A nice article about the Spencers:
Prince Harry is inviting Diana's entire Spencer family to his wedding | Daily Mail Online
Prince Harry is inviting Diana's entire Spencer family to his wedding | Daily Mail Online
A nice article about the Spencers:
Prince Harry is inviting Diana's entire Spencer family to his wedding | Daily Mail Online
Are the royals supposed to be close to the prime minister? Wouldn't that be called too political? I mean, Meghan's friend's in-laws were considered to be too political for that friend to be her bridal girl/woman, but now Harry is supposed to be tight with the prime minister?
I think it’s only Edward and Harry who will have no government or Commonwealth representatives at their wedding. I’m pretty sure Princess Anne had them at her first wedding.
I know the Spencers will be at Harry's wedding but what about Diana's maternal family, the Fermoys? Diana's first cousin Lord Fermoy attended William's wedding. Does anyone know if her aunt Mary Roche was there?
Yes she was but she's well into her 90s now, so don't know if she's in good health. If she is I'm sure she will attend.
Would you invite all your greataunts and second cousins? They have a limited number of seats, so unless they are in touch regularly I don't see why Harry would feel the need to invite anyone else than his aunts, uncles and cousins on the Spencer side. It's not a large wedding like William's in which people were invited the couple had no relationship with at all, so a more extended invitation to his mother's family was in order.
Yes she was but she's well into her 90s now, so don't know if she's in good health. If she is I'm sure she will attend.
Would you invite all your greataunts and second cousins? They have a limited number of seats, so unless they are in touch regularly I don't see why Harry would feel the need to invite anyone else than his aunts, uncles and cousins on the Spencer side. It's not a large wedding like William's in which people were invited the couple had no relationship with at all, so a more extended invitation to his mother's family was in order.
A nice article about the Spencers:
Prince Harry is inviting Diana's entire Spencer family to his wedding | Daily Mail Online
At least this time, Lady Kitty Spencer will be photographed and not at a fashion show. Brings up another thought. Perhaps little Charlotte Diana Spencer will be part of the wedding party. Has she been suggested yet? She's over 5 years old. I think it would be nice to include her.
Would you invite all your greataunts and second cousins? They have a limited number of seats, so unless they are in touch regularly I don't see why Harry would feel the need to invite anyone else than his aunts, uncles and cousins on the Spencer side. It's not a large wedding like William's in which people were invited the couple had no relationship with at all, so a more extended invitation to his mother's family was in order.
Hard to say for other families. If they have Spencer/Roche family gatherings or stay in contact other ways, yes.
My niece is getting married in October. There will be a number of her great aunts and uncles and second cousins attending. And they are not inviting 600 guests.
If Meghan's immediate family is NOT attending it would be even weirder to invite far relatives of his side that they hardly know...I'm not married but yes, my siblings invited my great-aunts and uncles to their weddings.
Inviting extended family members is a nice way of honoring that side of the family, whether you have a close relationship with them or not. I'm sure Lady Anne Wake-Walker, who probably barely knows William and Harry, felt a great deal of Spencer pride when she attended William's wedding. By including the Fermoys, William also honored his deceased grandmother Frances Shand Kydd.
Yes, Harry's wedding will be smaller, but I hardly think reserving two seats for a couple of elderly great-aunts would be that difficult. Especially when you consider the fact that very few of Meghan's relatives will be there.
If Meghan's immediate family is NOT attending it would be even weirder to invite far relatives of his side that they hardly know...
If they 'only' invite his uncles, aunts and cousins they number of Spencer family members (21 adults) might already exceed Meghan's total number of family members (and that is without his paternal family):
1 & 2: Lady Sarah & Neil McCorquodale
3 & 4: Emily Jane & James Hutt
5 & 6: George Edmund & Bianca McCorquodale
7 & 8: Celia Rose McCorquodale & fiancé George Woodhouse
9 & 10: Lady Jane & Baron Robert Fellowes
11 & 12: The Hon. Mrs. Laura Jane & Nick Pettman
13 & 14: The Hon. & The Hon. Mrs. Alexander Robert Fellowes
15: The Hon. Eleanor Ruth Fellowes
16 & 17: The Earl & Countess Spencer
18: Lady Kitty Eleanor Spencer
19: Lady Eliza Victoria Spencer
20: Lady Katya Amelia Spencer
21: Viscount Althorp
If Meghan's immediate family is NOT attending it would be even weirder to invite far relatives of his side that they hardly know...
If they 'only' invite his uncles, aunts and cousins they number of Spencer family members (21 adults) might already exceed Meghan's total number of family members (and that is without his paternal family):
1 & 2: Lady Sarah & Neil McCorquodale
3 & 4: Emily Jane & James Hutt
5 & 6: George Edmund & Bianca McCorquodale
7 & 8: Celia Rose McCorquodale & fiancé George Woodhouse
9 & 10: Lady Jane & Baron Robert Fellowes
11 & 12: The Hon. Mrs. Laura Jane & Nick Pettman
13 & 14: The Hon. & The Hon. Mrs. Alexander Robert Fellowes
15: The Hon. Eleanor Ruth Fellowes
16 & 17: The Earl & Countess Spencer
18: Lady Kitty Eleanor Spencer
19: Lady Eliza Victoria Spencer
20: Lady Katya Amelia Spencer
21: Viscount Althorp
Of course, the royal family is larger. However, the argument was: "Meghan's side of the family is small, so let's add more very distant members of Harry's maternal family that he doesn't really know", that's what doesn't make sense to me...Its a given, in any wedding in the BRF, the BRF side is going to have more family.
