Meghan Markle: Family and Background - November 2017-May 2018

[Pranter]

Meghan tells P.M. she's single/free agent in May 2016.
Meghan goes on a blind date with Harry in June 2016

No idea why folks are spending any time carrying on about Meghan cheating on anyone.



LaRae

[Cocoasneeze]

I'm curious about these inconsistencies some posters claim there have been from the start of this relationship.

I started posting on this forum pretty much when there started to be rumours about these two, in October 2016. Not one person here or anywhere even hinted at Harry and Meghan being a couple before that time. The Harry's romantic life thread here was filled with multiple other names, it seemed to be a running joke, that any woman Harry was seen near, suddenly became his girlfriend. Meghan Markle was never mentioned.

Piers Morgan was one of the first people claiming that he had met Meghan, who had said she had become recently single, and that Piers possibly put her into a cab to meet Harry unknowingly. Piers would've definitely blabbed, had Meghan mentioned Harry's name, and he would not have said she was single had Meghan herself not said that. Piers doesn't do stuff like that. He blabs and throws people under the bus on the regular.

Now as multiple people here say, Meghan was not known to many before October 2016. None of us have any idea about her relationship with Corey, when it started, when it ended, nothing. At one point there was gossip, that Meghan was dating that golfer Rory, but it was denied, and Rory was already with his now fiance, Meghan was with Corey. That's how little info there was about Meghan's relationship.

After Harry/Meghan relationship became public, MANY people suddenly claimed inside info to the Meghan/Corey relationship in order to paint Meghan in a negative light. I call bs. Suddenly these people became experts of a relationship between Corey and Meghan, whom they had never heard of before, never were interested in before, just because Meghan was now involved with Prince Harry.

It is true, that we tend to believe sources, that agree with our bias. But we can also be critical of any info out there. Many of these negative sources (as well as positive ones) have been rubbished by either Meghan and Harry or credible proof. Eg Samantha claimed at first, that she practically raised Meghan from early age, a claim that got rubbished by facts. Like most of her other claims too. Many articles by royal reporters have been rubbishes by Meghan and Harry, like Meghan saying that it was her first visit to Scotland, when RR had claimed otherwise. Regardless of our 'bias' it's always smart to withhold believing any unverified info until it's proven, positive or negative.

[CTchic]

Piers Morgan ran his mouth in the press and on TV about his connection with Meghan. They met the one time in London but had previously interacted on social media.He is a hack but he did confirm at the time (July 2016) that Meghan was single and ready to mingle. Lucky for us, he did not know it was Harry cos he would have said something and the relationship would have been over before it started. Now he accuses Meghan of ghosting him. I think more like Harry wised her up on his previous shenanigans and she kept a safe distance ever since.

This whole mess about Meghan dumping Corey for Harry after they met in Toronto was BS ftom the start cos they were not even in the same country. That mistruth spread like wildfire and some on here still believe it even though it has been debunked.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze

I'm curious about these inconsistencies some posters claim there have been from the start of this relationship.

I started posting on this forum pretty much when there started to be rumours about these two, in October 2016. Not one person here or anywhere even hinted at Harry and Meghan being a couple before that time. The Harry's romantic life thread here was filled with multiple other names, it seemed to be a running joke, that any woman Harry was seen near, suddenly became his girlfriend. Meghan Markle was never mentioned.

Piers Morgan was one of the first people claiming that he had met Meghan, who had said she had become recently single, and that Piers possibly put her into a cab to meet Harry unknowingly. Piers would've definitely blabbed, had Meghan mentioned Harry's name, and he would not have said she was single had Meghan herself not said that. Piers doesn't do stuff like that. He blabs and throws people under the bus on the regular.

Now as multiple people here say, Meghan was not known to many before October 2016. None of us have any idea about her relationship with Corey, when it started, when it ended, nothing. At one point there was gossip, that Meghan was dating that golfer Rory, but it was denied, and Rory was already with his now fiance, Meghan was with Corey. That's how little info there was about Meghan's relationship.

After Harry/Meghan relationship became public, MANY people suddenly claimed inside info to the Meghan/Corey relationship in order to paint Meghan in a negative light. I call bs. Suddenly these people became experts of a relationship between Corey and Meghan, whom they had never heard of before, never were interested in before, just because Meghan was now involved with Prince Harry.

It is true, that we tend to believe sources, that agree with our bias. But we can also be critical of any info out there. Many of these negative sources (as well as positive ones) have been rubbished by either Meghan and Harry or credible proof. Eg Samantha claimed at first, that she practically raised Meghan from early age, a claim that got rubbished by facts. Like most of her other claims too. Many articles by royal reporters have been rubbishes by Meghan and Harry, like Meghan saying that it was her first visit to Scotland, when RR had claimed otherwise. Regardless of our 'bias' it's always smart to withhold believing any unverified info until it's proven, positive or negative.

