The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1901  
Old 05-01-2018, 01:54 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,908
If Priddy feels like she’s the one who’s been wronged, it may give her satisfaction to sell pics and stories. None of us knows what really went on.

A 30 year friendship ended over something. What percentage of blame is with either party is much more complicated
__________________

  #1902  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:05 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
Well, I believe in karma and it can be a b@!#h!!! Don't do to others what you don't want done to you.

On top of that....Meghan's life has taken an unbelievable turn....one that no one thought would have been possible...and if things had remained the same...Priddy would have been part of the celebrations. But now...she is on the outside looking in. That can't be a good feeling.
__________________

  #1903  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:27 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTchic View Post
That is thing no one ends friendship like that. Also note that she was the one that ended the friendship and not Meghan.
Can you cite your source for this information? Thank you.
  #1904  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:29 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
Their friendship ended in 2013, according to Priddy. If she wasn't bitterly selling out pictures and one sided tabloid stories about Meghan, 5 years after their friendship ended, we wouldn't know any of it. We shouldn't know any of it, but Priddy decided to make money out of this friendship, and here we are. IMHO it is very telling, that Meghan is still close friends with their other two friends, while Priddy s out there trying to paint Meghan in a bad light. That imho tells me everything I need to know.

Priddy said herself in the first daily mail interview she gave, that she ended the friendship because Meghan left Trevor, and she didn't agree with that. Or something like that.
  #1905  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:37 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
If Priddy feels like she’s the one who’s been wronged, it may give her satisfaction to sell pics and stories. None of us knows what really went on.

A 30 year friendship ended over something. What percentage of blame is with either party is much more complicated
Exactly, thank you for the voice of reason. It can't be all one person's fault that the relationship broke down.
  #1906  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:42 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy- View Post
Exactly, thank you for the voice of reason. It can't be all one person's fault that the relationship broke down.
No one else, except Priddy, is claiming that. Priddy is however the one who has gone to the press and sold out Meghan on a negative light, and Meghan has not and won't say a word. While Meghan is quiet, Priddy has tried to paint Meghan in a very negative light to daily mail and it's millions of readers. That's unfair, and wrong, in my books.
  #1907  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:44 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
Their friendship ended in 2013, according to Priddy. If she wasn't bitterly selling out pictures and one sided tabloid stories about Meghan, 5 years after their friendship ended, we wouldn't know any of it. We shouldn't know any of it, but Priddy decided to make money out of this friendship, and here we are. IMHO it is very telling, that Meghan is still close friends with their other two friends, while Priddy s out there trying to paint Meghan in a bad light. That imho tells me everything I need to know.

Priddy said herself in the first daily mail interview she gave, that she ended the friendship because Meghan left Trevor, and she didn't agree with that. Or something like that.
Again, sources/links?

It's been reported that Meghan mailed her wedding rings to Trevor as a way of breaking up instead of doing it in person. I have to say that would certainly have made me question the kind of person my supposed friend was if she could do something so cold-blooded.

Meghan Markle 'ended first marriage by posting rings back to Trevor Engelson' | Metro News
  #1908  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:47 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy- View Post
Exactly, thank you for the voice of reason. It can't be all one person's fault that the relationship broke down.
I'm not saying it's all one person's fault. I'm saying that we don't know what happened. However, Priddy is the one who is selling Meghan out to the tabloids. And if she shares as much of the blame for the friendship ending, then it makes her selling out to be tabloids even more reprehensible!
  #1909  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:53 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy- View Post
Again, sources/links?

It's been reported that Meghan mailed her wedding rings to Trevor as a way of breaking up instead of doing it in person. I have to say that would certainly have made me question the kind of person my supposed friend was if she could do something so cold-blooded.

Meghan Markle 'ended first marriage by posting rings back to Trevor Engelson' | Metro News
The first daily mail interview Priddy gave. I'm not going to search for it and post links. If you're interested, I suppose it would be easy to google.

Again these one sided reports on how Meghan evilly ended the marriage by posting the rings and Trevor has no clue why, or that the marriage was ending. I'm just not buying either narrative. Like you and Rudolph pointed out, never does a relationship or friendship end because of just one person, but all these tabloid articles from Priddy and about the divorce try to paint Meghan as the one alone in the wrong.

As for mailing the rings, IF that happened. I see nothing wrong with that. The relationship was over, why was a face to face meeting needed in order to return the rings?
  #1910  
Old 05-01-2018, 02:55 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 215
"...What came to light after Trevor and I spoke ended my friendship with Meghan."

Meghan Markle revelations by the friend who knew her best | Daily Mail Online
  #1911  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:00 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,288
That particular gem is in the bio Morton wrote on Meghan. I have the book. Morton never got to speak to any of Meghan's friends, nor did he manage to speak to Trevor or to Cory the chef. A male friend of Trevor's told Morton the anecdote about the rings, so it's second hand info at best. It seems to have been spread about by those who take Trevor's side.
  #1912  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:01 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 215
-missy That info was from Priddy herself and this woman has an axe to grind.
  #1913  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:02 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,557
I wouldn't be surprised if Meghan really had considered having Priddy front and center at her wedding as a longtime friend that she had a falling out with *until* she started blabbing to the press. That is probably what sealed the deal against an invitation. With the scope of the role that Meghan is going to be taking on and most likely hearing how Harry has built his "circle of trust" around him over the years, Meghan found it wiser to leave Priddy out of things.

