MaiaMia_53
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2017
- Messages
- 1,917
- City
- Midwest
- Country
- United States
Oh, sure. Lights on the London Eye. How degrading. Awful. I don't know how we can treat people like that in this country. I mean, it's clear as day how lights are a sign of owning someone. So humiliating.
I mean, I don't know how Catherine and William can continue living after that experience. And they did it three times! I'm sure they're so devasted.
The above is entirely your humorous take, not mine. ?
The lights make no difference in my estimation. But as another poster indicated, the decision is entirely up to those who own and operate the London Eye. It's a joyous occasion, so sure if the lights are lit to celebrate Baby Sussex's birth, it's all good. But again, in my estimation, it's not essential and has nothing to do with varying perceptions and opinions of the baby's status within the royal family.
My comments regarding the public not owning the royals surrounds the obsessive media and public over-analysis of the birth plans, the strange conspiracy theories, and 'sussexstandby' reactions bordering on 'hysteria,' which is a word used by Omid Scobie (and he's there on the Windsor scene).
Last edited: