 |
|

04-24-2019, 01:58 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,961
|
|
You are all real sweetcakes! But it's true - with Meghan pregnant it's a bit as when it was Diana with William (so long ago and I was so young), we all held our breath. While with Catherine and William himself it was more like: duty well done, Ma'am, Sir and off they went.
|

04-24-2019, 02:13 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 310
|
|
Yep, I'm going away next Wednesday for a week or so...that's the time it will come. Always happens!
|

04-24-2019, 02:30 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,376
|
|
I reckon right about now Meghan is relaxed with her feet up most of the time. Doria will have butterflies knowing that babies have their own sense of timing and poor poor Harry must be trying really hard to remain calm and poised and acting normally while instead his insides are even rejecting a Big Mac.
After the babies birth I think he will collapse from exhaustion from putting up a good relaxed front to everyone around him.
Doria will be the voice of reason reassuring Meghan.
|

04-24-2019, 04:57 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Germany/Windsor, United Kingdom
Posts: 14
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hel
The original tweet regarding the leak by the German media was actually by a user named Christin Zi, who tweeted the following:
There was a screenshot in the tweet.
Omid Scobie replied to the thread, stating that the screenshot was an embargoed part of the operational note:
https://twitter.com/scobie/status/1116408928626196480
Christin later posted the following:
|
So you try to proove with saying that somebody has heard something from somebody..... this is anything but serious 😂
Excuse me, but feel reassured that no, absolutely no serious German media would mention details of a baby birth if royal or not, in any way. The German Tv f.e. is funded from tax and far away from sending royal gossip from Uk or anywhere else.
There are of course media like yellow press who like to share speculations and all that silly things, like in Britin or even here in the forum. The sources mentioned above are private twitter accounts and can hardly give proof in a serious scientific manner.
Have a nice day,maybe +1 for Britain? 🙂
|

04-24-2019, 05:30 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,784
|
|
TMZ is reporting Dad is not going to the UK because the BRF has iced him out
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.tmz...aby-mom-doria/
Still blaming others for his poor choices. For three years Dad Jr and Sam have proven they will spill personal and malicious tea for the right price. And for other other gossip about the royals going now they can't be trusted to be quiet and not go to the press to tell what they heard. That also makes them security risks. In response to Lettergate Dad showed a reporter Meghan's phone number as proof of no contact from her. What would prevent him or the sibs from blabbing the security details of Frogmore? Doria is staying at Frogmore because she is discreet. Closed mouths get fed.
|

04-24-2019, 06:12 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Basically all TMZ is reporting is something we already know and take as fact due to poor behavior in the past by these people. Its no great surprise.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

04-24-2019, 06:32 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 665
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andr19
So you try to proove with saying that somebody has heard something from somebody..... this is anything but serious 
Excuse me, but feel reassured that no, absolutely no serious German media would mention details of a baby birth if royal or not, in any way. The German Tv f.e. is funded from tax and far away from sending royal gossip from Uk or anywhere else.
There are of course media like yellow press who like to share speculations and all that silly things, like in Britin or even here in the forum. The sources mentioned above are private twitter accounts and can hardly give proof in a serious scientific manner.
Have a nice day,maybe +1 for Britain? 
|
You asked where it came from. I explained. This isn't science, it's history. Perhaps you should consider that if you continue to meet honest and kind attempts to answer your questions with insulting slap backs, your future questions on this forum are likely to be met with silence or suggestions that you figure it out yourself.
|

04-24-2019, 06:46 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andr19
So you try to proove with saying that somebody has heard something from somebody..... this is anything but serious ��
Excuse me, but feel reassured that no, absolutely no serious German media would mention details of a baby birth if royal or not, in any way. The German Tv f.e. is funded from tax and far away from sending royal gossip from Uk or anywhere else.
There are of course media like yellow press who like to share speculations and all that silly things, like in Britin or even here in the forum. The sources mentioned above are private twitter accounts and can hardly give proof in a serious scientific manner.
Have a nice day,maybe +1 for Britain? ��
|
Believe what you want but the information is accurate and was confirmed by other sources once it was leaked.
The birth of a baby in the immediate BRF is news and not gossip. Many international news agencies are and will report on it. The baby itself is not gossip.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Verseau
TMZ is reporting Dad is not going to the UK because the BRF has iced him out
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.tmz...aby-mom-doria/
Still blaming others for his poor choices. For three years Dad Jr and Sam have proven they will spill personal and malicious tea for the right price. And for other other gossip about the royals going now they can't be trusted to be quiet and not go to the press to tell what they heard. That also makes them security risks. In response to Lettergate Dad showed a reporter Meghan's phone number as proof of no contact from her. What would prevent him or the sibs from blabbing the security details of Frogmore? Doria is staying at Frogmore because she is discreet. Closed mouths get fed.
|
I don’t know why anyone even wants to bother with giving these two any space. Nothing has changed in their attitude or behavior and I’m tired of hearing anything about them.
|

04-24-2019, 07:09 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NYC, United States
Posts: 766
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madame Verseau
TMZ is reporting Dad is not going to the UK because the BRF has iced him out
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.tmz...aby-mom-doria/
Still blaming others for his poor choices. For three years Dad Jr and Sam have proven they will spill personal and malicious tea for the right price. And for other other gossip about the royals going now they can't be trusted to be quiet and not go to the press to tell what they heard. That also makes them security risks. In response to Lettergate Dad showed a reporter Meghan's phone number as proof of no contact from her. What would prevent him or the sibs from blabbing the security details of Frogmore? Doria is staying at Frogmore because she is discreet. Closed mouths get fed.
|
And...water is wet. This lot is way past their expiration date.
|

