Harry and Meghan Are Expecting, Baby Due Spring 2019

[JuliannaVictoria]

Originally Posted by MARG

It looks like Harry is going to be a compulsive worrier judging by the way he's clucking over Meghan which, while sweet, is going to drive her nuts pretty darned soon . . . . now it's official. I give it to the end of the tour before she 'educates' him.

Yeah, he's definitely hovering. I don't know if you've seen the video of the ANZAC memorial of them coming down the stairs. Harry was walking in a weird sideways fashion, leaning towards Meg descending the stairs. It was almost like he was ready to grab a hold of her if need be.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by JuliannaVictoria

Yeah, he's definitely hovering. I don't know if you've seen the video of the ANZAC memorial of them coming down the stairs. Harry was walking in a weird sideways fashion, leaning towards Meg descending the stairs. It was almost like he was ready to grab a hold of her if need be.

Yea, he was one step behind whoever that was that walked next to him.

Comment from Harry:

Jade Macmillan
‏
Verified account

@JadeMacmillan1
Follow Follow @JadeMacmillan1
More
Prince Harry tells Invictus competitors Meghan is “resting back at home, being pregnant takes its toll” ⁦@abcnews⁩
https://twitter.com/JadeMacmillan1/s...16538971533312

[Pranter]

Originally Posted by JuliannaVictoria

Yeah, he's definitely hovering. I don't know if you've seen the video of the ANZAC memorial of them coming down the stairs. Harry was walking in a weird sideways fashion, leaning towards Meg descending the stairs. It was almost like he was ready to grab a hold of her if need be.

I wonder if Zara's two miscarriages have made him a bit nervous also....she is a big older for a first time mother (even though becoming more common)....I wonder if the heels will disappear at some point or if she will continue wearing them like some of the other ladies we see (including Pippa!)



LaRae

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Pranter

I wonder if Zara's two miscarriages have made him a bit nervous also....she is a big older for a first time mother (even though becoming more common)....I wonder if the heels will disappear at some point or if she will continue wearing them like some of the other ladies we see (including Pippa!)



LaRae

Honestly don't think heels have anything to do with it. Zara was still wearing heels late into her pregnancy with Lena. That is simply a matter of comfort and preference.

[Curryong]

Meghan just has to be sensible and pace herself.

As someone who has flown regularly between Britain and Australia I can confirm that it is a very long long flight that can leave you feeling like death for a couple of days afterwards. I wasn't pregnant when I did it, but sometimes had children in tow. Meghan not being able to sleep has probably prolonged the jet lag effect.

[Pranter]

Originally Posted by jacqui24

Honestly don't think heels have anything to do with it. Zara was still wearing heels late into her pregnancy with Lena. That is simply a matter of comfort and preference.

To do with what?



LaRae

[Sun Lion]

Harry and Meghan are taking over George and Amal's nanny.

Yes, I know this is in the Daily Mail, but that's the only one I really use.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Clooneys.html

And sorry if this is old news - so much is happening with Harry and Meghan, I don't know what's what.

[Biri]

Don't the Clooney children still need a nanny? They are toddlers, still not in a kindergarten age.

[Sun Lion]

Originally Posted by Biri

Don't the Clooney children still need a nanny? They are toddlers, still not in a kindergarten age.

Gosh, never thought of that Biri, but you're right.

[Denville]

Originally Posted by Sun Lion

Gosh, never thought of that Biri, but you're right.

it doesn't mean that their present nanny might not give up the job. There are other nannies in the world, and Im sure that the Clooneys can hire someone else.

[MARG]

The only thing I remember is that Meghan stated long ago that she did not intend to hire a Nanny and would be a hands-on mother. Admittedly that was said pre-royal, but reality would lead one to expect continuity. Is it Norland Nannies that are both minder and bodyguard?

If the Sussexes are going to continue as they did before Harry's marriage, working closely and socialising together not to mention living in the same palace, continuity of childcare standards would definitely be an asset.

[jacqui24]

Originally Posted by Sun Lion

Harry and Meghan are taking over George and Amal's nanny.

Yes, I know this is in the Daily Mail, but that's the only one I really use.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Clooneys.html

And sorry if this is old news - so much is happening with Harry and Meghan, I don't know what's what.

It doesn’t sound like she’s as much a nanny as a parent coach for new parents.

[PrpleCrown]

So, when Harry was walking along at the first event yesterday someone shouted to him "I hope its a girl" and he answers "So do I" then he laughs.

[Madame Verseau]

The choice of nanny for Harry and Meghan is interesting (I know it's the Fail) but there is going to be problems. One, no formal training in Early Childhood Development or degree or going to nanny school. Two, people are not going to be impressed with Hollywood clients. Right or wrong the impression is Hollywood parents let their kids run wild and overindulge them. Finally Nanny Connie is going to get scrubbed by the media. Anything wrong comes back in her past the press will drag her for being unfit to have a hand in raising a successor to the throne.

[Denville]

Originally Posted by MARG

The only thing I remember is that Meghan stated long ago that she did not intend to hire a Nanny and would be a hands-on mother. Admittedly that was said pre-royal, but reality would lead one to expect continuity. Is it Norland Nannies that are both minder and bodyguard?

If the Sussexes are going to continue as they did before Harry's marriage, working closely and socialising together not to mention living in the same palace, continuity of childcare standards would definitely be an asset.

How is she going to be a "hands on" Mother and do royal duties...

[Ista]

Originally Posted by MARG

The only thing I remember is that Meghan stated long ago that she did not intend to hire a Nanny and would be a hands-on mother. Admittedly that was said pre-royal

There is no conceivable way that Meghan and Harry are going to be able to do without a nanny, no matter how hands-on they intend to be. Even if Meghan was still making her living as an actor, she'd still need trusted live-in help. I think it's safe to say that a nanny is in their future.

[Denville]

Originally Posted by Ista

There is no conceivable way that Meghan and Harry are going to be able to do without a nanny, no matter how hands-on they intend to be. Even if Meghan was still making her living as an actor, she'd still need trusted live-in help. I think it's safe to say that a nanny is in their future.

of course not. Unless she had intended to give up acting, when she was in her previous career and have someone to support her, she would have to have some kind of child care assistance.. In her present life, since I think the RF have decided that she's going to be a full time royal worker from the first year, unlike some other royal wives who were able to play into the role, ther'es no way she can have a child without a full time nanny...

[Countessmeout]

All royals, no matter how hands in they are, have help. Plain and simple. It's the reality of their work and schedule. They may try to limit their work when kids are young like Kate, or be home for school holidays like wessexes try, but help is still a reality. A senior royal is never going to be a stay at home parent.

Meghan would have been the same as an actress. She was so dedicated to her charity work and career I don't see her having ever been a stay at home mom.

[Denville]

well apparently she did state that she intended to be a hands on mother and not have a nanny...

[Lumutqueen]

Here's the "So Do I" Video: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...RL-Meghan.html