 |
|

06-13-2007, 05:12 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 159
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by betina
I only know that you can have both names as a first name. Agnethe is a bit oldfahioned more than Agnes is but old names are quite popular at the moment in Denmark
|
Agnethe sounds better than Agnes, IMO.
Sidenote: There was a time when parents preferred to name their babies non-traditional or even "invented" names in order to make their children unique.
Now, I also have a feeling that the trend has turned its direction towards oldfashioned names.
|

06-13-2007, 07:14 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 43
|
|
I really can't find any reason why Marie shouldn't be given the princess's title, if she gets married to Prince Joachim. I will be shocked if the court or the Queen gives her the tittle of countess or anything else
|

07-08-2007, 09:28 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: somewhere in, United States
Posts: 2,238
|
|
If they were in Britain, would they go by "Prince and Princess Joachim of Denmark"? Just wondering. And I don't think it will be a state wedding, but low-key and certainly in a church.
|

07-08-2007, 11:21 PM
|
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,872
|
|
Usually in Britain the sovereign's sons are given royal dukedoms, so they'd be TRH The Duke and Duchess of Whatever. Alexandra would then be Alexandra, Duchess of Whatever.
|

07-08-2007, 11:38 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 29
|
|
I think it will be weird to have two maries.....who are also have a resemblence and they even share a close birthdate.
Would Queen Margaret have Marie sign a pre nup like she did with Mary?
|

07-11-2007, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Schweinfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,694
|
|
IMO Marie Cavallier would get HRH Princess Marie of Denmark if she marries Prince Joachim. And if they will get children, they also will be HRH.
But let's wait, if the Danish royal court ever will announce a wedding between them.
BTW: Does anyone know if Marie and Crown Princess Mary are friends?
|

07-11-2007, 03:37 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia and NYC, United States
Posts: 199
|
|
There's no reason why Marie would/should get a lesser title than Alexandra so she will be HRH Princess Marie of Denmark. She will share her husband's title. Joachim and Marie's children will be HH, not HRH. Nikolai and Felix are HH since there father is neither King nor Crown Prince.
Joachim's wedding to Alexandra was not a state wedding. State weddings are for the heir to the throne. J&A's wedding was a personal affair paid for by HM.
There is no reason that Marie wouldn't be given a tiara. If Alexandra was given one then Marie will be given one too.
__________________
I'd Scream Except I Look So Fabulous
|

08-12-2007, 02:12 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden
Posts: 250
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agapi
I really can't find any reason why Marie shouldn't be given the princess's title, if she gets married to Prince Joachim. I will be shocked if the court or the Queen gives her the tittle of countess or anything else
|
I hope she will get a title like Mrs. Marie Cavallier, countess of Schackenborg, or something like that.
We can't have princesses walking in and out through the court cashing in on benefits for the rest of their lives.
The situation with Joachim and Alexandra was different because Frederik wasn't married at the time and there were no kids (heirs) or even an eligable wife in sight. So Alexandra was needed and celebrated as a possible future queen.
These days Joachim is pretty much sidelined, he is running a large estate and I would simply find it appropriate if he, in case of a marriage, renounced his royal priviliges and became Count of Schackenborg.
Apart from that I find it sick that a man falls in love with the look-alike of his brother's wife. I can't help wondering if Marie is just playing along
I believe royal tourism is part of the tourist industry in Denmark. E.g. middle aged Asian tourists like the castle tour, where they travel in a bus to Kronborg, Fredensborg and Frederiksborg north of Copenhagen.
__________________
''A day without a laughter is a day wasted'' // Anna-Lisa
|

09-11-2007, 08:57 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 550
|
|
Marie looks more exotic to me so she reminds me a little bit of Alexandra.
Would it be considered tacky to give Marie Alex's old tiara (if indeed they marry) or would she be given a different/new one?
|

09-11-2007, 09:04 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SASSY
Marie looks more exotic to me so she reminds me a little bit of Alexandra.
Would it be considered tacky to give Marie Alex's old tiara (if indeed they marry) or would she be given a different/new one?
|
I think she'll get a new one, it would be a little weird for Marie to wear a tiara that's associated with Joachim's ex- wife. Hoping to new a new tiara if Joachim ever marry again
|

09-11-2007, 09:07 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 782
|
|
Alex owns her old tiara. So there is no chance of marie getting it. She will be Princess Marie of Denmark.
|