04-24-2019, 08:05 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Can we please stop bringing anything about Markles unless there is actually new information? Who cares at this point? And no, it does not have anything to do with security risk because it doesn’t even need to get that far in consideration. He’s not there because Meghan doesn’t want him there. And who can blame her.
|

04-24-2019, 08:13 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
I have to agree with you jacqui. Its all ancient history by now and reminds me of an egg salad sandwich that has been left out in very hot weather for three days. Its time for the Markle e(strange)d family to crawl back into the woodwork where they came from.
Its sad that some of her paternal family is so at odds with Meghan but for her own sanity and peace of mind, she's realized that she has to let them go and get on with the positive aspects of her life.
Now... to change the subject....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andr19
So you try to proove with saying that somebody has heard something from somebody..... this is anything but serious
Excuse me, but feel reassured that no, absolutely no serious German media would mention details of a baby birth if royal or not, in any way. The German Tv f.e. is funded from tax and far away from sending royal gossip from Uk or anywhere else.
There are of course media like yellow press who like to share speculations and all that silly things, like in Britin or even here in the forum. The sources mentioned above are private twitter accounts and can hardly give proof in a serious scientific manner.
Have a nice day,maybe +1 for Britain?
|
A press release that is under an embargo is quite a frequent thing. For example, the press will be notified before a royal engagement of what a woman is wearing and the designer and provenance of her jewelry and other interesting facts and with an embargo, the press is asked to not relay any information until said lady steps out in public view at the engagement.
This is what happened with the official information given to the press regarding the birth of Baby Sussex. The information was under an embargo but someone (they say it was German press) inadvertently made the information public rather than heeding the embargo. Its not the first time something like this has happened by any means and most likely could have been an honest mistake.
The official information though is quite valid and has been confirmed by other reporters that had received the same information with the embargo.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

04-24-2019, 08:42 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Mystic, United States
Posts: 11
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
I am going to predict that Baby Sussex will be born on April 25th. Why? I'm always sleeping when the blessed events happens and hits the news and this Thursday I'm going to be totally out of it under anesthesia (simple testing procedure) and will be out of commission for most of the day. Go figure.
|
I'm guessing May 4 for no personal reason, just my gut feeling, and I'm predicting a girl.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alisa
Well to be honest, there is no true way of knowing that. The impression that I got was that the public will not know when the Duchess has gone into labor or when exactly she has given birth. Those things will be kept private....after a reasonable time has passed only then will the public know the Duchess has given birth.
|
UK press has widely reported that they've been told by Buckingham Palace that it will make an announcement when the duchess is in labor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLV
Wasn't George late? I seem to remember William saying something about G keeping them waiting.
|
I got the impression he was just referring to keeping the press waiting, since they had let the press sit out there for 3 weeks by only telling them July and not giving them a better idea of the timing.
|

04-24-2019, 09:00 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Emily Andrews was on Good Morning Britain yesterday and very specifically stated that BP informed the media that they will send them an email when Meghan is in labor. Out of her own mouth. She also said she was under the impression Meghan's due date is this week.
We are all just waiting.
|

04-24-2019, 09:12 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 905
|
|
My niece is due to have her baby girl tomorrow. I have been wondering who will be first! I think it's a girl and going by how big Meghan was last time we saw her I think the baby will be born sooner rather then later.
|

04-24-2019, 09:13 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
We are all just waiting.
|
If we are all anxious and watching various places where the news would be released that Meghan is in labor, imagine how Meghan herself feels about now. Harry has probably not slept for a while as every time Meghan makes a move in her sleep, it may be a signal that its time. Good thing that the grandma-to-be is there to assure Harry that when the time does come, he'll have plenty of time to act according to plan as the baby won't be born with the very first contraction Meghan has and also make him drink some calming tea and not go bonkers because Doria is boiling hot water.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

04-24-2019, 09:17 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Emily Andrews was on Good Morning Britain yesterday and very specifically stated that BP informed the media that they will send them an email when Meghan is in labor. Out of her own mouth. She also said she was under the impression Meghan's due date is this week.
We are all just waiting.
|
If she's due this week, that makes her about 13 weeks along at the time of Eugenie's wedding, so makes sense. Either way, it's any day now. Feel like I've saying that for couple of weeks.
|

04-24-2019, 09:22 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 723
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout
I think I agree with you. I always predict things for my birthday, and they always happen the day before or after. Louis was day before. When my little cousin was born I wanted her on my birthday, was born at 12:06 am the day after. I wont be shocked if it is Thursday. 
|
My little cousin will be 2 on Tuesday, and she was born (by C-section) a mere 12 minutes before her May 1 due date (11:48 PM on April 30th)
|

04-24-2019, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Such Fun
I got the impression he was just referring to keeping the press waiting, since they had let the press sit out there for 3 weeks by only telling them July and not giving them a better idea of the timing.
|
I think it was more than that. I remember several members of the royal family making remarks during that July that seemed to indicate George was late.
At least right now Baby Sussex isn't late yet according to Meghan's late April or May time frame.
|

04-24-2019, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 1,281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathia_sophia
It's officially the 24th now. So, Baby Sussex won't share his/her birthday with cousin Louis.
I confess that I'm starting to feel a bit anxious. I remember we all felt this way with Charlotte, since everyone believed she would be born in April. It was...one more day and...nothing...one more day and...nothing...it was fun and frustrating at the same time.
|
I am too. I am about to have a meltdown.  I am ready for that sweet baby to get here.
|

04-24-2019, 09:53 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24
If she's due this week, that makes her about 13 weeks along at the time of Eugenie's wedding, so makes sense. Either way, it's any day now. Feel like I've saying that for couple of weeks. 
|
Well it will be in the next two weeks. I am hoping by this weekend but Baby Sussex could just as easily be a May baby. Not long now either way.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|