Meghan Markle: Family and Background - November 2017-May 2018

[Missy-]

Originally Posted by Rudolph

Are you suggesting that Harry ‘knew’ the name of an obscure American actress he ends up proposing to?

Like everything else about the Meghan and Harry love story, there’s lots of holes and inconsistencies.

Even when Meghan dumped Cory for Harry is in dispute depending on which source you believe.

TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Rudolph

The couple are back filling. Because of all the inconsistencies they tried to match stories during the engagement interview. Unfortunately that just created more questions.

Where is the inconsistency in what they’ve said? All the inconsistencies have come from unnamed sources from various tabloids. Which there is a very good explanation as to why. Some didn’t have good sources to begin with. Why do I think that? Because they’ve all backed down from it. Tabloids have taken famous people to task before when they lied and the tabloids knew the sources were good. Remember Katie Nicholl and her story about Harry having a crush on Meghan and ask the friend to introduce them? Well, she has since changed her tune. I could go on, but there really isn’t a need.

[Curryong]

Originally Posted by Marlo

Do you think Meghan knows everything about Harry? Like Henry is his real name, charities, and so on. I don't think so.

I'd certainly say that after nearly two years of dating and almost six months of living in the UK that Meghan would know a great deal about the family she's marrying into and about Harry's charities.

That's more especially so since in the interview the couple said they spent a long time talking about such things as charity work on their first and second dates together. And why would Meghan go on stage with Harry and the Cambridges at the conference on Heads Together if she hadn't studied it?

And she would have been told by Harry that his name was Henry if she didn't know it before. Most people know that Harry is a pet name for Henry.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Missy-

TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.

Ok, give me an example where any of what they’ve said is inconsistent?

There are some of us that paid attention from the very beginning and actually evaluate the reliability of sources. Like Meghan can’t fake tell Piers Morgan she was single in June because she wouldn’t know a year and half later she’d be engaged to Prince Harry.

[Rudolph]

Originally Posted by Missy-

TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.

Lots of people have paid attention. You know that.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Curryong

I'd certainly say that after nearly two years of dating and almost six months of living in the UK that Meghan would know a great deal about the family she's marrying into and about Harry's charities.

That's more especially so since in the interview the couple said they spent a long time talking about such things as charity work on their first and second dates together. And why would Meghan go on stage with Harry and the Cambridges at the conference on Heads Together if she hadn't studied it?

And she would have been told by Harry that his name was Henry if she didn't know it before. Most people know that Harry is a pet name for Henry.

I think Marlo meant when she walked into their blind date.

[O-H Anglophile]

Originally Posted by AlowVera

but most Americans only know Piers because he took over the Larry King Live show .

Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail now.
Since Piers worked for CNN in the US, that would make him acceptable to many people here. CNN is a major news network.

[ACO]

Many people have no idea Harry's real name is Henry. That was made very clear when the engagement was announced and again when the consent was given. I lost track of the "Henry?!" comments especially in American press.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile

Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail.

Honestly, until this relationship and from posters on here, I thought he was a reputable journalist as he had his own show on CNN. But apparently not.

[Marlo]

Originally Posted by jacqui24

Where is the inconsistency in what they’ve said? All the inconsistencies have come from unnamed sources from various tabloids. Which there is a very good explanation as to why. Some didn’t have good sources to begin with. Why do I think that? Because they’ve all backed down from it. Tabloids have taken famous people to task before when they lied and the tabloids knew the sources were good. Remember Katie Nicholl and her story about Harry having a crush on Meghan and ask the friend to introduce them? Well, she has since changed her tune. I could go on, but there really isn’t a need.

Lol, what did Katie say? I never really paid any attention to her.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Marlo

Lol, what did Katie say? I never really paid any attention to her.

She now acts like she never pushed that story in the first place and just reiterate what Harry said in the engagement interview on her book promotions.

Seems that the ones inconsistent here aren’t Meghan and Harry, but the tabloids and their “sources”.

[Curryong]

Originally Posted by jacqui24

I think Marlo meant when she walked into their blind date.

Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.

[Marlo]

Originally Posted by Curryong

Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.

It was a typo.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Curryong

Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.

And just to add, Piers has since admitted that Meghan cut off all contact with him after that. So I would assume he has no motivation in lying for her.

[Osipi]

I learned a long time ago not to take anything that Katie Nicholl says seriously as fact. She has, on many occasions, alluded to "knowing" things that she couldn't possibly know as fact. One case being that after Willam and Kate got back togeter, on vacation in a intimate setting, they vowed that they would one day marry. Now... unless Nicholl was there, how the heck would she know this?

Prime example of a tabloid writer with a vivid imagination for spinning webs of deceit. Truth be known, I don't take as fact anything that is printed in a tabloid. Ever.

[ACO]

Katie was on one of those documentaries saying Harry had a crush on Rachel Zane and she was his dream women per a source. She full of it. Now she on a PR tour promoting this bad book of hers. She was on some American shows and just spewing nonsense.

[Osipi]

Originally Posted by Marlo

It was a typo.

Welcome to my world. I've been the Queen of Typos since 1990.

[AlowVera]

Originally Posted by ACO

Katie was on one of those documentaries saying Harry had a crush on Rachel Zane and she was his dream women per a source. She full of it. Now she on a PR tour promoting this bad book of hers. She was on some American shows and just spewing nonsense.

Funny how its ok for the man to chase after the woman in order to meet her but not for the woman.

Originally Posted by jacqui24

And just to add, Piers has since admitted that Meghan cut off all contact with him after that. So I would assume he has no motivation in lying for her.

We know what a major drama queen Piers is, if MM had mention Harry's name it would have been in the news the next day.

[Curryong]

Originally Posted by Marlo

It was a typo.

Don't I know about those!

[AlowVera]

Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile

Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail now.
Since Piers worked for CNN in the US, that would make him acceptable to many people here. CNN is a major news network.

Yes I was following MM and Piers during the time before she met Harry so I remember Piers being extremely pro- gun reform which gained him alot of attention in America. Piers tweeted with other members of the Suits cast in addition to Meghan. Piers confirms the timeline. He inadvertently also confirms that MM knows very little about the current royal family given how his newspaper was involved in bugging Harry's phone.