09-11-2007, 09:56 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 3,122
|
|
Did she really keep that tiara? Was it purchased for her by the Royal Family, or was it part of the inheritance from their ancestors?
|

09-12-2007, 01:25 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rogaland, Norway
Posts: 6,043
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empress
Did she really keep that tiara? Was it purchased for her by the Royal Family, or was it part of the inheritance from their ancestors?
|
It was given to her as a personal gift by Queen Margrethe - and she kept it in the divorce. It was given to Queen Alexandrine by her parents for her 18th birthday, and has been in the family since then. It is speculated that the tiara will pass to Nikolai's bride whenever he marries.
|

09-12-2007, 05:28 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daneborn
Apart from that I find it sick that a man falls in love with the look-alike of his brother's wife. I can't help wondering if Marie is just playing along
|
There've been cases where men married their brother's widows... As for Marie, it's her problem how to deal with this look-a-likeness.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
|

09-12-2007, 07:26 AM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
|
|
Quote:
So Alexandra was needed and celebrated as a possible future queen.
|
Do you mean in the event that Frederik died childless and without a spouse, thus resulting in Joachim inheriting the office of sovereignty?
__________________
"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
|

09-13-2007, 09:31 AM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,188
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daneborn
I hope she will get a title like Mrs. Marie Cavallier, countess of Schackenborg, or something like that.
We can't have princesses walking in and out through the court cashing in on benefits for the rest of their lives.
The situation with Joachim and Alexandra was different because Frederik wasn't married at the time and there were no kids (heirs) or even an eligable wife in sight. So Alexandra was needed and celebrated as a possible future queen.
|
Actually, when Alexandra married Joachim and got the title of a princess nobody thought that she was needed or celebrated her as a possible future queen. Frederik was not 30 then and people expected him to marry. A few years later, especially after the birth of Nikolai, some warmed up with the idea of Alexandra as a future queen. But at the time of her wedding Alexandra got the title because it was the title of her husband to be.
And so will Marie if she ever marries Joachim. It would be strange to "punish" Marie for something Alexandra did (walking in and out and cashing in on benefits).
|

09-13-2007, 12:06 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 159
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricarda
Actually, when Alexandra married Joachim and got the title of a princess nobody thought that she was needed or celebrated her as a possible future queen. Frederik was not 30 then and people expected him to marry. A few years later, especially after the birth of Nikolai, some warmed up with the idea of Alexandra as a future queen. But at the time of her wedding Alexandra got the title because it was the title of her husband.
And so will Marie if she ever marries Joachim. It would be strange to "punish" Marie for something Alexandra did (walking in and out and cashing in on benefits).
|
You are right that Marie should not be "punished" just because some people aren´t happy with what happened to Alexandra.
However, Alexandra should not be blamed for the "benefits" she got. She didn´t ask for those benefits on her own. They are granted to her from the generous Danish people. It´s not Alexandra´s fault to receive the allowance. Besides, she has to pay tax now after her remarriage, just like other normal Danes.
Daneborn´s concern makes sense to me. If some Danes start to feel unhappy to pay for an ex-princess, it´s normal that they want to prevent paying the next ex-princess. Honestly, who can be sure that Joachim and Marie will stay forever together til death separates them?
But anyway, Marie has to first marry Joachim and then there will be those questions coming.
BTW, I don´t think Marie would care if she will be called Countess or Princess after marrying to Joachim if her only reason to marry him was love. Personally I think she deserves a princess title if her current husband is a prince.
|

09-13-2007, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 135
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnik
Interesting questions, but we should waite until they will be official engage.
As a wife os a HRH Prince she probably will be a HRH Princess Joachim. But all depend of the Queen if she approve the possible future mariage.
|
She will not be "Princess Joachim". She will become HRH Princess Marie.
The custom of adding the husband's name after the title is an Anglo-German traditon that has never been in practice in other Countries (except for the UK and German Royal and Princley Houses).
|

09-13-2007, 02:50 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Distrito federal, Mexico
Posts: 239
|
|
I believe She will be HRH Princess Joachim.
|

09-13-2007, 03:00 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Haifa, Israel
Posts: 79
|
|
If Marie marries HRH Prince Joachim she will become HRH Princess Marie. I don't think she'll be punished for being the second wife of the prince. :)
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|