 |
|

03-31-2014, 08:20 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,014
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalDaisy
I thought that Emilia Jardine-Paterson was a school with Catherine
After being together c.13-14 years I think talking about "his" circle isn't accurate - by now its their circle of friends.
|
Yeah but they have been his friends since childhood, what about her childhood friends?Just a thought.
|

04-01-2014, 12:57 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 5,907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher
I was thinking the same thing, especially in the unlikely event that he were to marry Chelsy. Left to their own devices, I think William and Catherine would have had a destination wedding in Africa.
Harry is more outgoing and at ease in crowds than William. There is a lot of affection for Harry and my sense is that the British public would not mind if his wedding were a state occasion with all the trappings. I just get the feeling that Cressida wouldn't want a large state occasion. Windsor is smaller than Westminster, but it is still pretty big. There were more than 500+ guests at Sophie and Edward's wedding (my wedding was about 100 people).
I hope whomever Harry marries gets the wedding of her dreams. If it is Cressida, I think she'll have to compromise on what she wants, unfortunately.
|
I've read that the Cambridges wanted a smaller wedding at St. George's Chapel, but were informed by HM and the PM that they would be marrying at the Abbey.
|

04-01-2014, 02:19 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,342
|
|
 They may have had a little "wouldn't it be nice" moment, but there is no way on Gods green earth that William didn't know exactly what was expected of him and, since they'd been together over 10 years, I rather think the same goes for Catherine.
But isn't this thread supposed to be about Harry and his eventual lady?
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

04-01-2014, 05:44 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arnhem, Netherlands
Posts: 361
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher
That is one issue and another is whether the wedding would be a national holiday, where the government and banks are closed. Harry is very popular in Great Britain, so although there would be detractors, I am not sure that most people will mind. Most people didn't mind the cost of William's wedding.
I think it will depend on the state of the economy and whether his bride is popular.
|
That is why I think a Royal Wedding next year (IF there is an engagement at the end of this year) woud be tricky because the debate of the costs etc. could become part (albeit a small part) of the general elections.
This could be a point to consider for the pair and the Royal Family because of its potential backlash.
__________________
HRH
|

04-01-2014, 06:53 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,546
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLLK
I've read that the Cambridges wanted a smaller wedding at St. George's Chapel, but were informed by HM and the PM that they would be marrying at the Abbey.
|
I read that somewhere as I well. I think William wanted his wedding to be small and private, but deep down he knew being who he was that was never going to happen. Andrew and Fergie wanted the big shebang in Westminster, whereas Edward got lucky and got what he wanted - small, family affair. Sometimes it does suck to be the heir!
I think Harry's wedding will reflect Edward's wedding mainly because I think Harry would want a smaller affair, just like his brother wanted but couldn't have. I also prefer St George's Chapel to Westminster Abbey. I was at St George's Chapel visiting it and I was in awe of the architecture, though I was surprised by how much smaller it looks in real life! It definitely felt more personal than Westminster, which is so big and vast.
__________________
"I am yours, you are mine, of that be sure. You are locked in my heart, the little key is lost and now you must stay there forever." Written by Princess Alix of Hesse and by Rhine in the diary of her fiance, Tsarevich Nicholas.
|

04-03-2014, 05:30 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 194
|
|
Its only the front page at the moment
http://t.co/hido10GYvb
speechless at the thought!
|

04-03-2014, 05:30 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 194
|
|
Its only the front page at the moment
http://t.co/hido10GYvb
speechless at the thought!
|

04-03-2014, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
The DM has been speculating about an imminent engagement for awhile now. It's the DM. If and when an engagement is announced, it won't come from them.
|

04-03-2014, 05:37 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 194
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish
The DM has been speculating about an imminent engagement for awhile now. It's the DM. If and when an engagement is announced, it won't come from them.
|
you, know I realise that - having followed the royals for a while. However, it is interesting that they are leading on this story. That is why I posted it.
|

04-03-2014, 06:02 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 15,827
|
|
I try not to read much into 'engagement' speculation, then again, it was Royal Commentator Robert Jobson that broke the news that Charles & Camilla were to wed in 2005 in the London's Evening Standard. You just never know until something is officially announced.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."
A.W. TOZER
|

04-03-2014, 06:12 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 194
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman
I try not to read much into 'engagement' speculation, then again, it was Royal Commentator Robert Jobson that broke the news that Charles & Camilla were to wed in 2005 in the London's Evening Standard. You just never know until something is officially announced.
|
that's v true. Generally, there is at least a smidge of something worthwhile in the stories. What I'd love to know is background to getting the story - that's far more interesting!
|

04-03-2014, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Well any family is going to discuss it amongst themselves when a member talks about getting married even if it's not a prince. So I am sure they have or will have discussions but a summit...that's a bit over the top.
LaRae
|

04-03-2014, 08:25 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,342
|
|
I don't know how much truth there is in the current speculation, but the photos definitely speak of a romantic relationship. While Harry has been totally public about wanting to be a father it has been the other half of the equation that has been lacking.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...06_634x387.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...16_634x375.jpg
Perhaps they are madly in love and perhaps they will announce their engagement sooner rather than later. Only time, or a ring, will tell.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

04-03-2014, 08:38 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Giraffe Land, United States
Posts: 2,567
|
|
Harry and Cressie are gettin' hitched?????
Great, where's my popcorn!
__________________
The future George VII's opinion on infant carriers,
"One is not amused."
|

04-03-2014, 11:59 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,342
|
|
 You're right Gracie, it is all theatre and one that we all enjoy. Pass the popcorn.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

04-04-2014, 08:07 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,800
|
|
I don't think they're getting engaged this year. She's super young still and it's not as if he has a biological clock ticking. They should enjoy just being together before the whole married life starts.
|

04-04-2014, 09:21 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,645
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empress Merel
I don't think they're getting engaged this year. She's super young still and it's not as if he has a biological clock ticking. They should enjoy just being together before the whole married life starts.
|
She is 25, not 18.
I really don't see the point of dating for a decade or so. I think after several years, anyone would want to move on to the next level.
|

04-04-2014, 09:56 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,800
|
|
25 is young to get married and they haven't even been dating for two years yet. Let the girl get eased into it if she wants to stay.
|

04-04-2014, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: kapaa, United States
Posts: 1,214
|
|
I don't think she is too young, I think the main issue would be, is she ready for the royal life.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using The Royals Community mobile app
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|