At this point in their relationship I wouldn't even be shocked if Harry did that.

Not to mention pictures of both Harry and William being grabby lads.

Skippyboo · #**2429** 12-20-2016, 11:48 AM

There are plenty of royal women who were photographed topless. No big deal. Just don't get caught toe sucking someone who isn't your spouse.

Rudolph · #**2430** 12-20-2016, 11:55 AM

In the province of Ontario where Meghan lives and works, a woman can go topless down the main street if she likes. It's not illegal.

In Canada, a woman's chest and nipples are considered no more indecent than a man's.

Angel.10 · #**2431** 12-20-2016, 12:14 PM

Ridiculous dig up old photographs just to denigrate her. Anyway, Kate was also photographed from top-less and Harry naked in Las Vegas

lilacmagnolia · #**2432** 12-20-2016, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angel.10

Ridiculous dig up old photographs just to denigrate her. Anyway, Kate was also photographed from top-less and Harry naked in Las Vegas

Don't forget William's Shortcomings lol...Peeing publicly as a Prince is never a good idea.

Osipi · #**2433** 12-20-2016, 12:24 PM

I think of it this way. When the photos were taken on a beach, she wasn't alone on said beach and it didn't bother her that people could see a certain part of her anatomy in all its glory. She has, most likely, worn next to nothing that leaves little to the imagination on that certain part of her anatomy in her work as an actress and it didn't bother her. I think we can be almost 99.9% sure that somewhere down the line, Harry has seen this certain part of her anatomy in all its glory and in fact, most likely very much enjoyed it and that didn't bother either of these people.

So, with the release of these topless photographs from years ago on a beach somewhere in Greece, I'm going to just shrug and say "no big deal" and hope this is the reaction that both Harry and Meghan have. The best reaction that the vermin, that attempted to "shame" and "embarrass" and "scandalize the public" and "demean" and whatever other adjectives we can come up with, deserve is no reaction at all.

Bamp! Try again Radar Online.

lilacmagnolia · #**2434** 12-20-2016, 12:24 PM

Queen Elizabeth II Supports Prince Harry, Meghan Markle - Us Weekly

I'm sure she does but USWeekly is sketchy!

miss whirley · #**2435** 12-20-2016, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osipi

I think of it this way. When the photos were taken on a beach, she wasn't alone on said beach and it didn't bother her that people could see a certain part of her anatomy in all its glory. She has, most likely, worn next to nothing that leaves little to the imagination on that certain part of her anatomy in her work as an actress and it didn't bother her. I think we can be almost 99.9% sure that somewhere down the line, Harry has seen this certain part of her anatomy in all its glory and in fact, most likely very much enjoyed it and that didn't bother either of these people.

So, with the release of these topless photographs from years ago on a beach somewhere in Greece, I'm going to just shrug and say "no big deal" and hope this is the reaction that both Harry and Meghan have. The best reaction that the vermin, that attempted to "shame" and "embarrass" and "scandalize the public" and "demean" and whatever other adjectives we can come up with, deserve is no reaction at all.

Bamp! Try again Radar Online.

Exactly. When Camilla was photographed topless in 2013, Charles and Camilla had no reaction, at least publicly. Privately, they could have warned the editors, though.

Rudolph · #**2436** 12-20-2016, 12:39 PM

Prince Harry's girlfriend Meghan Markle's sad rift from her sister is revealed by family | Daily Mail Online

Osipi · #**2437** 12-20-2016, 12:41 PM

I don't care if the source is "the wife of a high ranking courtier" or "the silver polisher at Buckingham Palace" or even "the hedge clipper who works outside of the Queen's office", no one has any kind of a clue how HM, The Queen feels about any of her family's personal relationships. There can be indications of involvement with "advisors" (which I think is an excellent thing if true which kind of shows a level of caring on Harry's part) and there can be reports of how problematic a high profile romance can be but I'm not going to take anyone else's word as gospel truth when it comes to this relationship.

Time will tell which way the wind blows and even weather forecasters can't be 100% accurate either.

Ish · #**2438** 12-20-2016, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miss whirley

Exactly. When Camilla was photographed topless in 2013, Charles and Camilla had no reaction, at least publicly. Privately, they could have warned the editors, though.

Camilla was photographed topless?

Osipi · #**2439** 12-20-2016, 01:28 PM

I vaguely recall hearing something along those lines but it obviously didn't create an international incident or threaten world peace or start a revolution.

**Zonk** · #**2440** 12-20-2016, 01:35 PM

Meghan biggest drawback is her family [not a serious drawback but a pain nonetheless] and not even her immediate family. I mean, my goodness, we are quoting heavily, her father's first wife and her son [one she had apparently after her marriage to Meghan's father broke up], two people who are not even related to her. Though I will admit they did kind of discredit Meghan's sister.

When one becomes famous or at least well known via the press, the sharks [family and friends both old and new] see dollar signs. But hey, it's worked for Jessica Hay.

Does anyone know if the Daily Mail pay for stories or just pictures....