The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
View Poll Results: Guess the sex of Harry and Meghan's first baby!
Boy 55 29.10%
Girl 105 55.56%
Twins - Boy/Boy 3 1.59%
Twins - Boy/Girl 19 10.05%
Twins - Girl/Girl 7 3.70%
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #541  
Old 03-01-2019, 06:20 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 843
Well, one of my dates for the birth of the first twin has come and gone!

I need a rethink. ...
Baby twins - one born 19th March and the other born 2nd April.

Boy: John Charles Henry Barack
Barry Charles Richard
Girl: Felicity Margaret Rose Doria
Victoria Elizabeth Diana
__________________

  #542  
Old 03-01-2019, 08:41 AM
Elenath's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nuth, Netherlands
Posts: 826
I don't think they'll go too out there, but I'd love a Loïs or a Margot (nod to princess Margaret) for a girl. Leopold for a boy would also be awesome.
__________________

  #543  
Old 03-01-2019, 08:45 AM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
The is certainly a unique idea of twins-born two weeks apart.
I think that is pretty rare.

I don’t think it is twins, but April 2 and April 3 seems more possible than March 19 and April 2.

Today my guess is April 25.
  #544  
Old 03-01-2019, 08:56 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 15,669
If Meghan is slated to participate with @QueensComTrust to mark #IWD2019 (thanks JuliannaVictoria) on March 8th, I seriously doubt her due date and the expected arrival to be imminent at that time.

I'm going to throw my hat in the ring and predict the birth for March 24, 2019. That's four days into the early spring that we were told.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #545  
Old 03-01-2019, 09:06 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NYC, United States
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
If Meghan is slated to participate with @QueensComTrust to mark #IWD2019 (thanks JuliannaVictoria) on March 8th, I seriously doubt her due date and the expected arrival to be imminent at that time.

I'm going to throw my hat in the ring and predict the birth for March 24, 2019. That's four days into the early spring that we were told.
Your due date estimate is close to mine. I'm thinking March 27th. I think the countdown for me will begin after the 21st.
  #546  
Old 03-01-2019, 09:40 AM
Princess Larisa's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: ., Croatia
Posts: 3,677
I’m going to believe Meghan when she says she is due at the end of April and put my guess down for April 24th.

And I can tell you noting is more annoying to a pregnant woman than being 7 months pregnant and strangers coming up to you and saying ‘you must be due very soon, you’re huge’.
  #547  
Old 03-01-2019, 04:52 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 6,248
For a Son: Edwin Andrew Ian

For a Daughter: Adele Cecilia Diana
  #548  
Old 03-01-2019, 06:41 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,195
Based on what Meghan herself has said I'm going to say mid April thru the end of April.


LaRae
  #549  
Old 03-01-2019, 06:43 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 9,418
I am gonna say: In eight weeks
  #550  
Old 03-01-2019, 09:46 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,540
Mid to late April. I hope April 24, a new royal baby to share my birthday

I just hope they don't fall on one of their cousins' birthdays. Have their own day.
  #551  
Old 03-01-2019, 10:30 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,712
I don't want to see an April 1st birthday. Anything from then on to about end of the month is fine by me!
  #552  
Old 03-02-2019, 08:37 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
The Interweb is awash with rumours that the Duchess may be planning to bring up the child as 'Gender fluid'...
I doubt there is an iota of truth in this, but the very suggestion is damaging enough for the vast majority of the public..

'Thank God, William’s children are first in the line of succession', being the general reaction..

https://t.co/3dooMKWIzJ
  #553  
Old 03-02-2019, 08:48 AM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
The Interweb is awash with rumours that the Duchess may be planning to bring up the child as 'Gender fluid'...
I doubt there is an iota of truth in this, but the very suggestion is damaging enough for the vast majority of the public..

'Thank God, Prince William’s children are first in the line of succession', being the general reaction..

https://t.co/3dooMKWIzJ
I saw that in a headline!
I don’t believe it and I think it originated with someone with a story idea since this is a trendy topic. Just jumping on the sensationalist bandwagon of stories about Meghan.
Now if the story was about being gender-neutral I would give it a lot more credence.
  #554  
Old 03-02-2019, 09:14 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 15,669
I also saw the headline and passed it right by. I just don't see Harry and Meghan doing "labels" of any kind when it comes to their children.

While I do believe that any child raised by Harry and Meghan will grow up in a household that sees and treats all people equally for who they are, these are two people bringing a child into the world that they will love no matter what the child's inclinations or interests in life may be. They will see their child as the unique individual that he/she is and do their best to provide a happy and healthy environment for their child.

