 |
|

01-12-2019, 12:15 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 13,030
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG
As a baby Meghan will have lots of fun whether it's a boy or girl and if they are at Windsor the baby might get to ride in the Rolls Royce of prams. Nice, no shuddering shaking about, just floating along.
But don't forget the child will need to feel like the kids he or she is going to be surrounded by. School means uniform as young as four here in private schools so if they have a boy it would need to be used to short pants.
|
Many kids wear school uniforms. They are just that, School uniforms. Many girls had to wear plaid skirts and knee socks to school. Doesn't mean they wore them outside of school to get 'used to wearing them'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale
Presumably without interesting colour or prints
and of foreign 'make'...
|
Like the Spanish brand Kate enjoys using pethaps for her kids.....
Don't worry the thing you detest about Meghan's style will save you from kids in black. Being modern. The whole idea of mommy baby matching looks doesn't really fit her modern aesthetic.
Most people understand the color and style palate for a child is vastly different then that of a thirty something year old woman.
|

01-12-2019, 12:18 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,142
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi
As much as newborns go through clothing in a day and how quickly they grow out of them, I think I'd bet my last chai tea latte that for daily wear at home. there will be plenty of clothing that were worn by George, Charlotte and Louis handed down to the Sussex baby. It just makes sense to me.
Of course, out in public and as the child grows older, that's when individual taste comes in by the parents as to how they dress their children.
|
I am certain that Harry's baby clothes are kept somewhere, just as William's were and that baby Sussex will appear in them as well
|

01-13-2019, 07:09 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,571
|
|
No-one knows the sex of this baby beyond the obstetrician and possibly the parents, so if it's a boy the gamblers lose their money. It's 50/50 either way. Just a way of people who like to gamble amusing themselves.
|

01-13-2019, 07:43 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Didn't they suspend betting on Alexander McQueen for Meghan's wedding dress and Sussexes having twins as well?  Yea, it's amusing, but that's all it is.
|

01-14-2019, 07:07 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
Meghan told a woman in the crowd she was 6 months pregnant and due around April.
So there is that.
|

01-14-2019, 07:12 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LIEGE, Belgium
Posts: 5,583
|
|
Only 6 months ! Incredible ! She is so huge for her frame ! I am convinced it is a girl !
|

01-14-2019, 07:13 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
|
|
Her stomach looks lower today as though it has dropped.
|

01-14-2019, 07:15 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,784
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Meghan told a woman in the crowd she was 6 months pregnant and due around April.
So there is that.
|
If that came out, that puts conception in July.
|

01-14-2019, 07:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,377
|
|
At some point the Sussexes will have to start interviewing nannies, if they haven't already.
|

01-14-2019, 08:08 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Meghan told a woman in the crowd she was 6 months pregnant and due around April.
So there is that.
|
Just read on the Hello website that Meghan said that she's due at the end of April or the beginning of May!
|

01-14-2019, 08:11 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Terri
Just read on the Hello website that Meghan said that she's due at the end of April or the beginning of May!
|
I think Emily Nash overstated that....the other reporter who reported it (first I think) said Meghan told one lady she was 6 months pregnant and another lady she was due around April.
LaRae
|

01-14-2019, 08:12 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
Meghan told a woman in the crowd she was 6 months pregnant and due around April.
So there is that.
|
Where is this reported or confirmed? ETA: Oh I see, Emily Nash's Twitter.
If DoS Meghan is 6-months pregnant, then perhaps mid-April due date.
|

01-14-2019, 08:14 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
That’s one big baby if she’s only 6 months. But then, Meghan and time hasn’t always been accurate in the past.
|

01-14-2019, 08:18 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Schweinfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,722
|
|
Again a chance for me to share my birthday with a royal baby. I would be very happy if the baby will be born on this day.
__________________
I had a dream: Let's connect our thoughts together, than we have a mission, let's connect our feelings together, than we have a mood, let's connect our dreams together, than we have a vision and let's connect our mission, our mood and our vision together than we have a perfect life.
|

01-14-2019, 08:19 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
Per ITV's Chris Ship
"Meghan told Carla Gandy that she was ‘six months’ pregnant which suggested a due date of around April. The Duchess then had a similar conversation with Eileen Ashurst who was standing nearby. She told us that M confirmed she was working on an April birth for her first child."
Meghan also said they don't know the sex and want to be surprised.
|

01-14-2019, 08:29 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 11,964
|
|
We can be sure she is at least in 26th week; at the time of Eugenie's wedding (12 October) she was alreadt past her 12-week scan.
|

01-14-2019, 09:03 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 337
|
|
The numbers seem to be adding up to me this far if she was 12 weeks along at the beginning of the tour then 38-42 weeks would be 4/11/19-5/15/19 for a due date.
Meghan may appear a little bit bigger because she has a small torso and there isn't much room for the baby to go except outward.
|

01-14-2019, 09:12 AM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 6,105
|
|
 I agree and she's quickly losing space there. TBH she's going to find it very challenging to sit and sleep towards the end.
|

01-14-2019, 09:32 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
I remember how big Zara looks when pregnant...I think Meghan is going to go that way too.
LaRae
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|