Osipi
Member - in Memoriam
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 17,267
- City
- On the west side of North up from Back
- Country
- United States
Lack of judgement, being badly advised, not understanding the basic role of a second tier royal, not seeking or listening to sage advice from Charles, William or the BP staff, or perhaps just not being very bright: not sure which of these is driving these actions.
Do we actually *know as fact* that H&M willfully did not seek or listen to the advice from those you've mentioned? For all we know, they could have advised Harry and Meghan just how to do all of this and are behind him 100% in these lawsuits. Personally, with the long period mentioned that these lawsuits were "in the works", that advice was not sought or heeded from other senior members of the BRF seems to be preposterous to me.
My thinking is that as this is a personal matter regarding Harry and Meghan, their lawyers and those that are named in lawsuits, the public will only see these claimants statements as the lawsuits, themselves, do not pertain to anyone else in the BRF. Like Thomas Markle is irrelevant to the MoS case, the other members of the BRF are also. They're not going to drag the "Firm" into this.
Just my thoughts from a semi-caffeinated mind. I need more coffee. ?
Last edited: