 |
|

10-22-2018, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 13,050
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7
I heard that announcement, and?? She should stay in Australia and let Harry go to Fiji and Tonga.
Why a doctor encourage the risk?
|
The doctor didn't encourage the risk...he clearly thought there was minimal. There isn't any major cases.
If there was any real concern, the royals would be first to draw her out of trip even without Doctor.
|

10-22-2018, 09:44 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
There was one case of Zika in Fiji in 2017 with no birth defects. None in 2018. The risks are minimal, especially when proper precautions are taken.
|

10-23-2018, 05:53 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 304
|
|
|

10-23-2018, 02:32 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 113
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuliannaVictoria
Yeah, he's definitely hovering. I don't know if you've seen the video of the ANZAC memorial of them coming down the stairs. Harry was walking in a weird sideways fashion, leaning towards Meg descending the stairs. It was almost like he was ready to grab a hold of her if need be.
|
I'm about 99.9% sure he was walking sideways because of the spurs on his boots. I do think he is very attentive to her, especially now in her pregnant state, but in this situation, it was most likely the spurs. In a photo or two, you can see the front of his foot is about halfway off the step, again because of the spurs. I think he is trying not to fall down the stairs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloep
|
I know, right? No way she would have been able to hide her belly on the tour (I think she's about 17-18 weeks along). I also think people on the tour (of the visited countries) would have been disappointed if they came home and immediately announced the pregnancy. This way everyone coming out to see them can join in the baby congratulations and celebrations.
|

10-23-2018, 08:45 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SL, United Kingdom
Posts: 387
|
|
A bit late but my congratulations to both Harry & Meghan, their bundle of joy is a blessing.
|

10-25-2018, 01:03 PM
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Olathe, United States
Posts: 7
|
|
Anyone else thinking this baby is going to be here in the month of February .... my non expert opinion — being 5” and 1/2 inch tall ... my first child I didn’t show until the end of my fifth month towards first part of the sixth month. She is very fit too. That’s a honeymoon baby imo. 2nd or 3rd I could believe showing early not 1st.
|

10-25-2018, 01:06 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South, Portugal
Posts: 3,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princesstully
Anyone else thinking this baby is going to be here in the month of February .... my non expert opinion — being 5” and 1/2 inch tall ... my first child I didn’t show until the end of my fifth month towards first part of the sixth month. She is very fit too. That’s a honeymoon baby imo. 2nd or 3rd I could believe showing early not 1st.
|
February...I think it's too early. But I have a feeling that April is out of a question, I think Baby Sussex will be a March Baby.
__________________
♫A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.♥
|

10-25-2018, 01:07 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
No...they said spring. I don't think they have any reason to fudge that one.
LaRae
|

10-25-2018, 01:08 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Every baby is different. She's due in Spring. Late March due date at the earliest. She's been wearing a diamond stack ring along with Peridot (her birth stone) and Sapphire (Harry's birth stone), so the speculation is April. Although, with the first one you just never know.
|

10-25-2018, 01:10 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 1,306
|
|
It would be awesome if the Sussex baby was born on the same April date as Prince Louis.
|

10-25-2018, 01:12 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,614
|
|
Its sometimes hard to tell from photographs. In some clothing she's not showing much at all, in others a bit more. For all three of my pregnancies I was short waisted (like Meghan) and showed early. However, she's quite tall and slender normally, which I am not. I'd say it will be a March baby if I had to guess. I will be surprised if the birth occurs into April, but could be wrong!
|

10-25-2018, 01:37 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 375
|
|
Is it possible she’s having twins? I just can’t ahake the feeling they will have twins.
|

10-25-2018, 01:39 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuchessMia
Is it possible she’s having twins? I just can’t ahake the feeling they will have twins.
|
Well, KP is about to get another wave of hate from the press if she is and they lied about it.
|

10-25-2018, 01:42 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
I think if she was having twins they would be being a lot more careful..due to her age and risk factors I don't think she would be doing as much and because of that KP would have to explain why...and really there's no reason not to tell if they are.
LaRae
|

10-25-2018, 02:10 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,018
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24
Well, KP is about to get another wave of hate from the press if she is and they lied about it. 
|
They didn't necessarily lie.
Sometimes people discover later there are two. Happens more than you think. I remember following a couple on YouTube who didn't know she was pregnant with twins and discovered only after she sadly lost one of them only to learn she was still pregnant.
Then we have the case of Charlene, Princess of Monaco they did two announcements. 1st she was pregnant and then a few weeks later that it was twins.
I don't think she is having twins but IF she were it is more of a risk and I can see them waiting a bit longer to announce that until maybe after the tour is done and things are a bit more settled.
|

10-25-2018, 02:31 PM
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Olathe, United States
Posts: 7
|
|
I am still thinking late February or possibly early March.
|

10-25-2018, 02:33 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Feb is not Spring...early March might be considered early Spring...however I think those birthstone rings she wore are worth taking note of.
LaRae
|

10-25-2018, 04:34 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
They didn't necessarily lie.
Sometimes people discover later there are two. Happens more than you think. I remember following a couple on YouTube who didn't know she was pregnant with twins and discovered only after she sadly lost one of them only to learn she was still pregnant.
Then we have the case of Charlene, Princess of Monaco they did two announcements. 1st she was pregnant and then a few weeks later that it was twins.
I don't think she is having twins but IF she were it is more of a risk and I can see them waiting a bit longer to announce that until maybe after the tour is done and things are a bit more settled.
|
I don't know the announcement for Charlene, but KP specifically said "a baby", which means they didn't tell the truth. Whilst it's not impossible that they didn't know, it's highly unlikely.
The ONLY reason I could think of where they'd lie about it is because this is geriatric pregnancy and they want her to be further along before announcing any other details.
|

10-25-2018, 05:09 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 139
|
|
From the moment they announced their wedding date, I instantly thought they'd have a Valentine's Day baby. So I'm calling February 14!
I was married in late June, and got pregnant in mid-July. Our baby arrived in April, and there were plenty of older generation folks counting on their fingers!!
|

10-25-2018, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: the West, United States
Posts: 4,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24
Every baby is different. She's due in Spring. Late March due date at the earliest. She's been wearing a diamond stack ring along with Peridot (her birth stone) and Sapphire (Harry's birth stone), so the speculation is April. Although, with the first one you just never know.
|
Well, they may be changing out that diamond if it is meant to be a reference to the baby  As you say, with the first one, you never know. Could be late March, could be April, could be May. I was always 2 weeks late to the day, and I've know other women who were consistently early. Only the baby knows...
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|