Meghan has never openly talked about her marriage ending or the causes and effects of it because, frankly, its no one's business. I'm not getting involved in taking sides about something that happened between two people that pertained only to the two people involved.

To me, people jumping on the Meghan bandwagon either positively or negatively has all stemmed from a situation that really rocketed Meghan front and center in the world. Its kind of like winning a huge lottery and instantly people you never think of that you once knew crawl out of the woodwork because well... you won the lottery.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #1914  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:05 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 215
Exactly! Don't get me started on that hack's book of second and third accounts on Meghan's life.
  #1915  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:08 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Terri View Post
I'm not saying it's all one person's fault. I'm saying that we don't know what happened. However, Priddy is the one who is selling Meghan out to the tabloids. And if she shares as much of the blame for the friendship ending, then it makes her selling out to be tabloids even more reprehensible!
What does Priddy have to lose, why should she be loyal to a person who doesn't give two seconds thought about her?

It's in Meghan's best interest to remain quiet, she doesn't get any points for not blabbing back imo.

Thanks for the link CTchic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
The first daily mail interview Priddy gave. I'm not going to search for it and post links. If you're interested, I suppose it would be easy to google.

Again these one sided reports on how Meghan evilly ended the marriage by posting the rings and Trevor has no clue why, or that the marriage was ending. I'm just not buying either narrative. Like you and Rudolph pointed out, never does a relationship or friendship end because of just one person, but all these tabloid articles from Priddy and about the divorce try to paint Meghan as the one alone in the wrong.

As for mailing the rings, IF that happened. I see nothing wrong with that. The relationship was over, why was a face to face meeting needed in order to return the rings?
We must have been reading a different article, because nothing in the one I posted said anything about Trevor having no clue the marriage was ending, it said he was devastated by her sending the rings back and that he was shell shocked after the marriage ended. I think it goes without saying that two adults know if their marriage is in trouble, it wouldn't have come as a surprise except in the way she did it.
  #1916  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:15 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
You know you're right!!! Meghan doesnt give these people a second thought! Priddy, half siblings, cousins, people she has had no relationship with in years. Tney will all have their 15 minutes of fame and then be forgotton.
  #1917  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:18 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 215
But why is Priddy involving herself in her friend's marriage? It was between Meghan and Trevor. Last I checked none of them are talking and Priddy should have kept her comments about their marriage to herself.

She sold out her former friend because she is bitter that her friend has moved on and things seem to be going well for her. She is bitter and jealous.
  #1918  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:18 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
The fact remains that Meghan has never spoken about her marriage. She has never told her story and the only people who have talked about it have been paid to tell her stories and are making a nice profit from it. No one who is close with Meghan has told her side of the story.

I assume its not something she is happy about. Usually a failed marriage is used to create a narrative for someone who is famous. Meghan has kept both her relationship with her ex and with Cory out of her narrative, preferring to leave that part of her life private.

One would say sending back the rings was cruel but I think keeping the rings would have been cruel as well. One would say only taking a blender was mean, but to divorce in California and not want anything when most would get alimony says that she at least did not want to prolong or cause extended acrimony. People throw around the world gold digger....but no gold digger gives back the rings, sign away their rights to claim money in the future, not get half of the property and only take a blender. It should be noted that California is both no fault and also property is split 50/50 in which Meghan decided she only wanted a blender.
  #1919  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:19 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
Priddy looks like a petty jealous person for selling 30 years of friendship to tabloids for allegedly 6 figures. She's looking like she hasn't got over the friendship ending on her choice, even after 5 years after it ended.

And like others have said, why was Priddy so involved in Meghan and Trevor's marriage? Why did she need to find intimate details why it ended? Why was it her business?
  #1920  
Old 05-01-2018, 03:20 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Terri View Post
You know you're right!!! Meghan doesnt give these people a second thought! Priddy, half siblings, cousins, people she has had no relationship with in years. Tney will all have their 15 minutes of fame and then be forgotton.
Of course she doesn't give them a second thought, she burned their bridge loooong ago. That's the thing though, smart people don't burn bridges, they know that it may feel good at the moment but in the future they may have made an enemy. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer as the saying goes.
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
kate middleton, meghan markle, royal family


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Current Events 1: November 2017 - May 2018 soapstar Current Events Archive 832 05-20-2018 06:28 AM
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, General News 1: November 2017 - May 2018 Cocoasneeze Current Events Archive 1431 05-20-2018 06:25 AM
Meghan Markle's Fashion and Style Part 1: November 2017 - May 2018 JessRulz Archives 2048 05-19-2018 03:22 AM




Popular Tags
america american archie mountbatten-windsor background story baptism birth britain britannia british royal family british royals brownbitcoinqueen camilla camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing colorblindness commonwealth countries countess of snowdon customs daisy doge of venice doll dresses dubai duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii family tree general news thread george vi gradenigo gustaf vi adolf highgrove history hochberg house of windsor jack brooksbank jewellery książ castle line of succession list of rulers luxembourg medical meghan markle monarchy nepal nepalese royal jewels prince constantijn prince harry princess alexia (2005 -) princess catharina-amalia princess chulabhorn walailak princess of orange princess ribha queen consort queen elizabeth ii queen maxima royal ancestry solomon j solomon speech sussex suthida swedish queen taiwan tradition uae customs unfinished portrait united states of america wales


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×