 |
|

11-02-2005, 11:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,377
|
|
Where's den nye lille prins? In the bag?  LOL
|

11-02-2005, 11:43 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 2,741
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
Where's den nye lille prins? In the bag?  LOL
|
Yup, the lille prins is in his carrycot. It is very maneuverable and easier to handle and lighter than a car seat carry around.
|

11-02-2005, 11:50 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 4,848
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdas1201
|
thanks so much for these photos, pdas1201... they're lovely...
|

11-02-2005, 11:51 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 6,921
|
|
Thanks pdas1201! It's great to see Mary and Frederik getting about with den nye lille prins. Hope they tell us soon when the baptism will be.
|

11-03-2005, 12:16 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdas1201
Yup, the lille prins is in his carrycot. It is very maneuverable and easier to handle and lighter than a car seat carry around.
|
Oh my! I was making a joke - it looks like an overnight bag or something for sports equipment! You mean that they carry babies in this? What about the swinging?
|

11-03-2005, 04:05 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 616
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel
Oh my! I was making a joke - it looks like an overnight bag or something for sports equipment! You mean that they carry babies in this? What about the swinging?
|
The babies don't mind, I think they even enjoy it - it's like a cradle where the rocking movement is deliberate. My baby used to fall asleep quickly when carried like this.
|

11-03-2005, 05:55 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Senonnes, France
Posts: 411
|
|
Thanks for the pics
|

11-03-2005, 09:57 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 296
|
|
Nice to see them out and about.
I wonder what duties Mette is carrying out, I think I would be a terrible employee for a nanny. Don't think I could let them do anything!
I was suprised that Mary had a nanny already, I had thought she would wait a while as she is not working so much at the moment. Although it is probably better tolet the baby get used to Mette and plus she can be on hand with advice for Mary.
BTW - Do any of you guys visit the http://crownprincessmary.ipbhost.com/index.php?act=idx
board? I have been unable to access that site for a few days now.
|

11-03-2005, 10:08 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,613
|
|
I can access the site without a problem, I can't imagine what's going on for you though.
Is your password correct? Or maybe the site just had difficulties in the last few days when I haven't logged in.
__________________
In critical moments even the powerful have need of the weakest.
Aesop
|

11-03-2005, 10:51 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 341
|
|
I always thought that Mary said that her children wouldn't be raised with nannies around, but please do correct me if I'm mistaken.
__________________
it's not that chocolates are a substitute for love. Love is a substitute for chocolate.
|

11-03-2005, 10:59 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agisele
I always thought that Mary said that her children wouldn't be raised with nannies around, but please do correct me if I'm mistaken.
|
It's an Australian thing, to us 'raised' means the part the parents would usually play in the upbringing of their children.
What the CP meant was that she didn't want her children to be raised (meaning predominately cared for) by nannies, but that they would play the part that babysitters and daycare would play in the lives of non-royal children.
__________________
In critical moments even the powerful have need of the weakest.
Aesop
|

11-03-2005, 11:11 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 782
|
|
When she said she did not want her children being raised by nannies she was refering to Fred's childhood and historical raising of royal children. In the past royal children were handed off the their nannies and rarely ever saw the parents. Mary is saying she does not want that type of cold upbrining for her kids. Mary cannot also look after her children 24/7. I have no doubt both Fred and Mary will be very very involved with their children.
|

11-03-2005, 01:52 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The, United States
Posts: 447
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agisele
I always thought that Mary said that her children wouldn't be raised with nannies around, but please do correct me if I'm mistaken.
|
Of course if she has to be away working, then she will use a nanny as other people use nannies or sitters. What Mary meant was that when she is at home, she plans to be very involved in her children's lives and raise them herself. Nannies will not be her the primary caregivers of the children as it has been in the past for many royal families.
__________________
"Always do what you are afraid to do."
- R.W. Emerson
|

11-03-2005, 10:00 PM
|
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SYDNEY, Australia
Posts: 169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmmieLou
|
Hi EmmieLou
You can try to access CPMEMB again. I have NO problem with accessing the above site.
Cheers
|

11-04-2005, 05:25 AM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: , Italy
Posts: 273
|
|
Mary loves the photographers very much!
How attention seeking Mary is? She is enjoying the photoshoot very much ! She prefers to smile into the cameras instead of holding her baby. It seems to me that Fred takes care of their baby more than Mary.
|

11-04-2005, 05:28 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Portugal, Portugal
Posts: 3,115
|
|
Must they have all nannys??? Is it possible that a member of the royal family cannot raise is child without a nanny!!!! Please!!!!
|

11-04-2005, 05:32 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido
How attention seeking Mary is? She is enjoying the photoshoot very much ! She prefers to smile into the cameras instead of holding her baby. It seems to me that Fred takes care of their baby more than Mary.
|
You must be joking?
Whats wrong with a smile or a wave?
And just because the baby's father is holding him makes Mary a bad mother...
Quite the pompous remark & totally unfounded!
"MII"
|

11-04-2005, 05:39 AM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , Hungary
Posts: 39
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido
How attention seeking Mary is? She is enjoying the photoshoot very much ! She prefers to smile into the cameras instead of holding her baby. It seems to me that Fred takes care of their baby more than Mary.
|
You are so right . I totally agree. Mary always hunts for the paparazzis cameras too singularly ,especially with her eyes. IMO, Yes ,She does enjoy the photoshoot very much. Mary looks like a Hollywood ambitious actress who looks for people attention.
|

11-04-2005, 05:40 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biboquinhas
Must they have all nannys??? Is it possible that a member of the royal family cannot raise is child without a nanny!!!! Please!!!!
|
of course its not impossible for a child to be raised by their parents and parents alone. But I hardly think that a Crown Princess can start to breast feed at an official engagement or console her child when he starts screaming during a talk or rock the baby's pram, burp the baby etc etc.
For official engagements the child shall be in the care of the nanny, the rest of the time he shall be with his father & mother. The way it should be!
"MII"
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|