It is purely a copyright issue in spite of the newspaper group lawyers muddying the waters with stuff about FF and Thomas Markle's statement about hurt feelings 'forcing' him to hand over his daughter's letter to a Sunday tabloid.
The main thing I got from yesterday's proceedings, apart from Mr Markle's motivations, was that, in spite of the 'Palace four's' assertions that they don't wish to take sides, (and personally I have doubts about at least one of them) someone senior in the Royal Household saw fit to have regular communications with the editor of a Sunday tabloid.
Whatever he/she thought of Meghan these actions speak volumes to me about the supposed loyalty and discretion of some in the RH/KP towards both their employers and the position he/she/they held or hold.
The main thing I got from yesterday's proceedings, apart from Mr Markle's motivations, was that, in spite of the 'Palace four's' assertions that they don't wish to take sides, (and personally I have doubts about at least one of them) someone senior in the Royal Household saw fit to have regular communications with the editor of a Sunday tabloid.
Whatever he/she thought of Meghan these actions speak volumes to me about the supposed loyalty and discretion of some in the RH/KP towards both their employers and the position he/she/they held or hold.