View Poll Results: Guess the sex of Harry and Meghan's first baby!
|
Boy
|
  
|
55 |
29.10% |
Girl
|
  
|
105 |
55.56% |
Twins - Boy/Boy
|
  
|
3 |
1.59% |
Twins - Boy/Girl
|
  
|
19 |
10.05% |
Twins - Girl/Girl
|
  
|
7 |
3.70% |
 |
|

11-12-2018, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: West Coast, United States
Posts: 241
|
|
I know quite a few people wishing for twins more for the novelty than anything else. I did wonder whether Harry stumbling over his words during his arrival speech at the Australia GG's house had greater meaning. "...whether it be a boy or a girl" Further confirmation of his preference for a girl? An attempt to belie the fact that they know the baby's sex? Or a nod to the idea that if it's twins they could have both?
I personally think it's a boy but boy/girl twins would be fun. Very fitting for a couple that's breaking the mold in so many other ways.
|

11-13-2018, 12:57 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon, United States
Posts: 949
|
|
I'm thinking just one baby and, like the Cambridges, just 3 names. It's more likely that they'll use a nickname or the 2nd or 3rd name as the child's given name than it is they'll have 4 names for this one, IMO.
I could see them going slightly outside of the traditional box, especially if the intent is these children will not ever be HRHs (I know, that's a discussion for another thread, lol). They won't stray as far outside the traditional box as the Phillips or Tindall kids or the more extended Gloucester or Kent broods - something along the lines of Alexander or Caroline, possibly a David or an Eleanor. And nothing that's going be a repeat of a name currently used within the immediate family - so no Andrew, Edward, James, Louise, Sophie, Anne, etc. I do think, if this wee one is a girl, she will have, as Charlotte does, Diana as one of her middle names.
My best guesses:
Alexander Charles David
Caroline Diana Jeanette
|

11-13-2018, 01:00 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 310
|
|
Ok I'm going for - Harriet Elizabeth Diana - or - Harriet Diana Doria - for a girl. Another Harri would be so cute. Still working on the boys.
|

11-13-2018, 01:05 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 11,650
|
|
Harriet would be highly unlikely, far too close to Hary's name... Personally I would like Rachel. It is unusual for a Royal, but it is a dignified bible name.
|

11-13-2018, 03:53 AM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,961
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denville
Harriet would be highly unlikely, far too close to Hary's name... Personally I would like Rachel. It is unusual for a Royal, but it is a dignified bible name.
|
But there must be a reason why Maghan does not use that name. I hate my first name, use my second in RL and would never have given a child my real first name.
|

11-13-2018, 04:37 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 9,019
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn
But there must be a reason why Maghan does not use that name. I hate my first name, use my second in RL and would never have given a child my real first name.
|
Her parents decided to use Meghan (somewhat comparable with Harry's parents deciding to use Harry instead of Henry - that wasn't Harry's decision either), so she might be fond of the name Rachel as well (she played the character Rachel in Suits  ) but stuck with the name she was always known by. So, she needed a very good reason to start using Rachel instead of Meghan - not the other way around.
|

11-13-2018, 06:00 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 310
|
|
Boy:
Philip
Alexander
John
David
Arthur
Girl:
Alice
Mary
Rachael
Frances/Francesca
Matilda
|

11-13-2018, 08:03 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,677
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody
Her parents decided to use Meghan (somewhat comparable with Harry's parents deciding to use Harry instead of Henry - that wasn't Harry's decision either), so she might be fond of the name Rachel as well (she played the character Rachel in Suits  ) but stuck with the name she was always known by. So, she needed a very good reason to start using Rachel instead of Meghan - not the other way around.
|
I think Meghan sounds better with her last name than Rachel does.
But Rachel is a pretty name.
|

11-13-2018, 09:46 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
I never thought about Alexander before, but I like it a lot!
It's a strong name, like Henry, but Alex can be used for a more relaxed approach.
|

11-13-2018, 12:21 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,913
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn
But there must be a reason why Maghan does not use that name. I hate my first name, use my second in RL and would never have given a child my real first name.
|
Same here. I would never give my daughter my first name.
|

11-13-2018, 12:29 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 3,982
|
|
My vote is still Victoria Isabella Frances for a girl. Alexander Charles Henry for a boy.
Meghan has never ever gone by Rachel. You can see in her childhood videos when she was very small she was always "Meg" so I con't see her giving her daughter a name she never has used ever, and was part of her past life in Hollywood (which people use as a negative against her).
I was pretty darn close guessing Charlotte. I just had the middle names switched. Hopefully I am close once again.
|

11-13-2018, 08:52 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Austin, United States
Posts: 13
|
|
Spencer Charles Phillip for a boy. Rose Loyce Francis for a girl.
|

11-14-2018, 04:53 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: België, Belgique, Belgium
Posts: 2,343
|
|
Where does this Loyce comes from that has popped up in a few posts in this thread?
I have never heard that name. Is it a popular USA name?
I’m suggesting something classic, elegant yet new for the Royal Family.
Elinor or Isobel for a girl (they were my suggestions for a Cambridge girl).
Maybe Julian for a boy.
|

11-14-2018, 06:11 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon, United States
Posts: 949
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdm
Where does this Loyce comes from that has popped up in a few posts in this thread?
I have never heard that name. Is it a popular USA name?
I’m suggesting something classic, elegant yet new for the Royal Family.
Elinor or Isobel for a girl (they were my suggestions for a Cambridge girl).
Maybe Julian for a boy.
|
Loyce is apparently Doria Ragland's middle name.
Per the following website, as I suspected Loyce is just another version of Louise, as they both have the same meaning.
Which now makes me think I should amend my most recent guess for this baby's name, should it be a girl from Caroline Diana Jeanette to Caroline Diana Louise - that way the baby honors both grandmothers but still sticks with fairly traditional British names.
|

11-14-2018, 08:33 AM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 139
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJC
Ok I'm going for - Harriet Elizabeth Diana - or - Harriet Diana Doria - for a girl. Another Harri would be so cute. Still working on the boys.
|
Harriette with the nickname “Hattie” would be adorable.
|

11-14-2018, 09:40 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 12,943
|
|
I don't see them using loyce anymore then Jeanette. If they are going to honor Doria pretty sure they will use Doria. If they did use Loyce as a middle name, I don't see why they would make it more British by changing it to Louise.
Henrietta is cute but bit old fashioned. If they used something like that could see them like Harry as a baby making it clear a nickname would be used. I used to be a nanny years ago to a little girl with that name but she went by Ettie.
|

11-14-2018, 10:22 AM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 11,712
|
|
And Queen Henrietta Maria Bourbon was not so popular Queen in England.
|

11-15-2018, 09:54 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,875
|
|
What about Jane Fellowes? Not only did she do a reading at the wedding, but she walked out of St. George’s with Doria, Charles, Camilla, and the Cambridges.
|

11-16-2018, 08:07 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,917
|
|
It would be nice I suppose for Princess Charlotte to have a female first-cousin playmate, so in that respect it would be nice if M&H's first baby is a girl. There are of course, plenty of other young female offspring cousins i.e., the Phillips' girls and the Tindalls' two girls.
I would imagine Mark Dyson, Charlie van Straubenzee, Jessica Mulroney and Markus Anderson might be possible godparents. Also perhaps Benita Litt (a childhood friend of Meghan's whose daughter was a bridesmaid/flower girl in the royal wedding).
|

11-16-2018, 08:28 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Suriname
Posts: 9,019
|
|
What about a son called Ralph? It's their shared forefather (only 15 generations), see for example this article.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|