BRF and Spencers:
Wales-4 adults
Anne-6 adults
Yorks-4 adults
Wessex-4 as I think James will be old enough to come
Queen and Philip-2
Kents-20 (up to 25 is Lady Helen's kids come, didn't to Cambridge) and Ella's boyfriend
Gloucesters- 8 adults
Margarets family- 7 possibly 8, depending on if Serena gets invited due to divorce
Spencers-21 adults
so 76 (up to 80 depending on younger members who may be invited).
On Meghan's side:
-Dad
-Mom
-Ashleigh Hale
-Christopher
Maybe some extended family, we don't know how close she is to any of them. All her grandparents are deceased, but she has aunts and uncles. But as far as we know there could only be 4 on her side.
Even Kate, who has a larger family then Meghan, only had 22 family members. More then Meghan but certainly not even a drop of the Windsor list.
She has more in common with Sophie then the wedding venue and private. Beyond her parents Sophie had her brother and sister in law. And actor Thane Bettany who is not only her godfather but also her step-uncle.
Not everybody had a large nuclear family or comes from a large family. Meghan herself doesn’t because she describes herself as an only child and Harry intimated as much with his “....family she never had” comment. And she is after all the ONLY child her parents had together. I think it’s safe to say her parents will of course attend the wedding, well I’m certain Doria will as she was there with Meghan at her first one. I think some extended family/relatives she maintains familial ties with or those she at least considers to be part of her wider family will also be invited.
Its a given, in any wedding in the BRF, the BRF side is going to have more family.
BRF and Spencers:
Wales-4 adults
Anne-6 adults
Yorks-4 adults
Wessex-4 as I think James will be old enough to come
Queen and Philip-2
Kents-20 (up to 25 is Lady Helen's kids come, didn't to Cambridge) and Ella's boyfriend
Gloucesters- 8 adults
Margarets family- 7 possibly 8, depending on if Serena gets invited due to divorce
Spencers-21 adults
so 76 (up to 80 depending on younger members who may be invited).
On Meghan's side:
-Dad
-Mom
-Ashleigh Hale
-Christopher
Maybe some extended family, we don't know how close she is to any of them. All her grandparents are deceased, but she has aunts and uncles. But as far as we know there could only be 4 on her side.
Even Kate, who has a larger family then Meghan, only had 22 family members. More then Meghan but certainly not even a drop of the Windsor list.
She has more in common with Sophie then the wedding venue and private. Beyond her parents Sophie had her brother and sister in law. And actor Thane Bettany who is not only her godfather but also her step-uncle.
Of course, the royal family is larger. However, the argument was: "Meghan's side of the family is small, so let's add more very distant members of Harry's maternal family that he doesn't really know", that's what doesn't make sense to me...
Of course, the royal family is larger. However, the argument was: "Meghan's side of the family is small, so let's add more very distant members of Harry's maternal family that he doesn't really know", that's what doesn't make sense to me...
Why would it be weird? It is what it is.
But we really don't know what Harry's relationship is with his maternal great aunts, etc. For all we know they all go to Jane's or Sarah's for the weekend sometimes for family reunions.
In the end it doesn't matter, if Harry wanted them invited for whatever reason, they were.
Thanks for the clarification. I'm sure room can be found - especially since no officials have to be invited - if that was the wish of the couple.The argument was this: "Inviting extended family members is a nice way of honoring that side of the family, whether you have a close relationship with them or not."
The statement I made about Meghan's family was simply to reiterate my belief that, however small Harry's wedding will be, finding room for two elderly great-aunts wouldn't be that difficult. I did NOT state it was a reason to invite them.
So, are you sure that she doesn't have several great-aunts and great-uncles and second cousins that she could invite to the wedding; next to all her uncles, aunts and cousins? As that was the suggestion that I was responding to. I don't think it would be logical to do so, especially not if she has no relationship with them but that was suggested for Harry's maternal family, so I'd expect the same treatment for Meghan's.
I think some extended family/relatives she maintains familial ties with or those she at least considers to be part of her wider family will also be invited.
It is weird for the bride not to invite her brother and sister and hardly any cousins, nieces and nephews, and at the same time suggest that the groom should invite relatives in a further degree that he doesn't have a relationship with (either)... because Meghan is (probably) not inviting many family members.
Why would it be logical for Harry to invite relatives he doesn't really know (on his non-royal side) and for Meghan to not invite relatives she doesn't really know? It seems far more logical to me that either they choose to invite lots of relatives even if they don't have a personal relationship with them on both sides OR choose to only invite those whom they personally know (next to those they 'have to' invite as members of the royal family) on both sides.
My point never was that the numbers should be equal.
16 & 17: The Earl & Countess Spencer
18: Lady Kitty Eleanor Spencer
19: Lady Eliza Victoria Spencer
20: Lady Katya Amelia Spencer
21: Viscount Althorp
Of course, the royal family is larger. However, the argument was: "Meghan's side of the family is small, so let's add more very distant members of Harry's maternal family that he doesn't really know", that's what doesn't make sense to me...
What about Edmund & Lara?
@Countessmeout - Samantha’s children weren’t at Meghan’s other wedding and I think it’s a mighty big stretch to think things are going to be any different this time around. But you know what? Have fun thinking things will be different ... Why do you lump Samantha’s children as part of Meghan’s immediate family? Samantha is not a member of Meghan’s immediate family and Meghan does not regard her as such either.