 |
|

05-19-2018, 02:42 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
I don't think any of us here really ever expected Tom Sr. to be graced with a Coat of Arms.
In fact, I would begin to think that the Queen was a tad bit off her rocker had she granted him one.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-19-2018, 04:47 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Verseau
|
Tom Markle was never going to get a Coat of Arms. The Daily Mail is not a reliable source and they prefer to twist stories for the most negativity.
|

05-19-2018, 10:27 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
|
|
Has Meghan's CoA been announced?
|

05-19-2018, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
It will probably not be seen until Harry and Meghan's conjoined coat of arms is released. If I'm not mistaken, it was quite a while after W&K's wedding when their conjoined coat of arms went public.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-19-2018, 10:44 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Beautiful PNW, United States
Posts: 526
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
It will probably not be seen until Harry and Meghan's conjoined coat of arms is released. If I'm not mistaken, it was quite a while after W&K's wedding when their conjoined coat of arms went public.
|
Thank you, Osipi!
|

05-20-2018, 04:37 AM
|
 |
Former Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,875
|
|
And I think it wasn't until November 2012 that an official image of Catherine's individual arms as William's wife was released. There wasn't as much mystery since almost all of it was already known (the arms of her father and husband were already known), but one of the supporters was a surprise.
|

05-20-2018, 05:17 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 282
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbenson
And I think it wasn't until November 2012 that an official image of Catherine's individual arms as William's wife was released. There wasn't as much mystery since almost all of it was already known (the arms of her father and husband were already known), but one of the supporters was a surprise.
|
Her individual arm as the daughter of Michael Middelton was known since it was on the back of the official wedding programme
http://www.toledoblade.com/image/201...ng-Program.JPG
|

05-20-2018, 05:22 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,570
|
|
Hopefully Meghan will get a new Coat of Arms of her own and it will be unveiled in the next few weeks.
|

05-20-2018, 10:55 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 48
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missy-
Has Meghan's CoA been announced?
|
I am not sure what the delay is in the announcement of the Duchess of Sussex's new coat of arms. The Middleton Arms (granted to Michael Middleton for the benefit of the Duchess of Cambridge) were announced in advance of the wedding in April 2011. See this link.
https://www.royal.uk/new-coat-arms-m...and-her-family
And the Cambridge conjoined arms were announced in September 2013, view this link.
https://www.royal.uk/new-conjugal-co...hess-cambridge
I am hopeful that the College of Arms is currently working on a design for the Duchess. Perhaps it will be another gift from HM QEII in the coming days or weeks?
|

05-20-2018, 11:00 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Perhaps its a wise step to not present The Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms until after she actually is The Duchess of Sussex.
This way, with it not being granted to "Meghan Markle", it quashes any possibility that other "Markles" could lay claim to using it.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-20-2018, 11:02 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Lewisville, United States
Posts: 1,046
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
Perhaps its a wise step to not present The Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms until after she actually is The Duchess of Sussex.
This way, with it not being granted to "Meghan Markle", it quashes any possibility that other "Markles" could lay claim to using it. 
|
Good point.
|

05-20-2018, 11:06 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 48
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
Perhaps its a wise step to not present The Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms until after she actually is The Duchess of Sussex.
This way, with it not being granted to "Meghan Markle", it quashes any possibility that other "Markles" could lay claim to using it. 
|
I like that thought. It's possible that the pre-wedding drama of the Markel family caused some last minute changes to the thinking of the Arms grant, just as it did to the wedding ceremony, and will be announced soon???
|

05-20-2018, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,784
|
|
@Osipi - good point for delaying the C of A. KP could announce the C of A is a wedding gift and leave it at that. Or use the Duchess of Gloucester precedent. The media will bring up how fathers of royal brides are conferred Coats of Arms, bring up all the Markle messes and draw the conclusion their behavior is the reason why they will not get a family C of A.
|

05-20-2018, 04:00 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
The media would be totally wrong in stating that all fathers of royal brides are given a coat of arms. The fathers of royal brides that actually have/had coat of arms was solely because they qualified for one, applied for it and it was granted.
Being a royal bride has nothing to do with it.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-20-2018, 04:33 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,515
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
The media would be totally wrong in stating that all fathers of royal brides are given a coat of arms. The fathers of royal brides that actually have/had coat of arms was solely because they qualified for one, applied for it and it was granted.
Being a royal bride has nothing to do with it. 
|
And in the past the father was either royal or aristocratic himself and already had a coat of arms!
|

05-20-2018, 05:31 PM
|
 |
Moderator Emeritus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
The media would be totally wrong in stating that all fathers of royal brides are given a coat of arms. The fathers of royal brides that actually have/had coat of arms was solely because they qualified for one, applied for it and it was granted.
Being a royal bride has nothing to do with it. 
|
This!
Tom Markle Sr does not qualify for a coat of arms. He's not a British citizen, nor a citizen of a Commonwealth country that the Queen is not head of state of and has a national heraldic authority. Therefore, no arms for him. See here for the UK College of Arms' statement on the Granting of Arms. As a US citizen, Sr is at best able to receive an honourary coat of arms, but that's not exactly the same.
Personally, I'm just hoping that marriage is enough to grant Meghan her own arms (or arms conjoined with her husband's), and that we don't have to wait until she is a UK citizen herself to get them.
|

05-20-2018, 07:20 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 789
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
Perhaps its a wise step to not present The Duchess of Sussex's coat of arms until after she actually is The Duchess of Sussex.
This way, with it not being granted to "Meghan Markle", it quashes any possibility that other "Markles" could lay claim to using it. 
|
When does Meghan become the Duchess of Sussex; I thought that happened on her wedding day?
|

05-20-2018, 07:21 PM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Bellevue, United States
Posts: 1,515
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fijiro
When does Meghan become the Duchess of Sussex; I thought that happened on her wedding day?
|
Yes, the Queen created Harry Duke of Sussex the morning of the wedding so Meghan became the Duchess the moment she became his wife.
|

05-23-2018, 11:04 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 282
|
|
And what about her royal Cypher (Monogram). How will it look like? Will she go with R for Rachel or M for Meghan with the coronet?
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|