Exactly. Bottom line is there are times conflicting stories will come out with whatever sources they come from. How to differentiate them over time is the credibility of those sources. From what we've heard from Meghan and Harry and sources that will put their name to the story to back it up along with anonymous sources, the most consistent and strongest story has always been they met in July. When considering sources, we also have to consider the motive. Does someone have an ulterior motive to lie? Sometimes, but not in Piers Morgan and her ex-agent's case to shine the better light on them. I would think both of thesse people might have an ax to grind as they've now been left in the dust. They might be better people than that, but I highly doubt they would go out there and lie for Meghan. Now, if someone wants to claim they met earlier, and Meghan cheated with Harry on Cory and put their name out to support it, I will give them the same consideration in credibility.

[Spectator]

No way Harry and Meghan met May because Harry only stayed 2 nights in Toronto while Meghan was in Mexico at the time.I also remember a Toronto star article from a guy that knows Cory.He said Cory was telling people he was single in early July which fit Meghan telling piers she was single
Also which friend sets someone in a relationship on a blind date?

[ashelen]

Originally Posted by Rudolph

Read more: Meghan Markle's friend Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne reveals all on Harry romance | Daily Mail Online

Reading the article, I really agree with Gina she should had drop her a line instead of sending her lawyers answering her.
For me if this is true , seems that Megan did not need Gina anymore so their friendship was base in interest for Megan, as now she doesn't need Gina anymore she couldn't care less for her friendship either

[AlowVera]

Originally Posted by ashelen

Reading the article, I really agree with Gina she should had drop her a line instead of sending her lawyers answering her.
For me if this is true , seems that Megan did not need Gina anymore so their friendship was base in interest for Megan, as now she doesn't need Gina anymore she couldn't care less for her friendship either

Umm Nope Gina was her agent, which means they had a contractual relationship that ended when the contract was over.

Also the more involved she became with Harry the more insular she became because of the nature of the royal family.

[jacqui24]

TBF, Kruger Crown also released a statement they shouldn't have as soon as the relationship came to light. Do you keep in touch with someone that betrays you that way? This is part of the story that wasn't mentioned in this article.

And btw, I'm assuming that it was after the relationship came to light that Gina last emailed Meghan because Gina said Meghan wrote her a lovely email the week before her relationship came to light to terminate the contract. I'm assuming it was after that. Kruger Crown released that statement pretty early on after the relationship came to light. Well before the KP statement.

[ACO]

Originally Posted by Spectator

No way Harry and Meghan met May because Harry only stayed 2 nights in Toronto while Meghan was in Mexico at the time.I also remember a Toronto star article from a guy that knows Cory.He said Cory was telling people he was single in early July which fit Meghan telling piers she was single
Also which friend sets someone in a relationship on a blind date?

I can't find it but there is an article by a Canadian press about where Cory talks about breaking up with his girlfriend "a few weeks ago." Anyone know what I am talking about? The timeline is really not off. They were pretty much over by April/May. Meghan was on that "Eat, Pray, Love" vacation in June that went into Lindsay's bachelorette weekend. Then she flew to London right after that in the last days of June and that is when she met Piers and Harry. Per her IG she was back to Toronto by July 5th. Then the peonies bouquets (obviously from Harry) started making a lot of appearances.

[Spectator]

Originally Posted by ACO

I can't find it but there is an article by a Canadian press about where Cory talks about breaking up with his girlfriend "a few weeks ago." Anyone know what I am talking about? The timeline is really not off. They were pretty much over by April/May. Meghan was on that "Eat, Pray, Love" vacation in June that went into Lindsay's bachelorette weekend. Then she flew to London right after that in the last days of June and that is when she met Piers and Harry. Per her IG she was back to Toronto by July 5th. Then the peonies bouquets (obviously from Harry) started making a lot of appearances.

Yeah it's the same one

[Cocoasneeze]

Originally Posted by ashelen

Reading the article, I really agree with Gina she should had drop her a line instead of sending her lawyers answering her.
For me if this is true , seems that Megan did not need Gina anymore so their friendship was base in interest for Megan, as now she doesn't need Gina anymore she couldn't care less for her friendship either

Gina was Meghan's agent. She worked for Meghan for 2 years. After two years Meghan terminated the contract because she didn't need Gina's agent services any more. Meghan wrote a lovely email to Gina when she terminated the contract.

