The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-28-2019, 06:33 PM
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,547
Originally Posted by Ista View Post
Agreed, she herself set that expectation. The norm in the past has been for the new royal to take a few months, do a few joint engagements with the spouse, and ease into the routine. Meghan chose to bypass all that, which was her prerogative, but it was definitely not expected of her.
I think it was expected that she'd start in and work full time. Philip has retired and the queen is older and frailer.. and I think she probably wants Harry and Meghan working....

Old 02-28-2019, 06:34 PM
Ista's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: the West, United States
Posts: 3,451
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Meghan did do joint engagements with Harry, all over the UK, during her engagement. I think there were about 24 of them. Harry wanted to show his fiancée the different parts of his homeland and Meghan was keen to see them. Why is that 'promoting herself'. Meghan was eager to work. And she took part in engagements in CHOGM week as well, so KP and BP must have judged that she would be fine. And she was.
I don't think anyone was saying she wasn't, unless I missed that. She did do joint engagements, and definitely hit the ground running, but that was something she seemed to have chosen, not something that was imposed on her. In retrospect, I wonder if she and Harry already knew that they wanted to start their family right away, and she wanted to get a good start before she had to take a break for maternity leave.

Old 02-28-2019, 09:04 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,310
From everything I've read about her and see her say in the would of been surprising if she hadn't hit the ground running. She seems like she has always been very involved in work/charity etc. Staying busy.

Old 02-28-2019, 09:36 PM
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,540
Originally Posted by Somebody View Post
I am not so sure that Meghan would have appreciated a more low key life. Less criticism surely would have been appreciated but she was actively promoting herself pre-Harry, and again from the moment thrir engabement was announced, so living a low key life doesn't seem to be her priority at all. Having quiet, private moments next to a very public image is more what she seems to be aiming for.

I don't think Meghan was expected to hit the ground running. She herself was the one to create that expectation. I don't think the firm would have complained had she not done as many engagements but took her time to really get to know her role a little more out of the public eye.
Well, I have to ask. Why was Meghan 'actively promoting herself' from the moment the engagement was announced? In the engagement interview with Harry? When she and Harry undertook all those engagements before they married, in different parts of the U.K.? Keeping in mind that she was going to be a fulltime Royal after her marriage and didn't have the luxury of 'learning her role out of the public eye'? I don't know how you do actually learn a Royal role without performing engagements, considering it is such an integral part of the job.

As for 'actively promoting herself' pre Harry, Meghan was an actress, and that's what actors, singers, musicians, authors etc do.
Old 02-28-2019, 10:53 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 5,956
This thread is not about Meghan's acting career, or what she did during the engagament. This is about her future duties and responsibilities.

If you wish to discuss her engagement count, take it to the British Royal Family Engagements thread.

Further off-topic posts will be deleted.
Old 04-11-2019, 06:02 AM
JessRulz's Avatar
Blog Editor
Royal Blogger
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,709
Posts discussing Harry and Meghan's role in the royal family have been moved to the thread.

This thread is now closed. You can discuss Meghan's future roles in the 'Duke and Duchess of Sussex Future, Duties and Roles' thread.

**TRF Rules and FAQ**
Closed Thread

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Popular Tags
#uae #abudhabirullingfamily 18th birthday america american archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian birth britain britannia british british royal family cadwallader camilla camilla's family camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles charles china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness coronation crown jewels duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family tree fashion and style gemstones george vi hello! highgrove history japan japanese imperial family japan history jewellery kensington palace king edward vii king juan carlos liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists mongolia norway crown princely couple politics portugal prince harry prince of wales prince of wales in jordan royal ancestry samurai solomon j solomon spanish royal family state visit st edward sussex suthida thai royal family unfinished portrait united states united states of america wales

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises