 |
|
09-09-2009, 04:37 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
|
|
09-09-2009, 06:32 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
I thought so! I remembered it was in the press but it's been awhile. BTW a cattle handler is called a jackaroo in Australia.
Those pics are sweet of him holding the baby. Cheeky of you about Harry being a father. 
|
09-09-2009, 07:23 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: -, Germany
Posts: 3,587
|
|
|
|
09-10-2009, 02:05 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coastal, Ireland
Posts: 2,509
|
|
|
|
09-10-2009, 07:11 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cd255
|
 That photo is too funny. Where was it taken at?
|
09-11-2009, 01:39 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
|
Did it have something to do with art class at Eton?
|
09-13-2009, 04:41 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sereta
That photo is too funny. Where was it taken at? |
I'm glad you enjoyed it. It was taken at Harry's school, Eton during his last year.
|
09-14-2009, 07:32 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
|
Oh, thanks. I never would've guessed it was his school. Perhaps it was in the science classroom then.
|
09-15-2009, 01:31 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coastal, Ireland
Posts: 2,509
|
|
|
|
09-15-2009, 06:07 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
|
|
09-16-2009, 04:58 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
Happy Birthday to Prince Harry!
That was a nice walk down memory lane cd255. Nicely done.
I like this pic with Harry and William. http://home-and-garden.webshots.com/...85180389cobQlH
And I have a question about it. I notice that William is barefoot. I remember reading somewhere that it's a tradition in the British Royal family that their babies don't wear anything on their feet until a certain age. Is this true? And if so how/why did this tradition start? And at what age are they allowed to start wearing shoes? Thanks for any answers.
|
09-17-2009, 04:44 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: tehran, Iran
Posts: 640
|
|
|
|
09-17-2009, 09:09 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 191
|
|
I can't believe that he is 25 years old. My Lord, The boy/man has come along way.
Thanks for the pics everyone. I must say that he is now the Looker of the Royal Family. He has surpassed william big time. He as only gotten better looking as he has gotten older.
William is still good looking However, He is not aging well at all. & He is only in his 20's.
|
09-19-2009, 04:19 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coastal, Ireland
Posts: 2,509
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanaz
I like this pic with Harry and William. Prince William hold newborn brother Prince Harry pictures from collecting photos on webshots
And I have a question about it. I notice that William is barefoot. I remember reading somewhere that it's a tradition in the British Royal family that their babies don't wear anything on their feet until a certain age. Is this true? And if so how/why did this tradition start? And at what age are they allowed to start wearing shoes? Thanks for any answers. |
That's a good question. I don't know anything about a tradition but I have noticed in a few pictures they are barefoot at a very young age. This picture being one of them. http://tinypic.com/hwh11l.jpg
And it looks like it's cold so I don't know why they wouldn't have anything on their feet.
|
09-19-2009, 04:36 PM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
There's a school of thought that children shouldn't wear shoes until they actually start walking. But yes, I wonder why he's not wearing socks...unless he took them off just before they left the plane! 
|
09-20-2009, 03:48 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coastal, Ireland
Posts: 2,509
|
|
 So maybe it's just to help the development of their feet. Yes kids do sometimes take their socks off. My niece hated having socks on her feet and took them off whenever her mama wasn't looking. Also, maybe they didn't feel Harry needed anything if he was just being quickly transferred from the plane to the car.
Here's another pic of Harry (and William) barefoot: http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Co...1w.ss_full.jpg
And not barefoot: http://dianachildren1.tripod.com/030.jpg
|
09-22-2009, 04:59 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 9
|
|
|
harry was so cute!!!! he was my favorite and is my favorite!!!
|
09-22-2009, 07:03 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The, United States
Posts: 1,994
|
|
You must have an extensive collection of pictures maryamj. I've never seen pic #3 (in the third group of pics) before with the hats. I quite like it.
Also pic #2 (also in third group) looks like William is saluting but I'm sure he's just shielding his eyes from the sun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rchat
|
This picture of Harry with his play pony is precious! Perhaps he was learning to play polo even back then.
Btw thanks everyone for your input about not wearing shoes when they were younger. It makes sense. 
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