Now as for Gina, way to sell out your ex client. I am curious how much more she was paid than Priddy. Allegedly Priddy got 6 figures for selling intimate details about Meghan's life to DailyFail. No doubt Gina was paid more, as she revealed private details about Meghan's life to DF, and she revealed info about how Harry and Meghan met.

Gina is the one here, who's done wrong, not Meghan. Gina sold extremely private info about Meghan, her previous client, to the tabloids. She praises herself for not telling about the romance to her husband, while blabbing to DailyFail.

Interestingly, no matter who they pay and bribe, these tabloids have found NOTHING scandalous of Meghan. The worst Meghan has done is take a blender in the divorce, mail back the rings to her ex, and get annoyed, when asked to move from her first class seat to an economy seat in an airplane, which she did without a hassle, just complained afterwards. That is the worst these tabloids have found on Meghan, even after paying hundreds of thousands for any scandalous scoop.

[AlowVera]

Meghan hired Gina to be her agent, as the one paying money to Gina she has every right to terminate her services. A contract is not a friendship. She owes Gina nothing more. Clearly she did not get an invitation.

[Zonk]

Yes, that's what I am thinking.

If she had an invitation she wouldn't be talking.

And honestly, I am surprised that as agent she decided to speak up. Even though they are public figures, most actors depend on discretion in certain facets of their life. An agent should be in the background working on deals for their client. Not speaking in the press about a former client. Who would want to hire her in the future?

[AlowVera]

And clearly once her relationship with Harry became more serious she would have to be more discreet about her communications and what she said to people and who she could trust.

[ACO]

Yes, it is pretty clear this woman was expecting an invite and didn't get one. So now she talking. She also had a clear agenda with it. She was painting a picture that Meghan was great until she met Harry. "This version [that no longer wants to work with me] is not her." was the implication. The hoot is that she speaks out how she keep things a secret and she would "never betray" her and yet here she is blabbing to the Daily Mail.

[Cocoasneeze]

There are still 39 days before the wedding. I bet daily mail will have soon Meghan's ex yoga instructor talking to them how Meghan's mannerism completely changed after meeting Harry, and how she rudely stopped her membership out of the blue, with no prior personal notice. Just simply upped and left, stopped going there.
Added the dog sitter, hairdressers, nail saloon, and mail man will all chime in, how they noticed a certain change in Meghan after the relationship became serious. Can't wait to read about these new exclusives...

[CTchic]

Originally Posted by ashelen

Reading the article, I really agree with Gina she should had drop her a line instead of sending her lawyers answering her.
For me if this is true , seems that Megan did not need Gina anymore so their friendship was base in interest for Megan, as now she doesn't need Gina anymore she couldn't care less for her friendship either

Meghan was this woman's client not friend. She may have felt a friendship but at the end of the day , they had a contractual friendship that end. Given the nature of her relationship with Harry and the media intrusion once it was outed, it made sense Meghan closed ranks as to who she can trust. This woman clearly expected an invite and because it never came, she talking! I hope she gets no more clients or clients she does have leave her as this is very unprofessional.

[Lady Reem]

Originally Posted by Rudolph

Are you suggesting that Harry ‘knew’ the name of an obscure American actress he ends up proposing to?

Like everything else about the Meghan and Harry love story, there’s lots of holes and inconsistencies.

Even when Meghan dumped Cory for Harry is in dispute depending on which source you believe.

Do you have any evidence she actually dumped Cory for Harry?

[Osipi]

What this all tells me is that if this agent felt that she had a "friendship" going with Meghan rather than just doing business on a contractual level, it points to Meghan's ability to interact and get along with everyone she comes into contact with. Its a characteristic well associated with Harry also as he seems to make the person he's engaged with and talking with feel like his new best friend.

The relationship with Harry, as it grew, demanded more of a "closed rank" of a circle of friends and we saw that gradually happen as Meghan shut down her social media, relinquished several contracts (Reitman's for example) and was not found by the media to be easy to access.

[Cocoasneeze]

I'm still confused why this woman acts upset. She comes across so unprofessional. She worked for Meghan for two years. When Meghan ended their contract after 2 years, she was upset, because she knew their 'friendship' would end, too. That's no friendship, and this lady knows it too. Then she proceeds to sell her previous client's private information to a tabloid. And this lady and others act like Meghan is the social climber and user here. Meghan is the cut throat one here, who uses people, and tosses them away when she doesn't need them. Yet these people (this agent and Priddy) are selling Meghan's private information to tabloids for six figures. Meghan is the one who left a marriage with just a blender. I'm so confused by this narrative they try to paint Meghan with, it just doesn't make sense.