In this matter, I'm going to swipe a motto from Harry's Invictus Games which I think encapsulates it all. "I AM". That's all that's needed.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
  #555  
Old 03-02-2019, 10:28 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 337
I'm amending my earlier guesses... I originally thought twins but seeing has how Meghan has been traveling late in her pregnancy I'm discarding that. I'm still team girl and I think the baby will be born 4/28.

G. Name: Victoria Diana Jeanette (I also like Caroline Diana Jeanette)
B. Name: Vincent Charles Spencer

As for the gender fluid headlines. I believe Harry and Meghan will raise their child to be his/her authentic self whatever that may end up being.
  #556  
Old 03-02-2019, 11:21 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,540
It seems to stem from the rumor the nursery will be grey and white

Since when is neutral 'gender fluid' Many couples choose not to go with the traditional blue for boy or pink for girl. Especially if you believe that they don't know the gender already of the baby.

I think people see 'fluid' as meaning they are going to call their child an it, and encourage them to choose their sex. I have heard people accuse liberals of raising their children to be trans, and forcing that on their kids. A pile of rubbish. See the outrage that Celine Dion released a gender neutral baby clothes line. This doesn't mean dresses for boys like some people think. Just gender neutral colors and themes. I love that. I wish when buying clothes for my niece I could find a cute outfit in dinosaurs for a little girl. She adores dinosaurs. But it seems all little girls should like princesses or fluffy animals, or unicorns.

I believe there is some truth to this. But not to the ridiculous extreme some press and readers take it to. If they have a daughter I see it as they will allow her to be herself. She wont always have to be in cute dresses, and be in traditional things like ballet, and playing with dolls, unless she wants to. The idea that a toys section in a store shouldn't have a 'girls' section and a boys section, but that kids should be able to choose whatever toy they want.
  #557  
Old 03-02-2019, 11:37 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
...the very suggestion is damaging enough for the vast majority of the public..
https://t.co/3dooMKWIzJ
Well the suggestion is damaging enough to the majority that bother to comment online. Which is not the majority. The majority does not give a bean about the Sussexes. Trolls LOOOOOOOOOOOVE to comment online on the Sussexes.
__________________
"And the tabloid press will be a pain in the ass, as usual." - Royal Norway
  #558  
Old 03-02-2019, 11:38 AM
O-H Anglophile's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 3,638
your last paragraph is also describing gender neutral not gender fluid.

And I just read a denial from “the Palace” about the gender fluid story.
  #559  
Old 03-02-2019, 11:44 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,397
Quote:
your last paragraph
It's not MY article.. I merely posted it !
  #560  
Old 03-02-2019, 11:48 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,540
Wyevale OH was referring to my post (or I assume) and my last paragraph. Not about the article you posted. If someone hadn't posted quicker then OH, the arrows in their post would have been pointing at my response.

Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
your last paragraph is also describing gender neutral not gender fluid.

And I just read a denial from “the Palace” about the gender fluid story.
Yes. But a lot of people seem to get the terms mixed up. It seems a lot of people take 'gender neutral' as to mean fluid. That saying you are not going to dress your kids in stereotypical colors, and allow them to play with any toy, means you will encourage them to choose their gender. As we see, this story of gender fluid has stemmed from a 'gender neutral' nursery.

Unfortunately there is a very alive backlash against what some people call the 'liberalist attack' on society.

Meghan is a feminist, so of course she will allow her kids to be cross-dressers and will call them IT to promote her agenda All because she doesn't want a blue or pink nursery.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gender & Names for Kate & William's 3rd Child wymanda The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Family 1329 04-27-2018 12:57 PM
Gender, Name and Godparent Speculation for Mary's Second Pregnancy Zonk Crown Prince Frederik, Crown Princess Mary and Family 1185 07-01-2007 07:00 AM
Gender, Name and Godparent Speculation for Mary's First Pregnancy Jasl Crown Prince Frederik, Crown Princess Mary and Family 443 01-21-2006 06:47 AM




Popular Tags
abu dhabi american history anastasia anastasia once upon a time ancestry armstrong-jones baby names baptism biography british royal family brownbitcoinqueen carolin cht cpr duchess of sussex duke of sussex earl of snowdon family tree games general news thread george vi gradenigo haakon vii history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs imperial household interesting jacobite japan jewellery jewelry jumma kids movie list of rulers luxembourg mailing maxima monarchy mountbatten nepal nepalese royal family pless princess alexia (2005 -) princess chulabhorn princess elizabeth princess eugenie princess laurentien princess of orange princess ribha queen elizabeth ii queen maud resusci anne royal balls royal events royal family royal jewels royal spouse royalty royalty of taiwan royal wedding russian court dress spain sussex swedish queen thai royal family unsubscribe videos wedding gown


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×