 |
|

04-07-2019, 10:48 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
 I read it. Though it wasn’t clear that you were simply quoting. And like I said, an assertion without evidence. Never mind the fact that all royal births involve more than just two doctors. And considering how the best accommodations can cost. Really don’t think the problem is if she has to pay a fee to a doctor. Sounds like it says more about them than her if a woman choosing her own doctor is a problem for them.
|

04-07-2019, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
I was actually quoting the DM on that one. Please read the full article that was linked, where it is mentioned that the Queen's doctors do not charge a fee whereas Meghan's pick is likely to add "tens of thousands" in extra costs.
|
I would also like to know where the Fail comes up with the statement that the Queen's doctor(s) attend to their patients for free. The good doctor may be on retainer and serve the Queen exclusively but I seriously doubt he does it for free or table scraps. If they're on staff for the Queen, they receive compensation for their services.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

04-07-2019, 10:57 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
I was actually quoting the DM on that one. Please read the full article that was linked, where it is mentioned that the Queen's doctors do not charge a fee whereas Meghan's pick is likely to add "tens of thousands" in extra costs.
|
It sounded liked you were stating fact. Nowhere in your original post did you say you were parroting a DM article. That wasn’t clear to readers despite your intention.
And really, some folks prefer not to read DM articles so they would not understand that without referencing the article.
The Hospitals where other Royal ladies gave birth didn’t provide services for free, nor did the medical staffs. Typical twisting of facts by the DM.
|

04-07-2019, 10:58 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
I would also like to know where the Fail comes up with the statement that the Queen's doctor(s) attend to their patients for free. The good doctor may be on retainer and serve the Queen exclusively but I seriously doubt he does it for free or table scraps. If they're on staff for the Queen, they receive compensation for their services.
|
Apparently they don’t charge the Queen because the prestige means they can charge more for other clients who are not members of the royal family. And I thought this would be frowned upon.
|

04-07-2019, 11:24 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1,014
|
|
Nothing is in vain...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
I would also like to know where the Fail comes up with the statement that the Queen's doctor(s) attend to their patients for free...
|
I think, the "Daily Mail" spoke only about the births, that were conducted for free, the royal births.
And I would like to think, that is true, because it is a good advertisement for a doctor and something to brag about even to your Grandchildren, which then has something to tell at cocktail parties...
It is the same with working as a butler for the Queen: The wage is very low, but it is something for the vitae as a butler, a door opener to later much better paid jobs.
|

04-07-2019, 11:39 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: many places, United States
Posts: 2,082
|
|
As far as the birth, she can just have Harry assist her in her birth, for all I care. Only the Queen and I believe first born son's wife had to have an official to be present [by law] to recognize that the child born was in fact the queen's true child [no mixing with another]. Since Anne, Andrew, Edward and now Harry will never sit on the throne, no big deal. And who really cares.
__________________
Forgiveness is the fragrance the violet shed on the heel that crushed it - Mark Twain Humans invented language to satisfy the need to complain and find fault - Will Rogers
|

04-07-2019, 11:47 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 6,283
|
|
A number of posts have been deleted. Let’s stick to discussing the article and not turn this into another discussion about the media vs Meghan, or Kate vs Meghan. Thanks.
|

04-07-2019, 12:49 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,784
|
|
Doria is expected to be in London before the birth and help out Meghan and Harry for a few weeks and go home
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...ers-birth.html
while Tom Sr plans to welcome Baby Sussex in a non British bar hoisting a beer.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.exp...mas-markle/amp
It's been almost a year since Pap gate and Dad still doesn't get it that embarrassing stunts and gripe interviews will not help him get to see the baby. And begging to be invited to the christening or a family event goes back to Meghan's letter that he wanted a photo op after the pap stunt. Again this is about Sr wanting to look like a big shot to the world and not family unity. If he had followed Doria's example he would see his grandchild in the first hours of life.
|

