The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1441  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:20 PM
Missy-'s Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Are you suggesting that Harry ‘knew’ the name of an obscure American actress he ends up proposing to?

Like everything else about the Meghan and Harry love story, there’s lots of holes and inconsistencies.

Even when Meghan dumped Cory for Harry is in dispute depending on which source you believe.
TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.
__________________

  #1442  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:21 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
The couple are back filling. Because of all the inconsistencies they tried to match stories during the engagement interview. Unfortunately that just created more questions.
Where is the inconsistency in what they’ve said? All the inconsistencies have come from unnamed sources from various tabloids. Which there is a very good explanation as to why. Some didn’t have good sources to begin with. Why do I think that? Because they’ve all backed down from it. Tabloids have taken famous people to task before when they lied and the tabloids knew the sources were good. Remember Katie Nicholl and her story about Harry having a crush on Meghan and ask the friend to introduce them? Well, she has since changed her tune. I could go on, but there really isn’t a need.
__________________

  #1443  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:21 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlo View Post
Do you think Meghan knows everything about Harry? Like Henry is his real name, charities, and so on. I don't think so.
I'd certainly say that after nearly two years of dating and almost six months of living in the UK that Meghan would know a great deal about the family she's marrying into and about Harry's charities.

That's more especially so since in the interview the couple said they spent a long time talking about such things as charity work on their first and second dates together. And why would Meghan go on stage with Harry and the Cambridges at the conference on Heads Together if she hadn't studied it?

And she would have been told by Harry that his name was Henry if she didn't know it before. Most people know that Harry is a pet name for Henry.
  #1444  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:21 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy- View Post
TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.
Ok, give me an example where any of what they’ve said is inconsistent?

There are some of us that paid attention from the very beginning and actually evaluate the reliability of sources. Like Meghan can’t fake tell Piers Morgan she was single in June because she wouldn’t know a year and half later she’d be engaged to Prince Harry.
  #1445  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:22 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy- View Post
TRUTH!

Some of us paid attention from the beginning, there have always been inconsistencies from day one with these two.
Lots of people have paid attention. You know that.
  #1446  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:22 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
I'd certainly say that after nearly two years of dating and almost six months of living in the UK that Meghan would know a great deal about the family she's marrying into and about Harry's charities.

That's more especially so since in the interview the couple said they spent a long time talking about such things as charity work on their first and second dates together. And why would Meghan go on stage with Harry and the Cambridges at the conference on Heads Together if she hadn't studied it?

And she would have been told by Harry that his name was Henry if she didn't know it before. Most people know that Harry is a pet name for Henry.
I think Marlo meant when she walked into their blind date.
  #1447  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:22 PM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlowVera View Post
but most Americans only know Piers because he took over the Larry King Live show .
Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail now.
Since Piers worked for CNN in the US, that would make him acceptable to many people here. CNN is a major news network.
  #1448  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:26 PM
ACO ACO is online now
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,581
Many people have no idea Harry's real name is Henry. That was made very clear when the engagement was announced and again when the consent was given. I lost track of the "Henry?!" comments especially in American press.
  #1449  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:27 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail.
Honestly, until this relationship and from posters on here, I thought he was a reputable journalist as he had his own show on CNN. But apparently not.
  #1450  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:28 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
Where is the inconsistency in what they’ve said? All the inconsistencies have come from unnamed sources from various tabloids. Which there is a very good explanation as to why. Some didn’t have good sources to begin with. Why do I think that? Because they’ve all backed down from it. Tabloids have taken famous people to task before when they lied and the tabloids knew the sources were good. Remember Katie Nicholl and her story about Harry having a crush on Meghan and ask the friend to introduce them? Well, she has since changed her tune. I could go on, but there really isn’t a need.
Lol, what did Katie say? I never really paid any attention to her.
  #1451  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:32 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlo View Post
Lol, what did Katie say? I never really paid any attention to her.
She now acts like she never pushed that story in the first place and just reiterate what Harry said in the engagement interview on her book promotions.

