 |
|

05-08-2019, 12:25 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 4,011
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph
Not getting too far ahead but given the announcement today I'm wagering Archie will never be an HRH. I think the couple will see to that
|
I agree. I think it is pretty clear Harry and Meghan do not want titles.
|

05-08-2019, 12:26 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NYC, United States
Posts: 766
|
|
I'm trying to let the name roll off my tongue. Archie Harrison...Archie Harrison. I'm getting used it. I'm almost wishing that they went with Archbold instead, but alas, it's H&M's choice and we have to live with it.
Definitely getting used to it though.
|

05-08-2019, 12:26 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 26,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter
|
Thank you very much! It looks even beter.
|

05-08-2019, 12:26 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Woodbury, United States
Posts: 2,629
|
|
Oh boy............... I think Archie, and I think of the comic book character (whose name is Archibald.......which name I'm not a fan of). I love the name Harrison, though...
Baby Archie is a cutie pie, though - and I'm so happy for Harry and Meghan!
|

05-08-2019, 12:26 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 9,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph
Not getting too far ahead but given the announcement today I'm wagering Archie will never be an HRH. I think the couple will see to that
|
The same thought coincidentally crossed my mind. The name choice suggests to me that H&M want their children to be private citizens and not HRHs.
Is there any family connection to Archie Harrison.? Maybe a fiormer Prince nicknamed Archie ?
EDIT: BTW, I don’t understand why they are indicating Archie win’t use the courtesy title of Earl of Dumbarton. Even if he doesn’t use the subsidiary title, he is still styled as the son of a Duke in the Peerage of the UK under the 1917 LPs. So shouldn’t he be at least Lord Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor if not Lord Dumbarton ? Why is the BBC saying he will be known only as Master Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor ?
|

05-08-2019, 12:27 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marengo
Thank you very much! It looks even beter.
|
I think it's stunning! Something they need to frame!
LaRae
|

05-08-2019, 12:28 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 42
|
|
While I'm not a fan of Archie, Archibald would be unfortunate down the line if he takes after his uncle...
|

05-08-2019, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Member - in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 17,267
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amaryllus
Archie Bunker comes to mind ... an Hilarious ignorant Racist. Hmm
|
Its pretty much a coinky dink but on May 22nd in the States, they're going to revive All in the Family and the Jeffersons for a 90 minute live event. Archie Bunker will be played by Woody Harrelson. That's really what the name Archie Harrison reminded me of.
Then again, I think the chances are much, much better of the news coming out that it was cousin George that suggested the name Archie. As was mentioned earlier, George has told people that "Archie" was his name.
The name is already growing on me.
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|

05-08-2019, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Next to my books, Germany
Posts: 537
|
|
To be honest, when I read the names Archie and Harrison, my imagination goes nuts and shows me pictures of Cary Grant (whose birthname was Archibald Leach) and Harrison Ford enjoying a drink together...
Plus I am not a fan of nicknames for names. Seems incomplete to me.
|

05-08-2019, 12:32 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,198
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23
Come sit with me. I think it's an awful name for a Royal princeling. I didn't like "Harry" either but Harry's charismatic and charming personality overcame his unfortunate name.
I hope it will be the same with...errmm Archie. 
|
I agree, I think it's an ugly name. I also have a feeling that the no title at all situation may be to make it easier for them as a family to spend an increasing amount of time in America in the years to come. It's just a hunch but I feel that Meghan's heart is much more in America than in Britain. I can easily see them buying a home there.
|

05-08-2019, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: A, United States
Posts: 1,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO
I agree. I think it is pretty clear Harry and Meghan do not want titles.
|
I am just saying its automatic barring new LPs, but I don't think he will ever be styled HRH.
|

05-08-2019, 12:33 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Somewhere in Ga,, United States
Posts: 133
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empress Merel
I never saw the point in that. It's weird to me. There's this Youtube/Insta famous couple that named their daughter Genevieve, but will call her Gigi for the rest of her life and I'm just confused as to why you'd give your kid one name, to name her an entirely different one.
But that's an irrelevant discussion. 
|
Would you prefer just ARCHIBALD????
Do you know how awkward that would be and sound for the little guy? We are not in the formal 19th century anymore.
I actually like the informality of it. Worry more about Americans who want to 'male it about them' and are already making comments about Harry and Meghan being Riverdale fans. Go to their IG page and look. Sheesh.
British people apparently do not get Riverdale except on Netflix anyway.
Harrison------"Harry's Son." Very appropriate. Overall, I like it. And it fits with his apparent red hair. Maybe Meghan wanted the name to be British-sounding with an American twist. Good for her. :):)
|

05-08-2019, 12:36 PM
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Woodbury, United States
Posts: 2,629
|
|
Apparently Archie means "truly brave" in German, so that's where that comes from.......
|

05-08-2019, 12:36 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 375
|
|
I think it’s a cute name for a little boy who won’t be a working royal.
|

05-08-2019, 12:37 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 282
|
|
Archie – which is a shortened version of the name Archibald – is of German origin, and means 'true, bold, Valuable'. The name was first introduced during the Norman conquest – with the 'bald' part of the longer version, Archibald, also being interpreted as referring to the shaven head of a monk.
Harrison Transferred use of the surname originated in the Middle Ages as a Patronymic meaning "Son of Henry" or "Son of Harry"
Archie Harrison = The True, Bold, and Valuable Son of Harry
|

05-08-2019, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Somewhere, Canada
Posts: 230
|
|
Absolutely love the name and think it a very modern choice for this couple. I too, don't believe that Archie will ever be a HRH or even use a subsidiary title. I think the RF in the coming years will be down to just William & Kate and their children and Harry and Meghan without their children.
Sad, really considering how much help the Queen has had over the years with her duties, with her first cousins being a big part of that supporting role.
|

05-08-2019, 12:40 PM
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 9,240
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24
None of them have the title. It's a way they are addressed. I suppose the baby will be Archie Harrison until the time comes for him to inherit Duke of Sussex title.
|
It is true he doesn’t have any title now, but he is entitled to use the honorific prefix of Lord as the son of Duke and great-grandson in male line of a monarch. Why is the press assuming he will be only “Master Archie” ?
|

05-08-2019, 12:42 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,309
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lori138
Absolutely love the name and think it a very modern choice for this couple. I too, don't believe that Archie will ever be a HRH or even use a subsidiary title. I think the RF in the coming years will be down to just William & Kate and their children and Harry and Meghan without their children.
Sad, really considering how much help the Queen has had over the years with her duties, with her first cousins being a big part of that supporting role.
|
I'd say that if they had been considering it...all the negative hateful things tossed at them pushed them into the 'private life' decision.
LaRae
|

05-08-2019, 12:43 PM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Posts: 53
|
|
The line of succession on the royal family's official website has him listed as Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor
https://www.royal.uk/succession
|

05-08-2019, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pescara, Italy
Posts: 1,019
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno
It is true he doesn’t have any title now, but he is entitled to use the honorific prefix of Lord as the son of Duke and great-grandson in male line of a monarch. Why is the press assuming he will be only “Master Archie” ?
|
Because even the Royal Family Twitter account omitted any reference to a style/appellation/subsidiary title, so it must be the way it is. The Royal Family social media account are very detailed and precise when it comes to this things.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|