04-07-2019, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
 Nothing new there. Its also the Fail and the Express bird cage liners so I'll pass it right by.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

04-07-2019, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 13,019
|
|
Daily Fail must be getting desperate and rehashing old news. How many times do they report Doria will be coming over  Shocking news, the grandmother will be there
Of course the 'Doria will push her daughter to have a natural birth' angle.
As for Tom Sr if he actually wanted to see the baby he would shut up. Every time he does these interviews he takes another twenty steps back from having any chance at seeing the baby or his daughter again. Notice he hopes to be invited to the christening, the 'public event'. Not that he just wants to be invited to see the baby.
|

04-07-2019, 07:09 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,184
|
|
I'm 100% sure Dailymail has no clue what Doria plans to do, they're just making a guess, which most of us have done too. Most likely Doria will fly over to UK, but no tabloid knows when and for how long.
As for Sr, everyone knows what he's going to do, because he sings like a canary to every tabloid around.
|

04-07-2019, 08:02 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
The media is following Doria. There have been new pictures of her daily. They even followed her to a clients house. They clearly waiting to see if she leave for London and that is the media's clue that Meghan is close. I wish they would leave her alone.
|

04-07-2019, 08:17 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 13,019
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
The media is following Doria. There have been new pictures of her daily. They even followed her to a clients house. They clearly waiting to see if she leave for London and that is the media's clue that Meghan is close. I wish they would leave her alone.
|
Becoming ridiculous. One of the worst, the 'headed to Windsor castle for appointments' title.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Castle-LA.html
|

04-07-2019, 09:31 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Whilst I get that the media has little respect for Doria's privacy to make a buck, there still some lines that should be respected. Given her line of work, her patients do deserve privacy and not have their community name be photographed or published like this.
|

04-07-2019, 10:42 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: many places, United States
Posts: 2,082
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
The media is following Doria. There have been new pictures of her daily. They even followed her to a clients house. They clearly waiting to see if she leave for London and that is the media's clue that Meghan is close. I wish they would leave her alone.
|
Yes, that is 100% stalking. I don't care who is doing it, stalking is illegal. Why isn't it stopped by officials in California. Wimps
__________________
Forgiveness is the fragrance the violet shed on the heel that crushed it - Mark Twain Humans invented language to satisfy the need to complain and find fault - Will Rogers
|

04-08-2019, 01:43 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 981
|
|
The expectation of being seen to go home, while puting some pressure on the parents, doesn't have to include looking perfectly made up or showing more of the baby than the parents wish to expose.
The parents wearing casual and comfortable clothing would be totally acceptable. they have to go home anyway so why not have a photo and then relax into parenting for weeks to come. It takes some pressure off in that respect.
The press are happy and then leave them to get on with it.
And the choice of when to go home (have the photo) is totally up to the couple.
The choice of whether to present for the press is totally up to the couple too.
I, personally, think Meghan and Harry will be on the steps because they will enjoy it.
|

04-08-2019, 01:10 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
I suspect Meghan and Harry will just been seen with the baby in the carrier as they exit the hospital and go to their car. No posing for the flashes. And honestly, why do they have to? They are the 6th in line and his wife. This baby will not be an HRH. People can't have it both ways in saying they are not important while complaining over them not doing something like posing with the baby.
Personally they have set up their IG account. Just post a picture a few days after getting settled at home. People will ooh and ahh over it and all will be fine. The press will never be happy. They will continue to attack them regardless so if that is the incentive then it is hardly worth it. They should do what is best for them.
|

04-08-2019, 06:07 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
|
|
Personally, provided it is healthy that is the beginning and end of my interest in it..
|

04-08-2019, 06:08 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 10,477
|
|
Couldn't agree more.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|

04-08-2019, 06:16 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1,014
|
|
Me thinks, Baby Sussex will later not even get an "Apanage", some money from the royal coffers. Or get for example the Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice some? I only remember, that there was some trouble between Charles and Edward about this question...
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|