Seems that the ones inconsistent here aren’t Meghan and Harry, but the tabloids and their “sources”.
  #1452  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:32 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
I think Marlo meant when she walked into their blind date.
Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.
  #1453  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:36 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.
It was a typo.
  #1454  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:38 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Well, Marlo's post said 'knows' not 'knew' as in 2016.

When Piers Morgan met Meghan in London on Wimbledon week, she stated quite clearly to him that she was a single woman/free agent. At the time Piers first started running off at the mouth in print about Meghan she was just a girlfriend of Harry's, not a future wife. He boasted that he knew her, yes, but he had no reason to lie about the content of their conversation.
And just to add, Piers has since admitted that Meghan cut off all contact with him after that. So I would assume he has no motivation in lying for her.
  #1455  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:39 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,278
I learned a long time ago not to take anything that Katie Nicholl says seriously as fact. She has, on many occasions, alluded to "knowing" things that she couldn't possibly know as fact. One case being that after Willam and Kate got back togeter, on vacation in a intimate setting, they vowed that they would one day marry. Now... unless Nicholl was there, how the heck would she know this?

Prime example of a tabloid writer with a vivid imagination for spinning webs of deceit. Truth be known, I don't take as fact anything that is printed in a tabloid. Ever.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #1456  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:39 PM
ACO ACO is online now
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,581
Katie was on one of those documentaries saying Harry had a crush on Rachel Zane and she was his dream women per a source. She full of it. Now she on a PR tour promoting this bad book of hers. She was on some American shows and just spewing nonsense.
  #1457  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:42 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlo View Post
It was a typo.
Welcome to my world. I've been the Queen of Typos since 1990.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #1458  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:50 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
Katie was on one of those documentaries saying Harry had a crush on Rachel Zane and she was his dream women per a source. She full of it. Now she on a PR tour promoting this bad book of hers. She was on some American shows and just spewing nonsense.

Funny how its ok for the man to chase after the woman in order to meet her but not for the woman.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
And just to add, Piers has since admitted that Meghan cut off all contact with him after that. So I would assume he has no motivation in lying for her.

We know what a major drama queen Piers is, if MM had mention Harry's name it would have been in the news the next day.
  #1459  
Old 04-07-2018, 09:59 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlo View Post
It was a typo.
Don't I know about those!
  #1460  
Old 04-07-2018, 10:09 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 894
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
Until fairly recently that is all I knew about Piers. I still don't know much more other than he apparently works for the Daily Mail now.
Since Piers worked for CNN in the US, that would make him acceptable to many people here. CNN is a major news network.
Yes I was following MM and Piers during the time before she met Harry so I remember Piers being extremely pro- gun reform which gained him alot of attention in America. Piers tweeted with other members of the Suits cast in addition to Meghan. Piers confirms the timeline. He inadvertently also confirms that MM knows very little about the current royal family given how his newspaper was involved in bugging Harry's phone.
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
kate middleton, meghan markle, royal family


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Current Events 1: November 2017 - May 2018 soapstar Current Events Archive 832 05-20-2018 06:28 AM
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, General News 1: November 2017 - May 2018 Cocoasneeze Current Events Archive 1431 05-20-2018 06:25 AM
Meghan Markle's Fashion and Style Part 1: November 2017 - May 2018 JessRulz Archives 2048 05-19-2018 03:22 AM




Popular Tags
america american history ancestry archie mountbatten-windsor background story baptism biography britain british british royal family brownbitcoinqueen camilla china chinese commonwealth countries countess of snowdon customs daisy doge of venice doll dubai duke of sussex family life family tree fashion and style george vi gustaf vi adolf hello! highgrove house of windsor imperial household italian royal family jack brooksbank jacobite japan jewellery king edward vii king willem-alexander książ castle line of succession list of rulers luxembourg mary: crown princess of denmark meghan markle monarchy nepalese royal jewels plantinum jubilee prince constantijn prince dimitri princess alexia (2005 -) princess catharina-amalia princess chulabhorn walailak princess ribha queen consort queen mathilde queen maxima royal ancestry royal jewels serbian royal family solomon j solomon speech sussex suthida swedish queen taiwan tradition uae customs united states of america welsh wittelsbach


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×